Thursday, August 27, 2015

YOUR GOING TO SUFFER

PERSECUTION — the hatred and affliction that follows the witness and holy life of God’s people in a hostile world. The concept is stressed in many of the Old Testament prophetic books, such as Isaiah. The New Testament also teaches that God’s people will suffer persecution. Jesus taught that God’s prophets always faced persecution (Matt. 5:12); so His disciples should expect the same (Matt. 10:23).
In the early church, two ideas were taken over from Judaism to express the meaning of persecution. The Jewish theologians taught that the death of the righteous sufferer had redemptive value. While this idea was applied primarily to Jesus by the early Christians, the persecution of His followers was seen as a participation in Jesus’ suffering: filling up “what is lacking in the afflictions of Christ” (Col. 1:24). A good statement of this is that of Tertullian: “The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church.”
The idea of the coming Messiah held that the suffering of God’s people was part of the coming of the kingdom—evidence that a person is truly one of God’s own. Therefore they are “blessed” (Matt. 5:10) and should “rejoice” and “glorify God” since “the time has come for judgment to begin at the house of God” (1 Pet. 4:13–17).
Jewish opposition to Christianity arose primarily among the Sadducees (Acts 4:1; 5:17). At first the common people and the Pharisees did not oppose the church strongly (Acts 5:14, 34; 23:6). The first persecution came because Stephen spoke out about the inadequacy of the land of Israel and the Temple for salvation. This intensified when the apostle Paul began to proclaim the salvation of the Gentiles through Jesus Christ alone. Both Jew and Christian began to realize that the two were now separate religions, rather than sects of a single religion.
Roman opposition to Christianity also developed gradually. The Book of Acts emphasized Roman tolerance for the new religion. But this began to change with the Jewish riots against Christians in Rome, resulting in the Emperor Claudius banning both groups from Rome in a.d. 49. This set the stage for the intense opposition of later years that allowed Nero to make Christians the scapegoats for the fire that leveled Rome in a.d. 64. During this persecution the apostles Paul and Peter were martyred.1

10 “God blesses those who are persecuted because they live for God, for the Kingdom of Heaven is theirs.” Persecution should not surprise Christians. People who put others before themselves will seldom receive applause and honors. Often, they will be persecuted instead. Because they live for God, they stand out from the world and become marks for enemy attacks. The world is under Satan’s control, and believers belong to the opposing army. The reward for these believers will be the Kingdom of Heaven. God will make up for the suffering that his children have undergone because of their loyalty to him.
5:11 “God blesses you when you are mocked and persecuted and lied about because you are my followers.” Jesus was telling his disciples that they shouldn’t be surprised when people mock them, persecute them, and lie about them. Jesus would face such treatment. Later, he explained to his followers that they should expect nothing different (10:18; 24:9; John 15:20).
5:12 Jesus described the way the disciples should respond to persecution: “Be happy about it! Be very glad!” This refers to deep, spiritual joy that is unhindered and unchanged by what happens in this present life. A person with righteous character can rejoice and be glad because of the promise: a great reward awaits you in heaven. The persecution will pale in comparison to the great reward.
Besides that, the disciples had good company: the ancient prophets were persecuted, too. Jesus placed his disciples in a long line of God’s followers who lived righteously and spoke truthfully—only to suffer for it. Jesus explained that to live and speak for God in the face of unjust persecution, as the ancient prophets did, would bring great reward in heaven.2

