Thursday, March 29, 2018

TRUTH ON THE FLAMES OF HELL


Retribution
For after all it is only just for God to repay with affliction those who afflict you … dealing out retribution to those who do not know God and to those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. These will pay the penalty of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, (1:6, 8–9)
Ekdikēsis (retribution), meaning “to give full punishment,” is variously translated “justice,” “punishment,” “retribution,” “vengeance,” and “avenging of wrong.” In his defense before the Sanhedrin, Stephen said, “And when he [Moses] saw one of them being treated unjustly, he defended him and took vengeance [ekdikēsis] for the oppressed by striking down the Egyptian” (Acts 7:24). Just as Moses brought retribution to the Egyptian for mistreating his fellow Israelites, so also will God bring retribution to those who reject Him and mistreat His people.
God’s retribution, however, is not like the unruly, hostile, selfish, sinful passion that causes people to retaliate against others, since “the God who inflicts wrath is not unrighteous” (Rom. 3:5). But because sinful humans are not perfectly holy, completely just, and omniscient, they cannot render perfect judgment. Therefore, God reserves vengeance for Himself. In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus forbade personal vengeance (Matt. 5:38–48), and Paul wrote in Romans 12:19, “Never take your own revenge, beloved, but leave room for the wrath of God, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,’ says the Lord” (cf. Deut. 32:35; Isa. 66:15–16; Heb. 10:30).
The Bible repeatedly teaches that God will deal out retribution to sinners. The imprecatory Psalms (7; 35; 40; 55; 58; 59; 69; 79; 109; 137; 139; 144) presuppose and even exalt God’s retribution. In strong, even shocking language, the psalmists cry out for God to take vengeance on their enemies:
The righteous will rejoice when he sees the vengeance;
He will wash his feet in the blood of the wicked. (Ps. 58:10)
Surely God will shatter the head of His enemies,
The hairy crown of him who goes on in his guilty deeds. (Ps. 68:21)
Add iniquity to their iniquity,
And may they not come into Your righteousness. (Ps. 69:27)
And return to our neighbors sevenfold into their bosom
The reproach with which they have reproached You, O Lord. (Ps. 79:12)
Let there be none to extend lovingkindness to him,
Nor any to be gracious to his fatherless children. (Ps. 109:12)
How blessed will be the one who seizes and dashes your little ones
Against the rock. (Ps. 137:9)
Do I not hate those who hate You, O Lord?
And do I not loathe those who rise up against You?
I hate them with the utmost hatred;
They have become my enemies. (Ps. 139:21–22)
Such forceful calls for God’s just vengeance on His enemies disturb some, as John Wenham notes:
Earlier this year [1962] 14 church study groups in Woodford looked at the Old Testament psalms and concluded that 84 of them were “not fit for Christians to sing”; and J. C. Wansey, compiler of the useful collection of New Testament passages which have been printed for congregational chanting under the title A New Testament Psalter, commented: “These psalms and parts of many others are full of tribal jealousies, bloodthirsty threats and curses, whinings and moanings, which are shocking in themselves and time-wasting to God and man. The New Testament psalms are Christian through and through.” But to jettison half the Psalter is a dubious expedient, for, as C. S. Lewis realizes, the harsh passages and the tender passages are hopelessly mixed up, and it is not possible just to ignore the unpleasant sections. (The Goodness of God [Downers Grove, Ill: InterVarsity, 1975], 149)
But imprecatory language is not restricted to the Psalms. Warned by God that the men of his hometown sought his life (Jer. 11:18, 21), Jeremiah prayed, “O Lord of hosts, who judges righteously, who tries the feelings and the heart, let me see Your vengeance on them, for to You have I committed my cause” (11:20). In response, God promised, “Behold, I am about to punish them! The young men will die by the sword, their sons and daughters will die by famine; and a remnant will not be left to them, for I will bring disaster on the men of Anathoth—the year of their punishment” (Jer. 11:22–23).
Later, in an even more forcefully worded prayer, Jeremiah cried out,
Do give heed to me, O Lord, and listen to what my opponents are saying! Should good be repaid with evil? For they have dug a pit for me. Remember how I stood before You to speak good on their behalf, so as to turn away Your wrath from them. Therefore, give their children over to famine and deliver them up to the power of the sword; and let their wives become childless and widowed. Let their men also be smitten to death, their young men struck down by the sword in battle. May an outcry be heard from their houses, when You suddenly bring raiders upon them; for they have dug a pit to capture me and hidden snares for my feet. Yet You, O Lord, know all their deadly designs against me; do not forgive their iniquity or blot out their sin from Your sight. But may they be overthrown before You; deal with them in the time of Your anger! (Jer. 18:19–23)
In Jeremiah 19:3–9 God answered the prophet’s prayer:
Thus says the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel, “Behold I am about to bring a calamity upon this place, at which the ears of everyone that hears of it will tingle. Because they have forsaken Me and have made this an alien place and have burned sacrifices in it to other gods, that neither they nor their forefathers nor the kings of Judah had ever known, and because they have filled this place with the blood of the innocent and have built the high places of Baal to burn their sons in the fire as burnt offerings to Baal, a thing which I never commanded or spoke of, nor did it ever enter My mind; therefore, behold, days are coming,” declares the Lord, “when this place will no longer be called Topheth or the valley of Ben-hinnom, but rather the valley of Slaughter. I will make void the counsel of Judah and Jerusalem in this place, and I will cause them to fall by the sword before their enemies and by the hand of those who seek their life; and I will give over their carcasses as food for the birds of the sky and the beasts of the earth. I will also make this city a desolation and an object of hissing; everyone who passes by it will be astonished and hiss because of all its disasters. I will make them eat the flesh of their sons and the flesh of their daughters, and they will eat one another’s flesh in the siege and in the distress with which their enemies and those who seek their life will distress them.”
Some, hearkening back to liberal theology’s false dichotomy between the supposedly harsh, cruel God of the Old Testament and the gentle, meek, loving Jesus of the New Testament, might be tempted to reject such strongly worded language as uncharacteristic of Jesus. But Jesus and the New Testament writers used equally strong language. Paul wrote to Timothy, “Alexander the coppersmith did me much harm; the Lord will repay him according to his deeds” (2 Tim. 4:14), while in Revelation 6:10 the Tribulation martyrs cry out, “How long, O Lord, holy and true, will You refrain from judging and avenging our blood on those who dwell on the earth?” In Matthew 3:12 John the Baptist said of Jesus, “His winnowing fork is in His hand, and He will thoroughly clear His threshing floor; and He will gather His wheat into the barn, but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.” In contrast to a popular evangelical cliché, Jesus has a horrible plan for the lives of those who reject Him.
In the parable of the wicked vinedressers (Luke 20:9–19), which pictures God’s judgment on those who reject His Son, Jesus declared,
What, then, will the owner of the vineyard do to them? He will come and destroy these vine-growers and will give the vineyard to others.” When they heard it, they said, “May it never be!” But Jesus looked at them and said, “What then is this that is written: ‘The stone which the builders rejected, this became the chief corner stone’? Everyone who falls on that stone will be broken to pieces; but on whomever it falls, it will scatter him like dust.” (Luke 20:15–18)
In Matthew 23:13–36 Jesus denounced the scribes and Pharisees and declared that they would be condemned to hell (v. 33). He promised Chorazin and Bethsaida a more fearful judgment than Tyre and Sidon (Matt. 11:20–22), whose destruction God decreed in the Old Testament (cf. Ezek. 26–28). He threatened Capernaum with a stricter judgment than even the grossly wicked city of Sodom (Matt. 11:24). Jesus declared of those who cause believers to sin, “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe to stumble, it would be better for him if, with a heavy millstone hung around his neck, he had been cast into the sea” (Mark 9:42). In Mark 14:21 Jesus pronounced His own curse on Judas Iscariot: “For the Son of Man is to go just as it is written of Him; but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been good for that man if he had not been born.”
Jesus referred to the events surrounding His second coming as the “days of vengeance” (Luke 21:22), when He will say to those who reject Him, “Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels.… These will go away into eternal punishment” (Matt. 25:41, 46). In John 5:29 He taught that there will eventually be a resurrection to judgment for all unbelievers. No passage outside of Revelation portrays so poignantly and powerfully the retribution that awaits sinners at the Second Coming as does that final New Testament book.
There is, then, no contradiction between God the Father and Jesus the Son, or between the Old and New Testaments concerning the vengeance of God; Jesus and the apostles strongly reiterated it. The subject of divine retribution leads to three questions: why will Jesus deal out retribution, to whom will He deal it out, and how will He deal it out.
why?
For after all it is only just for God to repay (1:6a)
Every culture, no matter what its laws, ethics, or morals, punishes criminals. People have a sense of justice, including capital punishment, because they are made in God’s image. What is imperfectly true in the human realm is perfectly true in God’s realm. When Paul wrote that after all it is only just, fitting, and proper for God to repay with retribution those who violate His law (as it is right for God to reward believers with the kingdom; v. 5), he was stating a self-evident truth. In fact, the word translated “retribution” in verse 8 is related to a word that means “just,” or “right.” God’s retribution is not petty vindictiveness or an emotional frenzy; God does not reach a certain level of exasperation or frustration, lose self-control, and explode in rage against wrongdoers. His retribution is the calm, controlled, just punishment meted out by the perfectly righteous Judge to those who have willfully violated His perfect law. It is not possible for God to be unjust, for “shall not the Judge of all the earth deal justly?” (Gen. 18:25).
Isaiah 45:20–25 illustrates God’s just dealing with those who reject Him:
Gather yourselves and come; draw near together, you fugitives of the nations; they have no knowledge, who carry about their wooden idol and pray to a god who cannot save. Declare and set forth your case; indeed, let them consult together. Who has announced this from of old? Who has long since declared it? Is it not I, the Lord? And there is no other God besides Me, a righteous God and a Savior; there is none except Me. Turn to Me and be saved, all the ends of the earth; for I am God, and there is no other. I have sworn by Myself, the word has gone forth from My mouth in righteousness and will not turn back, that to Me every knee will bow, every tongue will swear allegiance. They will say of Me, “Only in the Lord are righteousness and strength.” Men will come to Him, and all who were angry at Him will be put to shame. In the Lord all the offspring of Israel will be justified and will glory.
God, as it were, summons people into court and demands to know why they should not be punished for violating His law and rejecting His commandment to repent and seek His gracious forgiveness (Isa. 55:6–7). No one, of course, can offer any viable reason for having done so. Therefore, God’s judgment is just and sinners are justly condemned for rejecting Him.
Ezekiel 33:17–20 also declares God to be just when He condemns unrepentant sinners:
Yet your fellow citizens say, “The way of the Lord is not right,” when it is their own way that is not right. When the righteous turns from his righteousness and commits iniquity, then he shall die in it. But when the wicked turns from his wickedness and practices justice and righteousness, he will live by them. Yet you say, “The way of the Lord is not right.” O house of Israel, I will judge each of you according to his ways.
God cannot be unjust in dealing out retribution to sinners, for “the Almighty … will not do violence to justice and abundant righteousness” (Job 37:23); He is “great in counsel and mighty in deed, whose eyes are open to all the ways of the sons of men, giving to everyone according to his ways and according to the fruit of his deeds” (Jer. 32:19).
When the Lord Jesus Christ brings vengeance on those who reject Him, He will be acting in perfect harmony with God’s pure justice, for He is “Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and wages war” (Rev. 19:11). Those who accuse the absolutely holy God of being unjust are in fact unjust themselves. He has given His law and called people to obey it and will judge those who do not. The truth is that God would not be righteous if He did not.
Antapodidōmi (repay) means “to give back,” or “recompense.” It is a strong, compound word that conveys the idea of a full and complete repayment. The God who said, “Vengeance is Mine, and retribution” (Deut. 32:35), will justly repay sinners for violating His law.
An incident in Luke 13 illustrates that principle. Some people told Jesus “about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices” (v. 1). Apparently, Pilate had chosen to execute some Jewish rebels at a most inopportune time—while they were offering sacrifices. Naturally, that act outraged the Jews, hence their comment to Jesus. But His reply was startling. Instead of commiserating with them or expounding on why bad things happen to good people, He solemnly warned them,
Do you suppose that these Galileans were greater sinners than all other Galileans because they suffered this fate? I tell you, no, but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish. Or do you suppose that those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them were worse culprits than all the men who live in Jerusalem? I tell you, no, but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish. (vv. 2–5)
The fate of the victims was exactly that which all sinners deserve—divine judgment. All sinners deserve death and hell; therefore, Jesus twice warned His hearers that they would suffer a similar fate unless they repented. The threat of God’s vengeance, retribution, and judgment is not only just but also a deterrent, a roadblock on the way to hell. Those who ignore that roadblock are without excuse (Rom. 1:18–20).
who?
with affliction those who afflict you … to those who do not know God and to those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. (1:6c, 8b)
Those who afflict believers is a broad category, including all who attack the people of God. In Genesis 12:3 God promised Abraham, “The one who curses you I will curse,” while Zechariah 2:8 warns that “he who touches [God’s people], touches the apple of His eye.” Those who trouble God’s people in effect poke a finger in His eye. In Matthew 18:6–10 Jesus warned:
Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a heavy millstone hung around his neck, and to be drowned in the depth of the sea. Woe to the world because of its stumbling blocks! For it is inevitable that stumbling blocks come; but woe to that man through whom the stumbling block comes! If your hand or your foot causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it from you; it is better for you to enter life crippled or lame, than to have two hands or two feet and be cast into the eternal fire. If your eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out and throw it from you. It is better for you to enter life with one eye, than to have two eyes and be cast into the fiery hell. See that you do not despise one of these little ones, for I say to you that their angels in heaven continually see the face of My Father who is in heaven.
Paul further describes those who will face God’s retribution by using two phrases. First, he describes them as those who do not know God (cf. Judg. 2:10; 1 Sam. 2:12; Job 18:21; Ps. 9:17; Jer. 2:8; 9:3, 6; 10:25; Hos. 4:1, 6; 5:4; John 7:28; 8:54–55; Gal. 4:8; 1 Thess. 4:5; 1 John 4:8); that is, they do not have a personal relationship with Him (cf. John 17:3; Eph. 2:12; 4:17–18; Titus 1:16). They may know the facts about Him, and even imagine that they are serving Him by persecuting His people (cf. John 16:2), but they are in reality “separate from Christ … having no hope and without God in the world” (Eph. 2:12).
The reason they do not know God is not ignorance but wickedness that causes them to suppress the truth that they do know:
For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. (Rom. 1:18–21)
God has planted the knowledge of Himself around and within every person, so that all are without excuse (Rom. 1:20–21). He has written His law on every heart and in every conscience (Rom. 2:14–15). As a consequence of their sin-darkened hearts, unbelievers, though “professing to be wise,” in fact “became fools, and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures” (Rom. 1:22–23). Despite the abundant evidence all around them (and within them) that should lead them to a true knowledge of God, people refuse to believe. Hell will be populated by the willfully ignorant. The last words those who reject God will hear will be the Lord Jesus Christ’s chilling, terrifying pronouncement, “I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness” (Matt. 7:23).
Paul further defines those who will face God’s retribution as those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. This description intensifies their guilt. It is damning to reject an innate knowledge of God; it is to incur severer judgment to openly reject the gospel. The hottest hell, the severest punishment, is reserved for those who do not obey the gospel. In Luke 12:47–48 Jesus taught that there are varying degrees of punishment:
That slave who knew his master’s will and did not get ready or act in accord with his will, will receive many lashes, but the one who did not know it, and committed deeds worthy of a flogging, will receive but few. From everyone who has been given much, much will be required; and to whom they entrusted much, of him they will ask all the more.
The writer of Hebrews clearly states that rejecting the gospel intensifies unbelievers’ guilt:
If we go on sinning willfully after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a terrifying expectation of judgment and the fury of a fire which will consume the adversaries. Anyone who has set aside the Law of Moses dies without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. How much severer punishment do you think he will deserve who has trampled under foot the Son of God, and has regarded as unclean the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and has insulted the Spirit of grace? For we know Him who said, “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay.” And again, “The Lord will judge His people.” It is a terrifying thing to fall into the hands of the living God. (Heb. 10:26–31)
Whereas salvation is a gift to be received, the gospel is a command to be obeyed. “Therefore having overlooked the times of ignorance,” Paul declared, “God is now declaring to men that all people everywhere should repent” (Acts 17:30; cf. 26:20). For that reason, Paul wrote that his apostolic mission was “to bring about the obedience of faith among all the Gentiles for His name’s sake” (Rom. 1:5; cf. 15:18; 16:19, 26; 1 Peter 1:22). Therefore, those who remain disobedient to the command to believe the gospel will face God’s retribution.
This judgment is not rendered by God because He is angry at unbelievers for hurting His children but rather because the persecutors did not come to the Lord Jesus Christ and embrace the gospel. Specifically, this Day of the Lord judgment comes in two phases on the ungodly: First, at the close of the seven-year Tribulation (Rev. 19:11–21), and second, at the end of the millennial kingdom (Rev. 20:7–10). It will then be the fate of all the ungodly of all ages to be judged at the Great White Throne and sentenced forever to the lake of fire (Rev. 20:11–15).
how?
with affliction.… These will pay the penalty of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, (1:6b, 9)
Fittingly, God will repay the disobedient unbelievers who afflict His people with affliction. Thlipsis (affliction) can mean “trouble,” “distress,” “difficult circumstances,” or “suffering.” Paul specifically defined it in this passage as the penalty of eternal destruction. Aiōnios (eternal) refers in the overwhelming majority of its New Testament uses to things of endless duration, such as God (Rom. 16:26), the Holy Spirit (Heb. 9:14), heaven (Luke 16:9), salvation (Heb. 5:9), redemption (Heb. 9:12), the covenant (Heb. 13:20), the gospel (Rev. 14:6), God’s kingdom (2 Peter 1:11), hell (Matt. 18:8; 25:41, 46; Heb. 6:2; Jude 7), and, most frequently, eternal life (Matt. 19:16, 29; 25:46; Mark 10:17, 30; Luke 10:25; 18:18, 30; John 3:15, 16, 36; 4:14, 36; 5:24, 39; 6:27, 40, 47, 54, 68; 10:28; 12:25, 50; 17:2, 3; Acts 13:46, 48; Rom. 2:7; 5:21; 6:22, 23; Gal. 6:8; 1 Tim. 1:16; 6:12; Titus 1:2; 3:7; 1 John 1:2; 2:25; 3:15; 5:11, 13, 20; Jude 21). Like all of the above-mentioned things, the destruction of the wicked will have no end but will last forever.
Olethros (destruction) does not refer to annihilation, but to ruination. It does not mean the cessation of existence but rather the loss of all that makes existence worthwhile (cf. 1 Tim. 6:9). The lost will not cease to exist but will experience forever a life of uselessness, hopelessness, emptiness, and meaninglessness, with no value, worth, accomplishment, purpose, goal, or hope. They will be ruined forever; “They pass into a night on which no morning dawns” (Leon Morris, The Epistles of Paul to the Thessalonians, Tyndale New Testament Commentaries [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1976], 120).
Two conditions under which the lost will serve their eternal sentence reinforce the horror of their punishment. First, they will be forever away from the presence of the Lord (cf. Matt. 7:23; 25:41; Luke 13:27; Rev. 22:15). There is a great chasm fixed between the eternal realms of the blessed and the cursed (cf. Luke 16:26), separating the cursed from all that represents God’s presence. And since “every good thing given and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights” (James 1:17), there will be no vestige of goodness in hell.
The lost will also serve their eternal sentence away … from the glory of His power. Jesus described hell as a place of darkness (Matt. 8:12; 22:13; 25:30; cf. 2 Peter 2:4, 17; Jude 13), cut off from the visible display of God’s splendor and majesty. There will be no relief from hell’s horrors; nothing of God’s glorious presence to bring any shred of beauty, pleasure, joy, or peace. The lost will share hell with the devil and his angels; it will be a place of “weeping and gnashing of teeth” (Matt. 8:12; 13:42, 50; 22:13; 24:51; 25:30; Luke 13:28), where “the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever; they have no rest day and night” (Rev. 14:11). Yet no words can adequately express the misery of this reality.1