sed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven” (v. 10). Notice that this beatitude does not say that persecution for just anything is blessed. People all over the world experience persecution of all kinds, but not always for the sake of righteousness. Peter writes, “It is better, if it is the will of God, to suffer for doing good than for doing evil” (1 Pet. 3:17). In other words, it is one thing to suffer because we have done evil, but it is quite another thing to suffer for doing what is right. In that regard we are merely seeking to be imitators of Jesus, who suffered perhaps more hostility, loathing, and persecution than any individual in the history of the world, and yet every ounce of His suffering was altogether for the sake of righteousness.
Righteous behavior provokes persecution because the unrighteous in this world cannot stand to behold righteousness. Those who hated Jesus most fiercely were the Pharisees because they had a public pretense of righteousness that was not real. Their sin chiefly involved hypocrisy, because while they pretended righteousness they were in fact unrighteous, and they, in their pretense of righteousness, crucified the Son of glory. Nothing exposes the counterfeit faster than the authentic. When true righteousness appeared in the person of Jesus, the false righteousness of the Pharisees was exposed for what it was, and they hated it.
I once had a student with a 4.0 grade-point average, which in those days was the highest there could be. She was brilliant, and her grade-point average broke the curve. As she broke the curve I noticed that the rest of the students did not applaud her. In fact, they did not like it and tended to scorn her. In the second semester of her senior year I gave her an examination that she failed. I told her I thought that she had failed the test deliberately, and she began to cry. She admitted that she had done just that because none of the men wanted to date her; they all thought she was too smart. She made a pretense of failure in order to be accepted. This woman in her way had suffered for doing what was right.
The same thing happens when Christians refrain from participating in worldly activities. Even if you say nothing outright against the activities, those who participate in them will look at you askance and call you “holier than thou.” That kind of persecution is hardly the same as that experienced worldwide for the sake of Christ. People lose their jobs and their lives if they so much as publicly declare their allegiance to Jesus. There are different levels of persecution, yet no Christian can go through life without receiving some form of it. Jesus goes into greater detail in the next beatitude.
Reviled for Christ’s Sake
Blessed are you when they revile and persecute you, and say all kinds of evil against you falsely for My sake” (v. 11). Our Lord has in view here the type of persecution that includes slander. People so persecuted are reviled and falsely accused, and their reputations become tarnished. Again, we are not promised blessing just because people speak evil against us; the blessing is promised when these things happen for Jesus’ sake.
For the sake of Jesus, have you ever been slandered or falsely accused? Has anyone ever falsely accused you for the sake of Jesus? If you have experienced that, you know how painful it can be. Our reputations are precious to us, and it is difficult to be accused of things that we have not done or of saying things that we have not said. How can that be an occasion for blessedness? Jesus tells us: “Rejoice and be exceedingly glad, for great is your reward in heaven” (v. 12).
As a student I was once selected by the seminary to give a sermon in chapel on a special occasion. It was an annual event at which the entire presbytery convened. There were ministers present from about two hundred churches, along with the student body of the seminary and the faculty. It was a great honor to be selected to deliver the sermon. I chose to preach on the doctrine of sin, and in the sermon I explained what I had been taught at seminary about sin—that sin is an existential failure to achieve authentic existence. I’d been taught that sin in the final analysis is simply a matter of finitude, a necessary component of creatureliness, and a psychological malady. Then I told the audience that while I agree that we struggle in all these ways, not one of them comes close to the biblical understanding of the nature of sin. According to Scripture, sin is a violation of the holiness of God. Sin is a transgression of His law, and such transgression cannot be minimized by explaining it away in psychological categories of neurosis or in existential categories of inauthenticity or by reducing it simply to finitude.
When the sermon was finished, I stepped down from the pulpit, and a rush of students came toward me. The students, most of them liberal thinkers, came to me moved and excited about the sermon. I was amazed. I thought they would want to tar and feather me. However, not everyone was happy. As I made my way to the back of the chapel, the dean of the seminary approached me, and he was irate. In fact, his face was contorted with rage. He began to yell at me in front of the crowd, and he physically pushed me up against the back of the wall and said, “You have distorted every truth of Protestantism in that sermon this morning.” I was devastated, and I walked out of the chapel and wondered if I had really made such distortions.
I went to see my mentor, John Gerstner. When I told him what had happened, he grinned and said, “You should be exceedingly glad.” I told him that I did not feel exceedingly glad, and he replied, “Every Calvinist from John Calvin to B. B. Warfield is rejoicing in heaven this morning for what they heard out of that pulpit. You are blessed because you have just been reviled for Christ’s sake.” I certainly did not feel blessed, but in a small way, I was able to experience the wrath of men for the sake of the truth of God.
Rewards
The concept of rewards is something with which we often struggle. We put so much emphasis on justification by faith rather than by works that we sometimes despise the works we might be able to achieve. How can we reconcile the truth that Christ is our only merit with our receiving great reward in heaven? There are at least twenty-five texts in the New Testament that teach that rewards in heaven will be distributed by Christ according to our works. We get to heaven by faith alone, but the reward we experience once we are there is based upon the works that we do in this world. Therefore, those who are justified are called to live fruitful, godly lives that produce good works, and those works will receive a heavenly reward.
Augustine said that when God rewards us for our works, even those works are so tainted by sin that they are at best splendid vices. The best work we do will not deserve a reward in heaven. Nevertheless, even though we do not deserve it, we will receive it. When God distributes rewards in heaven, He will be crowning His own gifts, which means that God is the one who has gifted you to do the work you do. It is only by grace that you are able to do it.
The reward promised is a future one, although if we look at the last clause of this beatitude, we see that there is a present reward: “for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you” (v. 12). If you have been slandered in this world for the sake of Christ, for righteousness’ sake, you will indeed receive a great reward when you get to heaven, but even now you will be numbered among the prophets of the Old Testament. Even now, in God’s sight, you are included in the select company of those who have gone before and tasted the same slander. If you have experienced this, you are in the company of Isaiah, Jeremiah, and all the prophets before you. That is splendid company in which to be numbered. The reward is not future only but comes to us even now, if we understand the blessed way in which our Lord looks at us. He sees us. He observes us. He encourages us.3