B. “It is indeed just of God to repay with affliction those who afflict you”—The Destiny of the Persecutors (1:6–10)
6 Verse 6 begins with a word that the NIV leaves untranslated (eiper, “if indeed” or even “since”), which introduces additional information about the “judgment of God” declared in v. 5. Paul returns to the theme of the just judgment of God and assures the Thessalonians that God is just: He will pay back trouble to those who trouble you. Rather than presenting a frank statement about God’s just character, the Greek text suggests that it is just in God’s sight (dikaion para theō̧) to recompense the persecutors with divine chastisement (vv. 6, 8–9) and to grant rest to the persecuted Thessalonians (vv. 7–10). God is all about just outcomes. Over and over biblical and extrabiblical literature declares that God’s judgment is in accordance with his justice (Gen. 18:25; 1 Kings 8:31–32; 2 Chr. 6:22–23; Pss. 7:8–9, 11 [7:9–10, 12]; 9:4, 8 [9:5, 9]; 35:24 [34:24]; Tob. 3:2; 2 Macc. 12:6; Sir. 35:18; 2 Tim. 4:8; Rev. 18:6–7; 19:1–2). God is not capricious but rather judges justly. Hence those who mount the opposition against the church will suffer for their opposition, while the community of God will receive its rightful recompense. God considers it a just thing to pay back trouble to those who trouble you. Scripture addresses frequently the theme of divine recompense, at times using the same verb that the apostle employs in this verse (antapodounai; see Ps. 137:8 [136:8]; Isa. 66:4, 6; Rom. 12:19; Heb. 10:30 [Deut. 32:35]). The author claims that it would be unjust for God to allow the persecutors to escape their deserved judgment.
In Romans Paul contrasts the vengeance a person may wish to extract with the retribution God brings on the enemies of his people (Rom. 12:17–19). But Paul’s purpose here is not to call the Thessalonians to abstain from revenge by giving place to divine vengeance. Rather, the emphasis on the vengeance of God is calculated to encourage the brothers and sisters in the face of great adversity, supplying them with an eschatological perspective that will enable them to evaluate their present situation rightly. As they, the Christians, presently suffer (see v. 4 and commentary), so in the future God will pay back trouble to those who trouble you. This is one of the few texts that calls the result of God’s judgment “suffering” (thlipsin, translated trouble in the NIV; see Zeph. 1:15; Rom. 2:9), although the idea is commonplace enough. The author graphically details the nature of this suffering in the following verses (vv. 8–9), and so returns to a theme that the church already understood due to the previous apostolic instruction (1 Thess. 2:14–16; 5:3, 9). The NT knows nothing of the Epicurean denial of future divine judgment nor of its rejection of providence, but affirms strongly both God’s providential care of his own and the inevitable execution of his wrath. Christians will escape the oppression of their persecutors in that day (v. 7), but those who are disobedient to the gospel will find no relief (vv. 8–9). In a world that clamors for justice, the present teaching continues to serve as a source of hope. But our modern glib rejection of the notion of divine intervention and judgment stands corrected by these words.
7 The second part of that which God considers just (v. 6) is presented in this verse. Having explained what will happen to the persecutors in the previous verse, the apostle turns his attention to the believers and assures them that they will receive liberation from their oppression when the Lord Jesus is revealed. The assurance offered the church is that he will give relief to you who are troubled, and to us as well. The promise given to these believers who have suffered so much at the hands of their persecutors (see v. 4) is that God will reward them with relief at the time of the revelation of the Lord Jesus (v. 7b). The principal verb is carried over from the previous verse (antapodounai), a term that is there linked to divine retribution or punishment but here points to the divine reward. The word that describes their promised reward could be translated “rest” (the KJV rendering of anesin), but in the NT it commonly denotes relief from some type of affliction. The apostle holds out the promise of the longed-for relief from persecution and affliction. These believers will not be disadvantaged in any way but will experience the same relief that Paul and his companions will enjoy (and to us as well). As the apostles suffered, so did the Thessalonian believers (1 Thess. 2:1, 16; 3:7; 2 Thess. 3:2). So, too, they could anticipate sharing with them in the liberation (cf. 2 Cor. 1:7). This liberation is an aspect of the full Christian hope that included resurrection and rapture (1 Thess. 4:13–18) as well as the glory or honor they will enjoy when Christ returns (2 Thess. 2:14; 1:10). The expectation of this eschatological relief in no way implies that Christians may not rightly pray and hope for the intervention of God in the present to ameliorate their situation (3:2; Phil. 1:19–26; 2 Tim. 4:16–18). What is more, in the present believers know that their lot includes affliction and that they can rest in the firm promise that God will empower them to overcome even in the midst of the adversity they face, whatever its source (Rom. 8:31–39). In the end, God’s guarantee is that the injustices they presently endure will reach their conclusion. Hope sends its roots deep into this soil.
In the second part of the verse, the apostle elaborates on the time when the events described in vv. 6 and 7a will come to pass: This will happen when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven in blazing fire with his powerful angels. In the other texts in these letters that speak of the coming of the Lord Jesus, the author refers to the event as the parousia (1 Thess. 2:19; 3:13; 4:15; 5:23; 2 Thess. 2:1), but here it is described as his “revelation” (apokalypsei; see 1 Cor. 1:7; 1 Pet. 1:7, 13; 4:13; and the verb in Luke 17:30). The term means “the removal of the veil” and is frequently employed in those contexts where the biblical author wishes to talk of some kind of divine “revelation,” such as the unveiling of truths previously hidden (Luke 2:32; 1 Cor. 14:6, 26; 2 Cor. 12:1, 7; Gal. 1:12; Eph. 1:17; 3:3). But the present declaration is not about the unveiling of some aspect of the mystery of God but of a person, the Lord Jesus. This affirmation was of great importance for these Christians who had neither a temple nor a visible god as did their pagan contemporaries. He whom neither they nor their pagan persecutors could see will be revealed in all his glory and power, and on that day all will see him (Matt. 24:30; cf. 1 Pet. 1:8). The Lord Jesus is hidden, but not absent. The hope they held was that he would be revealed from heaven, the place to which he had gone in his ascension and from which he would come upon his return (1 Thess. 1:10; 4:16 and commentary). Marshall rightly adds that the declaration that he will be revealed from heaven “does not merely indicate his origin but also stresses his authority. He comes from the dwelling place of God with the authority of God to execute judgment and recompense.”
This revelation will be in blazing fire (words that relate to the following verse but are part of this sentence in the Greek text), a further point that highlights the consequences of the unveiling for the Thessalonians’ persecutors. These words, which literally mean “in flame of fire,” constitute an intertextual allusion either to the revelation of the presence of God (Exod. 3:2–3) or to his judicial power (Isa. 66:15–16). The repeated references in this passage to Isaiah 66 and the description of judgment in v. 8 direct the reader’s attention to the fire of judgment. In this theophany the Lord Jesus “will punish those who do not know God” (v. 8).
In his revelation, the Lord Jesus will be accompanied with his powerful angels, or “the angels of his power” (angelōn dynameōs autou). A number of texts describe how these beings will accompany the Lord in his coming (1 Thess. 3:13; Matt. 16:27; 24:30–31; 25:31; Mark 8:38; and Zech. 14:5). Although they are powerful in themselves (2 Pet. 2:11), the point of the present verse is that they are the executors of the Lord’s judicial power. Paul is not thinking about some special class of angels such as those that occasionally appear in the intertestamental literature (e.g., 1 Enoch 61:10; T. Judah 3:10). The Lord Jesus, who was so despised in Thessalonica, will come with great authority and judicial power, accompanied by the those who will aid in the execution of divine judgment.
8 In v. 8 Paul explains the purpose of the Lord Jesus’ powerful judicial revelation: He will punish those who do not know God and do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. The language of the verse is taken from Isaiah 66:15 in the Greek version (“he will return vengeance in wrath”) in combination with Isaiah 66:4 (“Because I called them and they did not obey me”), which describe the wrath Yahweh visits on the disobedient. The expression translated he will punish (didontos ekdikēsin) may refer either to divine punishment (2 Cor. 7:11; 1 Pet. 2:14) or, as here in 1:8, to divine vengeance or retribution (Luke 18:3, 5; 21:22; Acts 7:24; Rom. 12:19; Heb. 10:30 [Deut. 32:35]; and 1 Enoch 25.4). This “vengeance” is the result of a judicial decision and disposition against those who have rejected God and his gospel. The nature of God’s vengeance is described more fully in the following verse. Those who have rejected God and his message will not escape judgment—God is the Avenger (1 Thess. 4:6 and commentary). This vengeance is not simple retaliation nor an irrational outburst of anger but an execution of God’s just judgment (vv. 5–6).
The ancients understood that the coherence of society was in part due to the promise of rewards and the threats of punishment. In these societies, where reciprocity was at the heart of both private and public social intercourse, the notion of retribution and reward was deeply embedded in their ideas of justice. The frustration of the Thessalonian believers would have been to suffer such injustices without any hope of recourse or vindication. But the promise held before them is that those who are presently under no threat of human justice will not escape the just vengeance of God, because the root cause of the believers’ suffering is the unbelievers’ rejection of God himself. The issues at stake go well beyond the personal.
Those who are the objects of divine vengeance are described as those who do not know God and do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. Marshall and others have suggested that two groups are in mind: the Gentiles (those who do not know God) and the Jews (those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus). Although Marshall is correct in pointing out that sometimes the Gentiles are described as those who are ignorant of God (see 1 Thess. 4:5; and Ps. 79:6 [78:6]; Jer. 10:25) and the Jews as those who are disobedient (Isa. 66:4; Acts 7:39; Rom. 10:16), Paul also accuses both groups of being disobedient (Rom. 11:30–32). Also, both the OT and the NT occasionally describe the Jews as those who are ignorant of the true God (Jer. 4:22; 9:3, 6; Hos. 5:4; John 8:55). A preferable reading of the second part of v. 8 would be to understand the statement as a two-part description of those who are subjects of divine vengeance. They are, in the first place, those who do not know God. In the OT, God declares his judgment on those who do not know him (Jer. 10:25; Ps. 79:6 [78:6]). This ignorance is not merely failing to recognize his existence but rather the rejection of his person as he is revealed to both nations and individuals (see 1 Thess. 4:5 and commentary; Rom. 1:18–32). As the knowledge of God is linked with obedience to his law (Ps. 36:10 [35:11]), so also the ignorance of God is understood as disobedience to his call. What follows is therefore closely parallel to the preceding thought. Those who suffer divine vengeance are, secondly, those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus (cf. Rom. 2:8; 1 Pet. 4:17). The NT frequently describes the act of conversion as obedience to the gospel (Acts 6:7; Rom. 1:5; 6:17; 10:16; 15:18; 16:26; Heb. 5:9; 1 Pet. 1:2, 14, 22). Such a description of the event cues us to the fact that the gospel is both the promise and offer of salvation and the demand of obedience to its call. It calls humans to respond to the good news of God, but if the divine initiative is rejected, the very same gospel becomes the criteria by which God will judge the person (Rom. 2:16). In fact, in the judicial sphere the word obey (hypakouousin) means “strict obedience to an order or a law.” God calls humans through his gospel (2:14), and those who do not respond can only hope for judgment. In the divine scheme, disobedience to the gospel is elevated to the status of a criminal offense, a thought quite different from the modern notion that the gospel should be received simply for personal benefit. Those in Thessalonica who had rejected the gospel were like those of Isaiah 66:4 (LXX), “Because I called them and they did not obey me, I spoke and they did not hear.”
9 Paul continues with a description of the character of the Lord’s vengeance against those who have rejected God and the gospel of the Lord Jesus: They will be punished with everlasting destruction and shut out from the presence of the Lord and from the majesty of his power. The words translated they will be punished (NRSV, “These will suffer the punishment,” hoitines dikēn tisousin) come from the world of jurisprudence and mean “to pay the consequences” for some action. This is the “punishment” that the guilty suffer for the evil they have done. Jude speaks of “those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire” (Jude 7); in the present passage the apostle understands the execution of the final judgment in a similar way (v. 7b). He further describes this as everlasting destruction. The term destruction (olethron, the same word encountered in 1 Thess. 5:3) frequently appears in those texts that speak of eschatological ruin or destruction (1 Tim. 6:9; Jer. 25:31 [32:31]; 48:3 [31:3]; Hag. 2:22; Wis. 1:14–15; 4 Macc. 10:15 [in combination with “eternal”]; and see Jer. 22:7; Ezek. 6:14). The duration of this destruction is everlasting or “eternal,” a terrible reality that is highlighted in other NT texts (cf. Matt. 18:8; 25:41 [“eternal fire”], 46 [“eternal punishment”]; Jude 7 [“the punishment of eternal fire”]). The apostle by no means implies that those who have rejected God will be annihilated eternally, a notion that appears to take the edge off the severity of divine judgment. Rather, the punishment will endure and will not end. While the gospel brings the promise of “eternal encouragement” (2:16) to those who receive it, rejection of God’s initiative will bring eternal perdition. This state to which the judged are assigned is variously described in the NT as a place of “unquenchable fire” (Matt. 3:12), a “fiery furnace” (Matt. 13:42, 50), the “blackest darkness” that “has been reserved forever” (Jude 13), and a “fiery lake of burning sulfur” (Rev. 21:8). The graphic language appears inadequate at each point to describe the horrid nature of this state. No hope is held out for a second opportunity to escape or obtain salvation. The verdict, as its execution, will be final.
This punishment with everlasting destruction, beyond being permanent and irrevocable, also means being shut out from the presence of the Lord and from the majesty of his power. While the preposition that begins this clause in the Greek text (apo) is construed in the NIV as signaling that the judged will be excluded from the presence of the Lord, the thought is rather that the presence of the Lord is the source from which the judgment proceeds. This part of the verse is a nearly exact citation of Isaiah 2:10, 19, and 21 from the Septuagint (“And now go into the rocks, hide in the ground, from the presence of the terror of the Lord and from the glory of his strength”). The Lord in the Isaiah texts is Yahweh, who executes his judgment in the “day of Yahweh” against those who worship idols instead of the Lord himself: “Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made. So man will be brought low and mankind humbled—do not forgive them” (Isa. 2:8–9). The pride and arrogance of those who have rejected Yahweh is the cause of this horrible judgment (2:11–12, 17). They did not exalt Yahweh, but “the Lord alone will be exalted in that day, and the idols will totally disappear” (2:17b–18). In no way will anyone escape that judgment (Isa. 2:10, 19–21). The apostle presents the terrible promise that those who disobey the call of the gospel, the persecutors of the Thessalonian Christians, will by no means escape. Their hubris and pride, linked to their adherence to false worship, will in the end cause their demise.
As in 1:9, the presence of the Lord is associated in a number of texts in the OT and the book of Revelation with the judgment of God (Num. 16:46; Judg. 5:5; Pss. 34:16 [33:17]; 96:13 [95:13]; Jer. 4:26; Ezek. 38:20; Rev. 6:16; 20:11), and, as Isaiah notes, his presence is fearful. John was given a glimpse of the final judgment and exclaimed, “Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. Earth and sky fled from his presence, and there was no place for them” (Rev. 20:11). The idea that 1:9 conveys is not merely that the disobedient will be excluded from the Lord’s presence but that from this presence the everlasting destruction comes forth. Moreover, the destruction they suffer will be from the majesty of his power. This majesty is the visible “glory” (doxēs) of God and is synonymous with his presence (Rom. 1:23; Jude 24). Christ is himself called the “Lord of glory” (1 Cor. 2:8), while on the other hand “glory” at times describes God’s power (Rom. 6:4; Col. 1:11). The present verse highlights precisely this idea (ischyos, power, speaks of the power of God in Eph. 1:19; 6:10). The Lord Jesus comes in the divine power and is able to execute judgment. The majesty of his power is both the measure and the source of this judgment.2