10 Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake: for their’s is the kingdom of heaven.
The men of the world judge those men very unhappy and miserable whom their rulers make the objects of their wrath and malice, and pursue violently to the loss of their estates, liberties, or lives, never considering the cause for which they are so pursued: but they are quite mistaken; for that man who is pursued by such violence, and hunted upon this account, because to please men he durst not sin against God, but labours to keep a conscience void of offence toward God, and toward men, Acts 24:16, is a blessed man; and if he be hunted out of the kingdoms of the earth, yet he shall be hunted but to heaven, for to such men belongeth the kingdom of God in glory, James 1:12; 1 Pet. 3:14; 4:13.4

What? Persecution? Maybe you thought if a person possessed a “beatitude mentality”—if he was aware of his own poverty, if he mourned over his sin, if he was meek, if he hungered and thirsted after righteousness, if he had a pure heart, if he showed mercy—he would be popular. But such is not the case, for if the attitudes of meekness and mercy, poverty of spirit and righteousness of heart are being worked out in you, you will encounter persecution. You will have enemies. You will be slandered and misunderstood because in 2 Timothy 3:12, Paul says this, “Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.” That’s a promise.
Jesus said, “Happy is the one who is persecuted. You’re joining a great company, the company of the prophets. And, indeed, you will have profit in heaven—exceedingly great reward.”
Be happy,” Jesus said, “because your reward in heaven is going to be great when men persecute you—and they will!” Notice one more thing before we leave these verses. It says, “and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.” Many times Christians are being persecuted not because they’re living righteously, but because they’re weird. Weirdness doesn’t count!
These are the attitudes that will lead to happiness and fulfillment: poverty of spirit, mourning over sin, meekness that no longer struts, but submits, hungering and thirsting for righteousness, mercy, purity of heart, peacemaking, persecution—this is the pathway to happiness.5
5:10–12 Blessed are those who have been persecuted: Jesus’ promise of blessing for persecution appears the most difficult one to accept; it also promises the greatest rewards (the first of many such promises in the NT consummating with Rev. 22:12). It seems strange, indeed. When we see people experiencing this kind of persecution, do we think, “Blessed”? Hardly! Why? Because we are not truly kingdom oriented. If we can really believe what Jesus is saying here, it will revolutionize our attitude toward trials. The truth is that our positions of service and dimensions of glory that we will enjoy in the kingdom are being determined today by how we handle the experiences of this life. It seemed contrary, in fact, to the covenant promises of material blessing for righteous living, on which the Pharisees built their materialistic view of life (Deut. 7:12–16; Ps. 84:11). Jesus clinched His point by appeal to the persecuted prophets (Heb. 11:32–40). For the first time the Lord changes from the third person, “they,” to the second person, “you.” Perhaps He is saying that if the Beatitudes are lived out in life, the Lord’s followers may expect persecution. Persecution is not unusual. Proper response is! The Beatitudes emphasize character. The Lord begins this discourse with this accent to show that being precedes doing. Sometimes it is said that a person’s character should not be at issue but only his or her ideas, viewpoints, or actions. The Beatitudes belie such a perspective. Character stands behind each of our thoughts and beliefs.6