Joys and Sorrows in God’s Final Judgment
5 which is manifest evidence of the righteous judgment of God, that you may be counted worthy of the kingdom of God, for which you also suffer; 6 since it is a righteous thing with God to repay with tribulation those who trouble you, 7 and to give you who are troubled rest with us when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, 8 in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God, and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.
9
These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, 10 when He comes, in that Day, to be glorified in His saints and to be admired among all those who believe, because our testimony among you was believed.
2 Thessalonians 1:5–10
This section begins in the middle of a long sentence, but moves into a separate theme: the divine punishment of the unjust and the rewarding of the faithful. Paul sees their faith, love, and endurance as “manifest evidence” of God’s righteous judgment. It is not the persecutions and tribulations that are the proofs of God’s righteousness. In the deepest sense, they could be regarded as contradictions of a righteous universe. But the fact that such things can be overcome by faith, love, and endurance is the manifest evidence to which Paul appeals. There is an underlying theme that our sufferings are part of the process by which God counts us worthy of His kingdom. Just as righteousness is imparted to us by God through faith in Jesus, so worthiness of the kingdom is declared to us by God through our sufferings for His kingdom. We must make clear the distinction between suffering in order to gain the kingdom and God’s declaration of our worthiness through the suffering. Nowhere is the former even implied by Paul. We cannot leave this statement without recognizing that the “manifest evidence” of God’s righteous judgment through their faith, love, and endurance is not intended to be a “proof” in the sense of a mathematical exercise.
What follows, beginning with verse 6, is a passage of great difficulty for those who wish to avoid the haunting questions of eternal punishment and hell. I have before me one respected commentary which makes no comment on verses 6 through 9. I might wish to place these verses in the category of “things I wish Paul hadn’t written.” I also have a list of things I wish Jesus hadn’t said. We begin a section like this by pointing out that the Scriptures were not written to tell us what we want to hear. They are given to us to reveal the truth. And in this case, the truth may not be to our liking.
There are three basic issues presented in verses 6–9: (1) divine retribution, (2) eternal punishment, and (3) the glorification of Christ.
Divine retribution. Two rewards are set forth—to the troubler of the faithful, tribulation; to the believers who are being troubled, rest. The rewards are not meted out during this life, but when the Lord Jesus is “revealed.” Here, the word is not parousia but apokalupsis, another word used to denote the Second Coming. Apokalupsis is rightly translated “revelation or revealing” and portrays the return of Christ as the “revealing.” The title, of course, of the last book of the New Testament is Apokalupsis Iōannou, A Revelation of John.
We err if we think of divine retribution as an activity of God in the present age. Many evil people prosper. Many good people suffer. Christians in many times and places experience nothing but persecution and suffering, while their oppressors, the rich and powerful, live sumptuously. Take an example from Uganda. Idi Amin engaged in widespread persecution and slaughter of countless thousands of believers. To be sure, he fell from power, but still lived lavishly in Syria. The Christians of Uganda continued to suffer incredible deprivations because of his madness. There is no sense in which divine retribution could be regarded as having fully happened.
The teaching here points beyond the return of Christ to the full establishment of the kingdom of God. The righteous, those in Christ, shall be rewarded with rest and glory. The evil, “those who do not know God,” and “those who do not obey the gospel,” shall receive “tribulation” and “vengeance.”
To be sure, many of us do not like to think in terms of divine retribution. The thought of God returning evil for evil in a realm beyond this life is not our idea of good news. But we have to look at the alternative. What kind of a world is it if our actions have no lasting consequences? If you grant that life does not end with death—that life is eternal—can you make sense out of a universe in which everyone receives the same reward, irrespective of their lives here? Can God be just and reward Idi Amin and St. Francis just the same? Are there no lasting consequences to our actions over a lifetime? Do Adolf Hitler and Billy Graham receive the same welcome?
The God of the Bible, present with us in Jesus Himself, is the God who takes us seriously. Our lives do matter, and our behavior does have lasting consequences. And Paul did not dream this up out of some sadistic urges. It was Jesus Himself who taught this quite early. Nowhere was He more specific than in His portrayal of the final judgment in Matthew 25:31–46. Those who had fed the hungry, clothed the naked, sheltered the strangers, visited the sick and the prisoners were rewarded. Those who had ignored and neglected such acts of kindness were sent away.
Divine retribution is another way of saying that this life is significant. Our actions have lasting consequences. What we do in this life might be likened to the introductory measures of an endless symphony.
Eternal punishment. The second element of bad news in this section is eternal punishment. “Those who do not know God,” and “those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christshall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord.” Let us quickly come to Paul’s rescue and recall that he was only transmitting what Jesus had clearly taught. The last word of the scene portrayed in Matthew 25 was “and these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life”(Matt. 25:46). In the parable of the rich man and Lazarus the picture is reinforced (Luke 16:19–31).
The philosophical argument for eliminating hell and eternal punishment has great emotional appeal. It is based upon the thought that God’s love cannot be defeated, and that somehow His love will find a way to redeem every last sinner from hell. To hold this view, one not only has to accept the fact that it is contrary to what we are taught by Jesus Himself, but one has to ignore the pervasive power of human sin and rebellion. It is my conviction that hell is a matter of choice. One can only get there by pushing God’s love aside. Paul’s phrase in verse 8 “those who do not know God” does not imply passive ignorance. It refers to those who have neglected and refused the knowledge of God that has been given to them, even though they may not have knowledge of the gospel of Jesus Christ. This was developed in greater detail in his later letter to Rome (Rom. 1:18–32).
Eternal punishment is never indicated in the Scriptures as meted out because of mere ignorance. It is a result of disobedience. And again we are back to the reality that our behavior does have lasting consequences.
The language describing heaven and hell, of necessity, is always figurative and pictorial. We cannot know what they are like in terms of our earthly categories. They transcend all of our experience and knowledge. But perhaps Paul gives us the closest thing possible to a description of hell in the words of verse 9, “punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power” (emphasis mine). Separation from the Lord’s presence and glory is the ultimate punishment. And one chooses in this life to be present with God or to be separated. C. S. Lewis, I think, suggested that one who had chosen to be separated from Christ in this life is simply given the freedom to continue in that choice. In that sense, heaven or hell begins in this life. In death our choices are sealed.
The glorification of Christ. And now we move to the good news. What joy is portrayed on that Day of the Lord “because our testimony among you was believed” (v. 10). It’s as though Paul is anticipating that happy reunion when he shall be forever reunited with those Christians in Thessalonica to whom he cannot now return. And all of the glory on that day will focus on Jesus! He will be: (1) “glorified in His saints,” and (2) “admired among all those who believe.”
Here are two fascinating ideas. The thought of the glory of Jesus being seen in His saints suggests that we shall be reflectors of His brightness. What a future for each of us! To be with Him and each other on that day when His very glory will be seen shining in us!
The admiration of Jesus among all those who believe probably reflects a meaning of “admiration” no longer connoted in English usage. The root of the Greek word gives a sense of “marveling” or “wondering at.” Thus, the New English Bible translates “to be adored among all believers.” Phillips uses “It will be a breath-taking wonder to all who believe.” Another dramatic picture of our future! To be a part of an awe-inspired assembly caught up in wonder, love, and praise!
Paul has faithfully delivered the bad news and the good news. The stark awfulness of the bad news makes the good news even better. God’s offer of the good news is to every single human being. No one need live by the bad news. And that’s the Good News3


2 Thessalonians 1:9 (NKJV)
These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power,
Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power [2 Thess. 1:8–9].
The Word of God actually says very little about heaven. One of the reasons is that it is so wonderful we could not comprehend it. And the Lord does not want us to get so heavenly minded that we are no earthly good. He wants us to keep our eyes on our pathway down here, and I think He wants us to keep our noses to the grindstone much of the time. In other words, He has a purpose for our lives on earth, and He wants us to fulfill that purpose.
Scripture not only says very little about heaven, it says less about the condition of the lost. It is so awful that the Holy Spirit has drawn a veil over it. There is nothing given to satisfy the morbid curiosity or the lust for revenge. When God judges, He does not do it in a vindictive manner. He does it in order to vindicate His righteousness and His holiness. There is nothing in the Scriptures to satisfy our curiosity about hell, but there is enough said to give us a warning. It does not mean that it is less real because so little is said. Actually, Christ Himself said more about hell than did anyone else. Hell is an awful reality. I am not going to speculate about it; I’m just quoting what is said right here: He is coming “in flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power.”
Hell is ridiculed today, but that does not mean it doesn’t exist. Our beliefs are sometimes only wishful thinking. For example, it was the popular notion that Hitler would not plunge Europe into a war and turn Europe into a holocaust of flaming fire. But he did. Chamberlain, the man with the umbrella, went over to meet with Hitler and Mussolini, and he came back saying that we would have peace in our time. Well, we didn’t have peace, and we don’t have peace in the world today. Also, many people thought that Japan would never attack America. Our government did not believe she would, and the liberal churches at that time were teaching pacifism. Well, whether they believed it or not, there was a vicious attack at Pearl Harbor.
Friend, we might as well face the fact that there is a hell. Christ is returning to this earth some day. First He will take His own out of the earth, and then His coming will be a terror to the wicked; it will be a judgment upon those who “know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.” “And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent” (John 17:3). Do you want to work for your salvation? Jesus said, “… This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent” (John 6:29). That is what the Word of God teaches.
I know that it is not popular to talk about hell and judgment. Even the Christian testimonies that we hear and read are filled with I, I, I—“I became successful in business. I saved my marriage. My personality changed.” Nothing very much is said about the Lord Jesus. How many testimonies have you heard in which it is said, “I was a hell–doomed sinner going straight to hell, I was lost, and He saved me”? The important thing to say in a testimony is not what He has given you but from what He has delivered you. That was the whole purpose for the coming of our Savior. He came to redeem us! He didn’t come to give us new personalities or to make us successful. He came to deliver us from hell! That’s not popular to say. Folk don’t like to hear it.
There are too few people today who are willing to confront folk with the fact that they are lost. Suppose you were asleep in a burning building, and a man rushed into that building to rescue you. He awakened you, picked you up, and carried you bodily out of that burning building. He liked you; so he made you his son. He brought you into his lovely home and gave you many wonderful gifts. Now if you had the opportunity to stand before a group of people and tell about this man and express your appreciation in his presence, what would you thank him for? Would you thank him for making you his son? I hope you would. But wouldn’t you really thank him most for the fact that he risked his life to save you out of a burning building? Nothing else would have mattered if he had not rescued you from a flaming death.
Now, my friend, the judgment of the lost is coming. If you want to stay in that class, you shall be judged. Somebody needs to tell you the facts, and I am telling them to you right now.
Again, who are the lost? They are those who (1) “know not God” and who (2) “obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.” Let me repeat verse 9: “Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power.”4