10. As Jesus develops His message He makes it clear that such a life causes His people to be in direct contrast to the world in which they live. Therefore He reminds, Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake. The plural use of ye in verse 11 indicates that He foresaw this persecution as touching all His followers. Notice 2 Timothy 3:12, “Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.” The nature of this persecution (Gr diōkō) implies a driving or chasing away, a withstanding or keeping one from his goal. This does not mean that every Christian will necessarily suffer physical abuse as evidence of true salvation. While many Christians have sealed their faith with their blood, many more have had to withstand the social temptations and pressures of the world in order to live effectively for Christ.
11. Again, Jesus warns that men shall revile you, and persecute you. This became true during His own ministry, in the lives of the apostles and throughout the history of the church. But in Tertullian’s words, “The blood of the martyrs became the seed of the church.” The persecution spoken of here is twofold. First, it involves a physical pursuing of the persecuted and secondly a personal attack of slander against them.
    1. Rejoice is the command that grows out of the blessedness of the believer. The phrase “rejoice and be exceeding glad” means rejoice, but even more exalt! The believer who is the blessed one may not only rejoice in tribulation but he may rejoice exceedingly to the point of exaltation. Therefore, he glories in tribulation even as the Apostle Paul (cf. 2 Cor 1:3–7; 12:7–10). Great is your reward in heaven focuses attention upon the eternal, spiritual destiny of all things. If God is as real as He claims, if the Bible is true, if heaven is to be gained, then there is no temporary earthly trouble or persecution that can thwart the child of God from the eternal glory that lies ahead. In Romans 8:18, Paul proclaimed, “I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.”7
5:10. As Jesus develops His message, He clearly teaches that such a life causes His people to be in direct contrast to the world in which they live. Therefore He reminds us, Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake. The plural use of “ye” in verse 11 indicates that He foresaw this persecution as touching all His followers. Notice 2 Timothy 3:12, “Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.”
5:11. Again, Jesus warns that men shall revile you, and persecute you. This became true during His own ministry, in the lives of the apostles, and throughout the history of the church. The persecution spoken of here is twofold. First, it involves a physical pursuing of the persecuted, and second, a personal attack of slander against them.
5:12. Rejoice is the command that grows out of the blessedness of the believer. The phrase Rejoice, and be exceeding glad means even more, exult! Great is your reward in heaven focuses attention on the eternal destiny of all things. If God is as real as He claims, if the Bible is true, if heaven is to be gained, then no temporary earthly trouble or persecution can dispossess the child of God of joy in the prospect of the eternal glory that lies ahead.8

:10 Those who are persecuted are those who have been wrongly treated because of their faith. God is pleased when his people show that they value him above everything in the world, and this happens when they courageously remain faithful amid opposition for righteousness’ sake.
5:11–12 Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you … on my account. Just as Jesus experienced opposition and persecution, his disciples can expect the same. Their reward may not come on earth, but it surely will be theirs in heaven. so they persecuted the prophets. Throughout history, beginning with Cain’s murder of Abel (Gen. 4:8; cf. 1 John 3:12), there have been those who oppose God’s people.9

1 Youngblood, R. F., Bruce, F. F., & Harrison, R. K., Thomas Nelson Publishers (Eds.). (1995). In Nelson’s new illustrated Bible dictionary. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, Inc.
2 Barton, B., Comfort, P., Osborne, G., Taylor, L. K., & Veerman, D. (2001). Life Application New Testament Commentary (p. 24). Wheaton, IL: Tyndale.
3 Sproul, R. C. (2013). Matthew (pp. 91–94). Wheaton, IL: Crossway.
4 Poole, M. (1853). Annotations upon the Holy Bible (Vol. 3, p. 21). New York: Robert Carter and Brothers.
5 Courson, J. (2003). Jon Courson’s Application Commentary (p. 27). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.
6 Radmacher, E. D., Allen, R. B., & House, H. W. (1999). Nelson’s new illustrated Bible commentary (Mt 5:10–12). Nashville: T. Nelson Publishers.
7 Hindson, E. E., & Kroll, W. M. (Eds.). (1994). KJV Bible Commentary (pp. 1885–1886). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
8 King James Version study Bible . (1997). (electronic ed., Mt 5:10–12). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
9 Crossway Bibles. (2008). The ESV Study Bible (p. 1828). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

Monday, August 24, 2015

TO BE A PEACEMAKER TALK ABOUT JESUS

Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God. The Greek word used for “peacemakers” means the founders of peace. Bruce Metzger points out that the emphasis is on the verb “make.” In chapter 7, verses 1–6, Jesus gives us qualifications of the peacemaker. But above all He personified this peace in Himself. Paul writes in Ephesians 2:14–17, “For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us… . for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace; and that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby: and came and preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh” (kjv). The message of peace is the message of the gospel; for people find peace within themselves and among themselves as they enter right-relatedness with God in Christ. Such persons are known in society as “the sons of God.” The word peace, shalom in the Hebrew, is not a negative state; it denotes not simply the absence of evil, but is a positive word which has to do with the well-being of another, seeking for him the highest good. Consequently, being a peacemaker is to work for right relations between persons, all persons. The Christian church has a calling which will separate the children of God from people of violence and war, a calling to work for peace and well-being among men.1