Recompense (vv. 6, 7b–9). God will recompense affliction to the lost, but rest to the saved. To recompense means “to repay.” Certainly, the wicked who persecute the godly do not always receive their just payment in this life. In fact, the apparent prosperity of the wicked and difficulty of the godly have posed a problem for many of God’s people (see Ps. 73; Jer. 12:1; Hab. 1). Why live a godly life if your only experience is that of suffering?
As Christians, we must live for eternity and not just for the present. In fact, living “with eternity’s values in view” is what makes our Christian life meaningful today. We walk by faith, and not by sight.
This brings to mind the story of the two farmers, one a believer and the other an atheist. When harvest season came, the atheist taunted his believing neighbor because apparently God had not blessed him too much. The atheist’s family had not been sick, his fields were rich with harvest, and he was sure to make a lot of money.
I thought you said it paid to believe in God and be a Christian,” said the atheist.
It does pay,” replied the Christian. “But God doesn’t always pay His people in September.”
What kind of a future does the unbeliever face? Look at the dramatic words Paul used to describe it: tribulation, vengeance, flaming fire, punishment, and everlasting destruction. The Christ-rejecting world will receive from God exactly what it gave to God’s people! When God recompenses, He pays in kind; for there is a law of compensation that operates in human history.
Pharaoh tried to drown all the male babies born to the Jews, and his own army was drowned in the Red Sea. Haman plotted to wipe out the Jews, and he and his own sons were wiped out. The advisers of King Darius forced him to arrest Daniel and throw him into a lions’ den, but later they themselves were thrown to the lions. The unbelieving Jewish leaders who sacrificed Christ in order to save the nation (see John 11:49–53) in a few years saw their city destroyed and their nation scattered.
It is a righteous thing for God to judge sin and condemn sinners. A holy God cannot leave sin unjudged. People who say, “I cannot believe that a loving God would judge sinners and send people to hell” understand neither the holiness of God nor the awfulness of sin. While it is true that “God is love” (1 John 4:8), it is also true that “God is light” (1 John 1:5), and in His holiness He must deal with sin.
A Christian doctor had tried to witness to a very moral woman who belonged to a church that denied the need for salvation and the reality of future judgment. “God loves me too much to condemn me,” the patient would reply. “I cannot believe that God would make such a place as a lake of fire.”
The woman became ill and the diagnosis was cancer. An operation was necessary. “I wonder if I really should operate,” the doctor said to her in her hospital room. “I really love you too much to cut into you and give you pain.”
Doctor,” said the patient, “if you really loved me, you would do everything possible to save me. How can you permit this awful thing to remain in my body?”
It was easy then for him to explain that what cancer is to the body, sin is to the world; and both must be dealt with radically and completely. Just as a physician cannot love health without hating disease and dealing with it, so God cannot love righteousness without hating sin and judging it.
The word vengeance must not be confused with revenge. The purpose of vengeance is to satisfy God’s holy law; the purpose of revenge is to pacify a personal grudge. God does not hold a grudge against lost sinners. Quite the contrary, He sent His Son to die for them, and He pleads with them to return to Him. But if sinners prefer to “know not God, and … obey not the Gospel” (2 Thes. 1:8), there is nothing left for God to do but judge them.
This judgment will take place when Jesus Christ returns to the earth with His church and His angels (2 Thes. 1:7). This is not the same event described by Paul in 1 Thessalonians 4:13–18. We may contrast these two events:
1 Thessalonians 4:13–18
2 Thessalonians 1


Christ returns in the air

Christ returns to the earth



He comes secretly for the church

He comes openly with the church



Believers escape the Tribulation

Unbelievers experience Tribulation, judgment



Occurs at an undisclosed time

Occurs at the end of the Tribulation period, the Day of our Lord5




1 MacArthur, J. F., Jr. (2002). 1 & 2 Thessalonians (pp. 236–245). Chicago: Moody Press.
2 Green, G. L. (2002). The letters to the Thessalonians (pp. 286–293). Grand Rapids, MI; Leicester, England: W.B. Eerdmans Pub.; Apollos.
3 Demarest, G. W., & Ogilvie, L. J. (1984). 1, 2 Thessalonians / 1, 2 Timothy / Titus (Vol. 32, pp. 111–115). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Inc.
4 McGee, J. V. (1991). Thru the Bible commentary: The Epistles (1 and 2 Thessalonians) (electronic ed., Vol. 49, pp. 110–112). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
5 Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 2, pp. 194–195). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.

END VTIMES


VICIOUS AND VOCAL VOLITION OF THE MAN OF SIN
And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done [Dan. 11:36].
At this point history ends and prophecy begins. The text passes from a vile person to a vicious character, moving over a bridge of unmeasured time. Antiochus Epiphanes was certainly a contemptible person, but he could not measure up to the king described in verses 36–39. Antiochus was an adumbration of Antichrist, and I believe that this passage of Scripture thus indicates that Antichrist will rise out of the geographical bounds of the ancient Grecian Empire.
There will be a political Antichrist, the one who is mentioned here, a Gentile raised out of the Roman Empire. There will also be a religious Antichrist who will pretend to be Christ and who will arise out of the land of Israel—he will be like a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Antichrist is given many names in Scripture. J. Dwight Pentecost, in his book Things to Come (p. 334), gives a list of names compiled by Arthur W. Pink (The Antichrist, pp. 59–75) which are applicable to Antichrist: “The Bloody and Deceitful Man (Ps. 5:6), the Wicked One (Ps. 10:2–4), the Man of the Earth (Ps. 10:18), the Mighty Man (Ps. 52:1), the Enemy (Ps. 55:3), the Adversary (Ps. 74:8–10), the Head of Many Countries (Ps. 111:6 [sic]), the Violent Man (Psalm 140:1), the Assyrian (Isa. 10:5–12), the King of Babylon (Isa. 14:2), the Sun [sic] of the Morning (Isa. 14:12), the Spoiler (Isa. 16:4–5; Jer. 6:26), the Nail (Isa. 22:25), the Branch of the Terrible Ones (Isa. 25:5), the Profane Wicked Prince of Israel (Ezek. 21:25–27), the Little Horn (Dan. 7:8), the Prince that shall come (Dan. 9:26), the Vile Person (Dan. 11:21), the Willful King (Dan. 11:36), the Idol Shepherd (Zech. 11:16–17), the Man of Sin (2 Thess. 2:3), the Son of Perdition (2 Thess. 2:3), the Lawless one (2 Thess. 2:8), the Antichrist (1 John 2:22), the Angels [sic] of the Bottomless Pit (Rev. 9:11), the Beast (Rev. 11:7; 13:1). To these could be added: the One Coming in His Own Name (John 5:43), the King of Fierce Countenance (Dan. 8:23), the Abomination of Desolation (Matt. 24:15), the Desolator (Dan. 9:27).”
The king shall do according to his will.” Antichrist is self–willed. How contrary this is to the Lord Jesus Christ who said, “I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me” (John 5:30).
He shall exalt himself.” The little horn (the name given to Antichrist in ch. 7) tries to be a big horn. Again, how unlike the Lord Jesus this is! Paul wrote of Him: “Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross” (Phil 2:5–8).
And magnify himself above every god.” In 2 Thessalonians 2:4 Paul wrote of the Antichrist: “Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.” And in Revelation 13:8 we are also told: “And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.”
It is blasphemous rebellion against God which marks the willful king as the final and logical expression of humanism. He is the typical representative of that which is against God and that which is our old nature: “Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God” (Rom. 8:7–8). The carnal mind of men will turn to the Antichrist. When men choose their own rulers and leaders, what kind of man do they choose? Generally it is one who is like they are, and that is the reason we are getting such sorry leaders in the world today. The leadership of the world is frightful—they are the kind of folk we picked out. God has said right here in the Book of Daniel that He would set over the kingdoms of this world the basest of rulers.
And shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished.” The willful king will be successful at first and for a brief time. God will permit this to come to pass during the last half of Daniel’s Seventieth Week.1