One who shares the news of peace the Gospel God plan for peace with Man

Can you name one peacemaker in the world right now? There is no one today who can make peace. Christ alone is the great Peacemaker. He made peace by His blood between a righteous God and an unrighteous sinner. “Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ” (Rom. 5:1).2

Are we like Jesus? Are we sharing Jesus and the Gospel?


VII. The peace-makers are happy, v. 9. The wisdom that is from above is first pure, and then peaceable; the blessed ones are pure toward God, and peaceable toward men; for with reference to both, conscience must be kept void of offence. The peace-makers are those who have, 1. A peaceable disposition: as, to make a lie, is to be given and addicted to lying, so, to make peace, is to have a strong and hearty affection to peace. I am for peace, Ps. 120:7. It is to love, and desire, and delight in peace; to be put in it as in our element, and to study to be quiet. 2. A peaceable conversation; industriously, as far as we can, to preserve the peace that it be not broken, and to recover it when it is broken; to hearken to proposals of peace ourselves, and to be ready to make them to others; where distance is among brethren and neighbours, to do all we can to accommodate it, and to be repairers of the breaches. The making of peace is sometimes a thankless office, and it is the lot of him who parts a fray, to have blows on both sides; yet it is a good office, and we must be forward to it. Some think that this is intended especially as a lesson for ministers, who should do all they can to reconcile those who are at variance, and to promote Christian love among those under their charge.
Now, (1.) Such persons are blessed; for they have the satisfaction of enjoying themselves, by keeping the peace, and of being truly serviceable to others, by disposing them to peace. They are working together with Christ, who came into the world to slay all enmities, and to proclaim peace on earth. (2.) They shall be called the children of God; it will be an evidence to themselves that they are so; God will own them as such, and herein they will resemble him. He is the God of peace; the Son of God is the Prince of peace; the Spirit of adoption is a Spirit of peace. Since God has declared himself reconcilable to us all, he will not own those for his children who are implacable in their enmity to one another; for if the peacemakers are blessed, woe to the peace-breakers! Now by this it appears, that Christ never intended to have his religion propagated by fire and sword, or penal laws, or to acknowledge bigotry, or intemperate zeal, as the mark of his disciples. The children of this world love to fish in troubled waters, but the children of God are the peace-makers, the quiet in the land.3

BIBLE DEFINES WHAT PEACE WITH GOD IS
Therefore, since we have been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. Through him we have also obtained access by faith into this grace in which we stand, and we rejoice in hope of the glory of God. Not only that, but we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope, and hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.
For while we were still weak, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly. For one will scarcely die for a righteous person—though perhaps for a good person one would dare even to die— but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Since, therefore, we have now been justified by his blood, much more shall we be saved by him from the wrath of God. 10 For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, now that we are reconciled, shall we be saved by his life. 11 More than that, we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received reconciliation. 4

    The next description deals with the peacemakers. They are the ones who are themselves at peace with God and live in peace with all men (cf. Rom 5:1). They are called “the” peacemakers for these are not social reformers, but rather the ones reformed by the regenerating power of the gospel. They are peacemakers because they themselves are at peace with God. They have entered into the peace of Christ and thus are able ambassadors of God’s message of peace to a troubled world. Hence, they shall be called the children of God. These only shall be called the sons of God! Throughout the Beatitudes Jesus clearly underscores that only those who have the life-changing qualities herein described are citizens of His kingdom.5