Chapter Eleven
Daniel 11:1–35
A Remarkable Prophecy—Part 1
Fulfilled prophecy is one of the proofs of the inspiration of the Bible, for only an omniscient God can know future events accurately and direct His servants to write them down. “He reveals deep and secret things; He knows what is in the darkness, and light dwells with Him” (Dan. 2:22, nkjv). It is no surprise, then, that the radical critics have attacked the Book of Daniel, and especially these chapters, because they claim that nobody could write in advance so many accurate details about so many people and events. Their “scientific conclusion” is that the Book of Daniel is a fraud; it was written centuries after these events, and therefore is not a book of prophecy at all. These critics can’t deny the historicity of the events, because the records are in the annals of ancient history for all to read and cannot be denied. Therefore, to maintain their “scientific theories,” they must deny the reality of prophecy. Those of us who believe in a great God have no problem accepting “the word of prophecy” (2 Peter 1:19–21).
First, we will consider the verses that were prophecy in Daniel’s day but have been fulfilled and are now ancient history. As we do, we will try to glean some practical spiritual lessons to help us in our Christian walk today.
1. Prophecies about Persia (Dan. 11:1–2)
It’s likely that verse 1 should be at the end of the previous chapter since it deals with the holy angels’ conflict with Satan’s angels. The rulers of Persia had no idea that Satan was seeking to control their minds and lead them into making decisions that would hurt the people of God. The Persian rulers were much more considerate of the Jews than were the Babylonian rulers, and Satan didn’t want this to happen. He hates the Jews and is the father of anti-Semitism wherever it is found (Rev. 12). However, Michael and Gabriel won that battle and Darius and Cyrus showed compassion for the Jewish exiles. In fact, it was Cyrus who issued the important edict that permitted the Jews to return to their land and rebuild their temple (Ezra 1:1–4).
The four kings that would rule in the future were Cambyses (529–522), Pseudo-Smerdis (522–521), Darius I Hystapes (521–486), and Xerxes (496–465), the Ahasuerus of the Book of Esther.
Cambyses was the son and successor of Cyrus the Great, and perhaps is the Ahasuerus of Ezra 4:6. His passionate ambition was to invade Egypt and regain the territory that Nebuchadnezzar had gained but that was later lost. Cambyses manufactured an excuse for the war, saying that he had asked for the hand in marriage of one of the Egyptian princesses but had been rejected by her father. He did conquer Egypt, but when he tried to take Ethiopia and Carthage, he failed miserably and had to retreat. He ruled Egypt with an iron hand and gave every evidence of being insane. He married two of his sisters, murdered his brother and heir Smerdis, and then murdered the sister who protested the murder of the brother. One of the leading Persian priests plotted an insurrection and seized the throne, taking the name of the dead prince. (Historians call him Pseudo-Smerdis.) Cambyses died while marching home to unseat the new king, who reigned for about a year.
But the most important of the four kings, and the wealthiest, was Xerxes I, the Ahasuerus of the Book of Esther. He ruled an empire that reached from Ethiopia to India and he had a great passion to conquer Greece. In 480 he tried to invade Greece, but his vast fleet was defeated at Salamis and Samos, and his army was defeated at Plataea. All of this occurred between chapters 1 and 2 of the Book of Esther. He came home a bitter and angry man and sought to find relief for his wounded pride by enjoying his harem. It was at this time that Esther entered the picture. Xerxes was assassinated in August 465.
2. Prophecies about Greece (Dan. 11:3–4)
From the previous visions, Daniel already knew the sequence of the great empires.
The image (chap. 2)
Vision (chap. 7)
Vision (chap. 8)



Babylon—head of gold

lion






medo-Persia—arms and chest of silver

bear

ram




Greece—belly and thigh of bronze

leopard

goat




Rome—legs of iron, feet of clay

terrible beast






The mighty king of 11:3 is, of course, Alexander the Great, who was determined to punish the Persians for Xerxes’ invasion. We have already met Alexander and know about his vast army and his lightning-like conquest of the nations. Indeed, he did what he pleased and nobody could stand in his way. In 332, Alexander defeated the Persians and in 323 he died and his kingdom was divided among four of his generals.
Once again, Alexander’s incredible conquests were part of the sovereign plan of God. The spread of the Greek language and Greek culture assisted in the eventual spread of the Gospel and the Greek New Testament. Alexander’s goal was not just to conquer territory but to bring people together in a “united empire.” His soldiers married women from the conquered nations, and Alexander’s empire became a “melting pot” for all peoples. This too assisted in the spread of the Gospel centuries later.
3. The kings of the north and the south (Dan. 11:5–20)
The nations here are Egypt (south) and Syria (north), and the rulers change regularly. The little nation of Israel was caught between these two great powers and was affected by their conflicts. All of these people and events may not be interesting to you, but the prophecies Daniel recorded tally with the record of history, thus proving that God’s Word can be trusted. The Ptolemy line provided the rulers in Egypt, and the Seleucid line the rulers in the north (Syria). These paragraphs are merely summary statements, but if you read them in the light of the related verses, you will see how Daniel’s prophecies were fulfilled. Along with reading your kjv, you may also want to read these verses in the nasb or the niv.
V. 5—Ptolemy I Soter and Seleucus I Nicator. Seleucus was the stronger of the two and ruled over a large empire, but it was his alliance with Ptolemy that enabled him to seize the throne of Syria.
V. 6—Ptolemy II Philadelphus and Antiochus II Theos. As was often done in the days of monarchies, the rulers used marriage as a means of forming strong political alliances, a policy Solomon had followed (1 Kings 3:1; 11:1ff). However, Ptolemy demanded that Antiochus divorce his wife Laodice in order to marry his daughter Berenice. Ptolemy died after two years, so Seleucus took back his former wife, who then murdered both him and Berenice. It was one marriage where they all didn’t live happily ever after. “She will not retain her power, and he and his power will not last” (Dan. 11:6, niv).
Vv. 7–9—Ptolemy III Euergetes and Seleucus II Callinicus. The new king of Egypt was the brother of Berenice, and he was intent on defending his sister’s honor and avenging her death. He attacked the northern power, won the victory, and collected a great deal of wealth. Then the two kings ignored each other for some years until Seleucus attacked Egypt in 240, was defeated, and had to return home in shame. He was killed by a fall from his horse and his son Seleucus III Soter took the throne, only to be assassinated four years later. Antiochus III the Great, who ruled from 223 to 187, succeeded him.
Vv. 10–19—Ptolemy IV Philopater and Antiochus III the Great. The sons of Seleucus II were Seleucus III, who was a successful general but was killed in battle, and Antiochus III the Great, who carried out the Syrian military program with great skill. He regained lost territory from Egypt, but in 217 the Egyptian army defeated the Syrians. This didn’t stop Antiochus, for he took his army east and got as far as India.
In 201, Antiochus mustered another large army, joined forces with Philip V of Macedon, and headed for Egypt (vv. 13–16), where he won a great victory against Ptolemy V Epiphanes. Contrary to God’s law, but in fulfillment of the prophecies (vision), some of the Jews in Palestine joined with Antiochus, hoping to break free of Egyptian control; but their revolt was crushed (v. 14). Antiochus not only conquered Egypt and Sidon (v. 15), but also “the glorious land” of Palestine (v. 16).
Once again marriage enters the scene. Antiochus offered to negotiate with the Egyptian leaders and to marry his daughter Cleopatra I to Ptolemy V, who was seven years old at the time! He hoped that his daughter would undermine the Egyptian government from within and use her position to help him take over. However, Cleopatra was loyal to her husband, so the marriage stratagem didn’t succeed.
Antiochus decided to attack Greece but was defeated at Thermopylae (191) and Magnesia (189). The “prince on his own behalf” (v. 18) was the Roman consul and general Lucius Cornelius Scipio Asiaticus who led the Roman and Greek forces to victory over Antiochus. At an earlier meeting, Antiochus had insulted the Roman general, but the Romans had the last word. The Syrian leader died in 187 and his successor was his son Seleucus IV Philopator, who oppressed the Jewish people by raising taxes so he could pay tribute to Rome. Shortly after he sent his treasurer Heliodorus to plunder the Jewish temple, Seleucus Philopator suddenly died (probably poisoned), thus fulfilling verse 20. This opened the way for the wicked Antiochus Epiphanes to seize the throne.
As you review the history of the relationship between Egypt and Syria, and the family relationships among the Seleucids, you can’t help but realize that human nature hasn’t changed over these thousands of years. The ancient world had its share of intrigue, political deception, violence, greed, and war. The lust for power and wealth drove men and women to violate human rights and break divine laws, to go to any length to get what they wanted. They slaughtered thousands of innocent people, plundered the helpless, and even killed their own relatives, just to wear a crown or sit on a throne.
While God is not responsible for the evil that men and women have done in the name of government and religion, He is still the Lord of history and continues to work out His plans for mankind. Studying the evil deeds of past rulers could make us cynical, but we must remember that one day “the earth shall be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea” (Hab. 2:14).2

2. Daniel’s Vision of the Seventy Weeks (9:20–27)
9:20–23. While Daniel was still praying, the angel Gabriel appeared for a second time in the book of Daniel (8:16). Here he is called a man, not an angel, because he appeared in human form. He arrived at about the time when the evening offering would have been offered had the temple still stood, or between 3 and 4 p.m. Gabriel came immediately in response to Daniel’s fervent and humble prayer because God highly esteemed Daniel.
9:24. The vision Gabriel recounted referred to a sum total of seventy weeks, which some have interpreted as a symbolic number. However, in the context, at the opening of the chapter, Daniel recognized that the 70-year captivity referred to literal time (9:2). Therefore, it is more likely that the 70 weeks also refer to a literal number.
The word weeks in Hebrew refers to a unit of seven, or a heptad, with its meaning determined by the context. Sometimes it refers to a period of seven days but here it denotes a period of seven years. The reasons for this are (1) that in this context Daniel was concerned with years not days (9:2); (2) that in the Hebrew of Dn 10:2–3, Daniel specified that he was fasting for “three entire weeks” to distinguish from the weeks of years described in the previous paragraph (9:24–27); (3) that the broken covenant of the 70th week leaves three and one-half periods of desolation and destruction, and this amount of time is described as three and one-half years in parallel passages (7:25; 12:7; Rv 12:14).
Why did the message of the angel, pertaining to 490 future years, come when Daniel was pondering the end of the 70-year captivity? Judah’s captivity lasted 70 years because the nation had failed to keep the sabbatical rest of the land 70 times (Lv 26:34–35, 43). Thus, 70 years of captivity provided the land with the 70 Sabbatical rests it had missed (2Ch 36:21). Therefore, the context of Daniel’s considerations was not merely the 70-year captivity but the cause of that length of time, namely, 70 weeks of years (i.e., 490 years) when the land had not experienced its rest. While Daniel’s prayer was focused on the past period of 70 weeks of years and the end of the 70-year captivity, the angel came with a message about the future, also about a period of 70 weeks of years. (See the chart “Daniel’s Vision of the 70 Weeks.”)
By the completion of the 490-year period, six objectives would be accomplished in a comprehensive way. The first three objectives pertain to dealing with sin: first, finishing transgression refers to bringing an end to Israel’s history of rebellion against God; making an end of sin brings it to a halt by final judgment; and making atonement for iniquity refers to the Messiah’s once for all death for sin. The final three relate to consummating prophetic events by bringing in a kingdom of everlasting righteousness, fulfilling all vision and prophecy, and setting apart the most holy place (lit., the holy of holies), referring to a yet future, literal, millennial temple (cf. Ezk. 40–48). All six of the purposes will be fulfilled completely for Israel by the time of the return of the Messiah and the establishment of the messianic kingdom.
9:25. The first part of the prophecy predicts that from a particular future starting point until the coming of the Messiah the Prince, there would be 69 weeks of years. The Hebrew word mashiach (Messiah) is commonly and accurately translated as “anointed.” It is used 39 times in the Hebrew Bible, generally with another noun, such as “the anointed priest.” The word also has a technical meaning, commonly translated as “the Messiah” and defined by W. H. Rose as “a future royal figure sent by God who will bring salvation to God’s people and the world and establish a kingdom characterized by features such as peace and justice” (W. H. Rose, “Messiah,” in Dictionary of the Old Testament: Pentateuch, edited by T. Desmond Alexander and David W. Baker [Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2003], 566). Although some believe that the term did not develop this technical meaning until after the close of the OT canon, this is not so. Besides its specialized usage here and in 9:26, there are at least 10 other OT passages that use the technical term “Messiah” (1Sm 2:10, 35; 2Sm 22:51; 23:1; Pss 2:2; 20:6; 28:8; 84:9; 89:51; Hab 3:13; see Michael Rydelnik, The Messianic Hope: Is the Old Testament Really Messianic? [Nashville: B&H Publishers, 2010], 2–3). Here the Messiah has the additional title, “the Prince.” The Hebrew word means “ruler” or “leader” and derives from the idea of “one who goes before.”
Some have argued (Pate and Haines, Doomsday Delusions, 73) that the word “anointed” cannot have a technical messianic sense in this context since it lacks the definite article. They have also maintained that the word “anointed” is more suitable for describing a priest (Lv 4:3). Furthermore, they assert that the word “prince” is also used of a priest (Neh 11:11; Jr 20:1). Thus, they conclude that this verse refers to Joshua, son of Jehozadak, the high priest after the captivity.
However, in Hebrew, proper nouns, names, or titles such as “Anointed One” or “Messiah” need not have the article. Furthermore, the Hebrew word mashiach was not used of a high priest “beyond the Mosaic period and whenever it was used it was always clarified by juxtaposition with the word ‘priest’ ” (J. Paul Tanner, “Is Daniel’s Seventy-Weeks Prophecy Messianic? Part 2” BibSac 166 [July–Sept 2009], 323)—like “the anointed priest.” And while the word “prince” may be used of a priest, it is a rare usage (only three of 43 times). In fact, it is used in a prediction of the coming Messiah in Is 55:4. For these reasons, throughout the history of interpretation, overwhelmingly, the Church has understood “mashiach nagid” to refer to the Messiah the Prince. Ancient Judaism also understood this passage as messianic. According to the Talmud (AD sixth-century rabbinic writing), when, in the first century BC, Jonathon ben Uzziel wanted to write a Targum (paraphrastic commentary) on the Writings (including Daniel), it was said that the Bat Kol (voice of heaven) stopped him, because Daniel contained the fixed date of Messiah’s coming (Megillah 3a). Although this is merely a legendary account, it demonstrates that ancient Rabbis interpreted Dn 9:24–27 as of the Messiah. It seems that only tendentious interpretation, seeking to avoid the messianic understanding, explains it otherwise.
The starting point of the prophecy is from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem. Some scholars who seek to minimize the messianic predictions of the OT maintain that the word “decree” is literally “word” and therefore refers to Jeremiah’s prophetic word (Jr 30:18–22; 31:38–40) issued in 587 BC about Jerusalem’s restoration (Pate and Haines, Doomsday Delusion, 72–73). This would see the fulfillment in 538 BC with Joshua the high priest under Zerubbabel. However, the Hebrew word for “decree” is debar, which means “a word” or “thing.” In this context, it is used in the general sense of a word from a king, i.e., a decree, and in no way requires the interpretation of a “word” from the Lord or a prophet. Second, the passages cited from Jeremiah do not refer to the return from captivity but are eschatological, looking forward to the end-time restoration of Israel. Third, it is entirely arbitrary to choose 587 BC as the date that Jeremiah gave his oracle. In fact, even if Dn 9:25 referred to Jeremiah’s prophetic word, the dating in Jr 29:1–3 indicates that the year was 597 BC, making the proposed fulfillment ten years late. Finally, at the outset of this chapter, it is clear that Daniel does not have these verses from Jeremiah in view but rather, Jr 25:11–13; 29:10, which speak of a 70-year, not a 49-year captivity.
Among those who interpret this passage as referring to Messiah, some identify this with Cyrus’s decree allowing the captives to return (2Ch 36:22–23; Ezr 1:1–3) in 539/538 BC and interpret the 69 weeks of years symbolically. Thus, the period of time from the decree until the coming of the Messiah is merely described as a symbolic length of time. Three factors make this interpretation especially problematic. First, Cyrus’s decree was for the captives to return to the Holy Land from Persia, not for the restoration of Jerusalem. Second, Daniel understands Jeremiah’s prediction of the 70 years of captivity to be literal years and so calls into doubt treating these numbers symbolically. Third, there would be no significance to this prediction since any amount of time could be used to fulfill it.
Others suggest that the starting point is Artaxerxes’ first decree in 457 BC (Ezr 7:11–26) and calculate that the 69 weeks (483 years) were fulfilled at Jesus’ baptism, when He began His public ministry. However, this particular decree only provided a call for more exiles to return, the restoration of the temple’s utensils, and permission to appoint civil leaders (Ezk 7:11–26). It did include the most essential element mentioned here, namely, a decree for the restoration and rebuilding of Jerusalem.
The most likely starting point was Artaxerxes’ second decree in 444 BC, authorizing Nehemiah to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem (Neh 2:1–8). This decree fits the requirement of the prediction since it was indeed for the restoration of Jerusalem. Moreover, the restoration was carried out in times of distress just as Daniel predicted (v. 25) and Nehemiah described (Neh 4:1–6:14).
The calculation of the prophecy is as follows: There will be a period of seven weeks of years (49 years) followed by sixty-two weeks of years (434 years), making a total of 69 weeks of years or 483 years from the decree until the coming of Messiah the Prince. The seven-week period (49 years) most likely pertains to the time it actually took from the issuing of the decree until the restoration of Jerusalem. The total of 483 years (69 weeks) should be calculated as specific biblical/prophetic years of 360 days each. The starting point of the prophecy would have begun on Nisan 1 (March 5), 444 BC, followed by 69 weeks of 360 day years or 173,880 days, and culminated on Nisan 10 (March 30), AD 33, the date of Jesus the Messiah’s triumphal entry (Lk 19:28–40) (cf. Harold W. Hoehner, “Daniel’s Seventy Weeks and New Testament Chronology,” in Chronological Aspects of the Life of Christ [Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1977], 115–139).
Those who seek to reject the messianic interpretation deny that the seven weeks and the 62 weeks are consecutive, totaling 69 weeks of years. Rather, they maintain that a Hebrew disjunctive accent mark (called an athnach) requires the two periods to be concurrent. Then, they date the beginning of the 62 weeks in 605 BC and see its fulfillment 434 years (62×7) later in 171 BC when Onias III, the high priest was murdered (Pate and Haines, Doomsday Delusions, 73).
In response, it seems that they build far too much on an extremely small accent. First, the Hebrew accents were added quite late—AD 800–1000—and were not part of the inspired Hebrew text. Second, the ancient versions (LXX, Theodotion, Symmachus, the Peshitta, Syriac, Vulgate) do not reflect the disjunctive accent found in the Hebrew text but treat the seven- and 62-week periods as a single period of 69 weeks. Third, although the scribes who added the accents and vowels faithfully followed Jewish tradition, it is likely that in the Rabbinic and Church Fathers eras (second-third centuries AD), polemical interaction between Christians and Jews over the messiahship of Jesus led to the adaptation of the Jewish understanding of messianic texts such as this one. It is likely that, at that time, Jewish interpreters added the disjunctive accent to avoid the identification of Jesus as Messiah the Prince. Several centuries later, Jewish scribes, seeking to consolidate the Hebrew text, incorporated the accent as the tradition that they received into the Hebrew Bible as it stands now (Roger T. Beckwith, “Daniel 9 and the Date of Messiah’s Coming in Essene, Hellenistic, Pharisaic, Zealot and Early Christian Computation,” Revue de Qumrani 10 [1979–81]: 541); Rydelnik, The Messianic Hope, 35–36). Thus, it is better to view, with all the ancient versions, the seven- and 62-week periods as one single 69-week period. The reason the 69 weeks were divided into two continuous periods was to recognize the purpose of the original decree (to restore and rebuild Jerusalem) and identify the completion of the rebuilding of Jerusalem at the end of the seven weeks of years.
9:26. The second feature of the prophecy is to predict several events that would follow the seven weeks and the sixty-two weeks (or the total of 69 weeks). First, the Messiah would be cut off, a prediction of the death of the Messiah. Thus, the book of Daniel, written in the sixth century BC, contains predictions not only of the precise date of the Messiah’s coming (9:25) but also of the Messiah’s death sometime before the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. This was fulfilled when Jesus the Messiah was crucified in AD 33 (AD 30 according to some interpreters, a date, however, that does not easily fit the historical conditions at the time of Jesus’ death). Second, the people of the prince who is to come would destroy the city of Jerusalem and the second temple. The prince who is to come is distinct from Messiah the Prince but instead is a reference to the future ruler described as the little horn in Dn 7, also known as the beast or the antichrist. He, himself, will not be the one who destroys Jerusalem and the temple, but rather it is his people who will do it. Since previously Daniel (cf. 7:7–8) viewed this ruler as coming from the fourth major world power, or Rome, this prophecy predicts that the Romans would destroy Jerusalem, as they did in AD 70. Third, there appears to be a significant time gap from the end of the 69th week to the beginning of the 70th week, as is common in prophecy. The beginning of the 70th week is yet future.
9:27. The third part of the prophecy is the prediction of the final seven-year period, or the 70th week, which will begin when he (the coming prince or the antichrist) will make a firm covenant of peace with the many in the leadership of Israel. Although some consider this prince to be Christ, establishing the new covenant and ending the OT sacrificial system, it is inconceivable that Messiah would be the one who would commit the abomination of desolation. Therefore, he is more accurately identified as the antichrist, who will desecrate the future temple and stop worship in it. This covenant is yet future and will mark the beginning of a time of oppression of the Jewish people called “the time of Jacob’s distress” (Jr 30:7) or the tribulation period (Mt 24:29; Mk 13:24). In the middle of the week, or after the first three and one-half years, the antichrist will break his covenant with Israel, leading to a time of unprecedented persecution of the Jewish people (Mt 24:21; Mk 13:19) as well as followers of Jesus (Rv 7:14) that will last for another three and one-half years (Dn 7:25; Rv 11:2–3; 12:14; 13:5).
When the antichrist breaks his covenant, he will also put a stop to sacrifice in the yet-to-be rebuilt temple (Dn 7:25). In desecrating the temple and declaring himself to be God (2Th 2:4; Rv 13:5–7), he is said to be one who comes on the wing of abominations and makes desolate (or as the one who commits “the abomination of desolation” (see the comments on Mt 24:15 for evidence supporting the as-yet future fulfillment of the abomination, and the unlikely fulfillment either under Antiochus or in 70 AD). The Antichrist’s oppression and abominations will continue until God’s decree of a complete destructionis poured out on the one who makes desolate (11:45; Rv 19:20).
A few evangelicals have identified the coming Prince, not as the antichrist but Antiochus Epiphanes, leaving open the possibility that there would be multiple fulfillments of the same prediction, including Titus in AD 70 and the future antichrist (Pate and Haines, Doomsday Delusion, 74–75). However, this contradicts a basic interpretive rule that any biblical text has only one intended meaning. Second, when Jesus spoke of “the abomination of desolation” after the time of Antiochus, he viewed it as yet future (Mt 24:15). Finally, although Antiochus did indeed desecrate the second temple as a prefiguration of the future antichrist (Dn 11:31), in this verse it speaks of a desecration after the destruction of the second temple (9:26). Therefore, this indicates that the one who makes desolate will do so in a yet future temple, not the one that Antiochus defiled and Titus destroyed. Finally, the figure here is linked to the little horn of chap. 7. In Dn 9:27, this one who makes desolate breaks his covenant in the middle of the 70th week, leading to three and one-half years before the decreed final judgment is poured out on him. In Dn 7:25, the little horn carries out his oppression of Israel for three and one-half years. Significantly, after the judgment of the little horn, his dominion will be destroyed (7:26) and replaced by the messianic kingdom (7:27), an event not yet fulfilled in the defeats of Antiochus or Titus. Thus, identifying the one who makes desolate with Antiochus does not fit the context and literary evidence of the book of Daniel.
Daniel’s concern at the outset of the chapter was God’s restoration of the people of Israel to the land of Israel after 70 years of captivity. But God’s concern was not with the past or present but with the future. Therefore, he sent an angel with a message about His prophetic program for Israel, including the Messiah’s advent, death, return, and the restoration of Israel. Much like Daniel, followers of Messiah can become frustrated at the decay, desecration and corruption of contemporary society and long for God to take action immediately. Nevertheless, those who have trusted in Jesus can be encouraged that God has the big picture in view and that He will certainly fulfill His prophetic calendar and establish His kingdom on earth.
  1. Daniel and His Final Vision (10:1–12:13)3