7. Blessed are the peacemakers for they will be called sons of God
The first impact is that of a peacemaker. If there is something our world desperately needs it is peacemakers, but what does this mean? Is this referring to those who sit in the United Nations discussing the trouble spots of the world with a view to putting them right? We may be grateful for the U.N. but I don’t think this, or its equivalent, is what Jesus is referring to. There is no doubt the world is filled with strife, but what is its cause? We are well aware of the symptoms, vividly portrayed on our news bulletins each day, but what is their cause?
Some time ago I was speaking to a High School class of fourteen year olds, and we talked about what they thought was wrong with the world. It did not take long for them to identify the most fundamental problem as being people! I then asked them to suggest what they thought was wrong with people. Various ones gave some instance or other from the news or from personal experience, that they thought typified some of what was wrong. We then tried to reduce each problem to a one word description which I wrote on the blackboard in the front of the room. We ended up with an interesting list that included words like greed, selfishness, pride, jealousy etc. Everyone agreed these words probably described the basic problem with the world.
I then asked them if they thought they had anyone in that class who was greedy, or selfish, or proud or jealous. They were a little taken aback, but quickly began to point to each other and give me some names of who was greedy, who was selfish, etc. etc. I asked them to recognise they had a serious problem here. We had earlier discussed trouble spots in far off distant lands, crime and debauchery reported in the national newspapers and we had all been agreed about those people ‘out there’. I pointed out the problems they had identified in the world were actually right there in the classroom. So I asked them what kind of family they came from, and was there anyone in their family who was proud, greedy, selfish and occasionally jealous. The boys tended to agree their big sisters were like that and the girls tended to agree their little brothers were like that, and most thought their parents could get that way too! I pointed out this was serious—the problem was not just in the world outside, it was not just in their classroom, it was in their own homes. I then singled out one boy, pointed to him and said, ‘Are you ever greedy? Do you ever get jealous? Have you sometimes been a bit selfish?’ He replied incongruously, ‘Me?’ I said, ‘Yes. You’. He said, ‘I don’t know’. The rest of the class joined in unison, ‘Yes, you have’. I thought that might happen, so quickly pointed to another who seemed the most vocal and said, ‘What about you?’. He answered, ‘Well I suppose so’. I said, ‘Don’t say, “I suppose so”. Is it Yes or No?!’ He then said ‘Yes’. I pointed to another, then another, then another and went to almost everyone in the room, asked them the same question and despite some smart answers to begin with they eventually said, ‘Yes’. I said to them, ‘Now we are getting somewhere. What is wrong with the world? You are. I am.’
This is the whole point. James writes, ‘What causes fights and quarrels among you? Don’t they come from your desires that battle within you’ (Jas. 4:1). All the problems we recognise in our world are symptoms of what is going on within us. To be a true peacemaker is not to impose some structure on the symptoms (that has its important place, but the same causes will express themselves in other symptoms again) but to go to the source. The greatest need of every human being cannot be met because of their alienation from God. It is reconciliation with God that brings peace with God (see Rom. 5:1), which in turn leads to experiencing the peace of God (see Phil. 4:7). One of the great privileges of the Christian life is that having come to peace with God ourselves we share the means of peace with those whose deepest need is to know Christ. We become a peacemaker! This concern is an inevitable and unavoidable consequence of the previous six ingredients in the list of beatitudes being in place.
The peacemakers, said Jesus, will be ‘called sons of God’. In bringing others to peace with God we share the ministry of the Son of God. God’s business in his Son is, ‘… to reconcile to himself all things … by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross’ (Col. 1:20). Paul writes of the ministry of Christ, ‘For he himself is our peace … thus making peace … He came and preached peace …’ (Eph. 2:14–17).
When we share the message of, ‘peace through his blood, shed on the cross’, one of two things may happen. There will be those who respond and come to peace, there will be those who react and persecute.6

THE FAMILY BUSINESS IS THE SHARING OF THE LORD TO THE UNSAVED


    5:9 peacemakers. Spiritual peace, not the cessation of physical violence between nations, is in view. Although the term is usually understood to mean those who help others find peace with God, this peace can also be understood as those who have made their own peace with God and are called His children. The principle is extended in vv. 44, 45—the children of God make peace, even with their enemies.7
1 Augsburger, M. S., & Ogilvie, L. J. (1982). Matthew (Vol. 24, p. 18). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Inc.
2 McGee, J. V. (1991). Thru the Bible commentary: The Gospels (Matthew 1-13) (electronic ed., Vol. 34, p. 76). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
3 Henry, M. (1994). Matthew Henry’s commentary on the whole Bible: complete and unabridged in one volume (p. 1630). Peabody: Hendrickson.
4 The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2001). (Ro 5:1–11). Wheaton: Standard Bible Society.
5 Hindson, E. E., & Kroll, W. M. (Eds.). (1994). KJV Bible Commentary (p. 1885). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
6 Price, C. (1998). Matthew: Can Anything Good Come Out of Nazareth? (pp. 71–73). Fearn, Great Britain: Christian Focus Publications.
5:9 peacemakers. Spiritual peace, not the cessation of physical violence between nations, is in view. Although the term is usually understood to mean those who help others find peace with God, this peace can also be understood as those who have made their own peace with God and are called His children. The principle is extended in vv. 44, 45—the children of God make peace, even with their enemies.