PROPHECY OF THE SEVENTY WEEKS
Now here is the prophecy delivered by Gabriel which makes this chapter of such great importance in the study of eschatology.
And he informed me, and talked with me, and said, O Daniel, I am now come forth to give thee skill and understanding.
At the beginning of thy supplications the commandment came forth, and I am come to shew thee; for thou art greatly beloved: therefore understand the matter, and consider the vision [Dan. 9:22–23].
Notice that Daniel gets an immediate answer to his prayer. I heard Dr. Gaebelein say that it took him three minute to read Daniel’s prayer in Hebrew. By the time Daniel finished his prayer, the angel Gabriel was there. So Dr. Gaebelein reasoned and explained with a twinkle in his eye, “It took Gabriel three minutes to get from heaven to earth.” Of course, if Daniel had his eyes closed while he was praying, it may be that Gabriel was standing on one foot and then on the other for two minutes, waiting for Daniel to get finished. The Lord God has promised, “And it shall come to pass, that before they call, I will answer; and while they are yet speaking, I will hear” (Isa. 65:24).
Note that Daniel was “greatly beloved” in heaven. That is wonderful. The believer in Jesus Christ is seen by God as being in Christ. According to Ephesians 1:6 we are accepted in the Beloved—so the believer is loved in heaven because he is in Christ.
Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy [Dan. 9:24].
Seventy weeks” does not mean weeks of seven days any more than it means weeks of seven years or seven other periods of time. The Hebrew word for “seven” is shabua, meaning “a unit of measure.” It would be comparable to our word dozen. When it stands alone, it could be a dozen of anything—a dozen eggs, a dozen bananas. So here, Seventy Weeks means seventy sevens. It could be seventy sevens of anything. It could be units of days or months or years. In the context of this verse it is plain that Daniel has been reading in Jeremiah about years, seventy years. Jeremiah had been preaching and writing that the captivity would be for seventy years. The seventy years of captivity were the specific penalty for violating seventy sabbatic years. That would be seventy sevens, a total of 490 years. In those 490 years, Israel had violated exactly seventy sabbatic years; so they would go into captivity for seventy years. “To fulfil the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah, until the land had enjoyed her sabbaths: for as long as she lay desolate she kept sabbath, to fulfil threescore and ten years” (2 Chron. 36:21).
1 week = 7 years
70 weeks = 490 years
70 weeks divided into 3 periods:
7 weeks—62 weeks—1 week
Now Daniel was puzzled as to how the end of the seventy years of captivity would fit into the long period of Gentile world dominion which the visions in chapters 7 and 8 had so clearly indicated. He obviously thought that at the end of the seventy years his people would be returned to the land, the promised Messiah would come, and the Kingdom which had been promised to David would be established. How could both be true? It appeared to him, I am sure, to be an irreconcilable situation created by these seemingly contradictory prophecies.
The Seventy Weeks, or the seventy sevens, answer two questions. Israel’s kingdom will not come immediately. The seventy sevens must run their course. These seventy sevens fit into the Times of the Gentiles and run concurrently with them. They are broken up to fit into gentile times. The word for determined literally means “cutting off.” These seventy sevens are to be cut off, as the following verses will indicate. The seventy sevens for Israel and the Times of the Gentiles will both come to an end at the same time, that is, at the second coming of Christ. This is important to know for the correct understanding of the prophecy.
The Seventy Weeks concern “thy people,” meaning the people of Daniel. That would be Israel. And they concern “the holy city,” which can be none other than Jerusalem. Six things are to be accomplished in those Seventy Weeks or 490 years. We will see as we progress in our study that sixty–nine of those “weeks” have already passed, and one “week” is yet to be fulfilled.
Here are the six things to be accomplished:
1. “To finish the transgression.” This refers to the transgression of Israel. The cross provided the redemption for sin—for the sin of the nation, but not all accepted it. Today the word has gone out to the ends of the earth that there is a redemption for mankind. But in that last “week” we are told that God says, “And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications …” (Zech. 12:10). And in Zechariah 13:1: “In that day there shall be a fountain opened to the house of David and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem for sin and for uncleanness.” That has not been opened yet. All you have to do is to look at the land of Israel and you will know this has not been fulfilled.
2. “To make an end of sins.” The national sins of Israel will come to an end at the second coming of Christ. They are just like any other people or any other nation. They are sinners as individuals and as a nation. They have made many mistakes as a nation (so have we), but God will make an end to that.
3. “To make reconciliation for iniquity.” During this period of Seventy Weeks, God has provided a redemption through the death and resurrection of Christ. This, of course, is for Jew and Gentile alike.
4. “And to bring in everlasting righteousness” refers to the return of Christ at the end of the 490 years to establish the Kingdom.
5. “To seal up the vision and prophecy” means that all will be fulfilled, which will vindicate this prophecy as well as all other prophecies in Scripture.
6. “To anoint the most Holy” has reference to the anointing of the holy of holies in the millennial temple about which Ezekiel spoke (Ezek. 41–46).
Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.
And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the


overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate [Dan. 9:25–27].
The starting point for this period of 490 years is essential to the correct understanding of the prophecy. Since this period is projected into the Times of the Gentiles, it must fit into secular history and originate from some date connected with the Times of the Gentiles. Of course there have been many suggestions for a starting point: the decree of Cyrus (see Ezra 1:1–4); the decree of Darius (see Ezra 6:1–12); the decree of Artaxerxes—at the seventh year of his reign (Ezra 7:11–26); but I feel that the decree of Artaxerxes in the twentieth year of his reign (Neh. 2:1–8) meets the requirements of verse 25. The commandment to rebuild the city of Jerusalem was issued in the month Nisan 445 b.c. That, then, will **be our starting point.
The first seven weeks of forty–nine years bring us to 397 b.c. and to Malachi and the end of the Old Testament. These were “troublous times,” as witnessed by both Nehemiah and Malachi.
Sixty–two weeks, or 434 years, bring us to the Messiah. Sir Robert Anderson in his book, The Coming Prince, has worked out the time schedule. From the first of the month Nisan to the tenth of Nisan (April 6) b.c. 32, is 173,880 days. Dividing them according to the Jewish year of 360 days, he arrives at 483 years (69 sevens). On this day Jesus rode into Jerusalem, offering Himself for the first time, publicly and officially, as the Messiah.
After the 69 weeks, or 483 years, there is a time break. Between the sixty–ninth and Seventieth Week two events of utmost importance are to take place:
1. Messiah will be cut off. This was the crucifixion of Christ, the great mystery and truth of the gospel: “From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day” (Matt. 16:21). “That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life” (John 3:15).
2. Destruction of Jerusalem, which took place in b.c. 70, when Titus the Roman was the instrument.
The final “week” (the seventieth), a period of seven years, is projected into the future and does not follow chronologically the other sixty–nine. The time gap between the sixty–ninth and seventieth weeks is the age of grace—unknown to the prophets (Eph. 3:1–12; 1 Pet. 1:10–12). The Seventieth Week is eschatological; it is the final period and is yet unfulfilled.
The prince” is a Roman; he is the “little horn” of Daniel 7; he is “the beast” of Revelation 13. After the church is removed from the earth, he will make a covenant with Israel. Israel will accept him as her Messiah, but in the midst of the “week” he will break his covenant by placing an image in the temple (Rev. 13). This is the abomination of desolation. What Israel thought to be the Millennium will turn out to be the Great Tribulation (Matt. 24:15–26). Only the coming of Christ can end this frightful period (Matt. 24:27–31).
My friend, you and I are living in the age of grace, and the Seventieth Week of Daniel, the Great Tribulation, as the Lord Jesus called it, is yet to take place.
4

1 McGee, J. V. (1991). Thru the Bible commentary: The Prophets (Daniel) (electronic ed., Vol. 26, pp. 184–186). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
2 Wiersbe, W. W. (2000). Be resolute (pp. 130–136). Colorado Springs, CO: Victor.
3 Rydelnik, M. A. (2014). Daniel. In M. A. Rydelnik & M. Vanlaningham (Eds.), The moody bible commentary (pp. 1304–1308). Chicago, IL: Moody Publishers.
4 McGee, J. V. (1991). Thru the Bible commentary: The Prophets (Daniel) (electronic ed., Vol. 26, pp. 152–158). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.