7 Sproul, R. C. (Ed.). (2005). The Reformation Study Bible: English Standard Version (p. 1367). Orlando, FL; Lake Mary, FL: Ligonier Ministries.

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

mercy

The first four beatitudes express in one way or another our dependence on God; the next three the outworking of that dependence. This beatitude is relatively straightforward: people who show mercy on others will themselves be the recipients of mercy. The adjective for merciful (found elsewhere in the New Testament only in Heb. 2:17) means those whose bent is to show mercy, not those who engage in an occasional merciful impulse. Such people will receive mercy, a truth we often observe in this life. But Jesus is surely referring basically to an eschatological truth. There are people who show by their habitual merciful deeds that they have responded to God’s love and are living by his grace. They will receive mercy on the last day.1

Mercy is to not give a punishment

Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy. The disciple is a follower of Christ because he has been called and accepted by God. Having thus received mercy, he becomes in turn a channel to convey mercy to others. One who truly understands the freedom of being forgiven will share the same release with others. On the other hand, one who refuses to forgive “breaks down the bridge over which he himself would pass.” James writes, “He shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy” (James 2:13, kjv). Jesus illustrated this in the story of the unforgiving debtor who, having been forgiven ten million dollars, was unwilling to forgive another man a mere twenty dollars! Jesus followed His model prayer by showing a direct relationship between experiencing God’s grace and expressing God’s grace.
The word “mercy” must be seen in its historic and positive meaning. Jesus’ use of the word is based on the Hebrew word chesedh, used frequently in the Old Testament to express the unique quality of the everlasting mercy of Jehovah. The word carries the meaning of identification in the suffering of others, of going through something with another, of entering into another’s problem with understanding and acceptance. And this is what God did for us in Christ; identifying with humanity and suffering on behalf of our sin.2

This beatitude is so misunderstood in our day because it makes our obtaining mercy conditional on our being merciful. This is not the condition on which we obtain mercy—“Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost” (Titus 3:5, italics mine). We should be merciful because we have obtained mercy. “But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvelous light: Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy” (1 Pet. 2:9–10).3

Obtaining mercy—rejecting mercy (vv. 23–24; 5:7). The Pharisees majored on minors. They had rules for every minute area of life, while at the same time they forgot about the important things. It is usually the case that legalists are sticklers for details, but blind to great principles. This crowd thought nothing of condemning an innocent man, yet they were afraid to enter Pilate’s judgment hall lest they be defiled (John 18:28).
There is no question that the Old Testament Law required tithing (Lev. 27:30; Deut. 14:22ff). Abraham had practiced tithing long before the Law was given (Gen. 14:20), and Jacob followed his grandfather’s example (Gen. 28:20–22). The principles of Christian giving under grace are given in 2 Corinthians 8–9. We are not content simply to give a tithe (10 percent), but we also want to bring offerings to the Lord out of hearts filled with love.
Justice, mercy, and faithfulness are the important qualities God is seeking. Obeying the rules is no substitute. While it is good to pay attention to details, we must never lose our sense of priorities in spiritual matters. Jesus did not condemn the practice of tithing. But He did condemn those who allowed their legalistic scruples to keep them from developing true Christian character.4

Those who are merciful … shall obtain mercy has reference to those who have been born again by the mercy of God. Because divine love has been extended to them, they have the work of the Holy Spirit in them producing a mercy which defies explanation by unregenerate men. Jesus Himself became the ultimate example of this when He cried from the cross, “Father, forgive them for they know not what they do” (Lk 23:34). The form of proverbial teaching should not confuse the order of these statements; for example, the believer does not show mercy in order to obtain mercy, he shows mercy because he has obtained mercy. In so continuing to show the evidence of the grace of God in his life he continues to receive that grace. In other words, he is not saved simply because he shows mercy and is kind to people. He shows mercy and is kind because he is saved.5

5:7 Those who are merciful … shall obtain mercy has reference to those who have been born again by the mercy of God. Because divine love has been extended to them, they have the work of the Holy Spirit in them producing a mercy which defies explanation by unregenerate men. Jesus Himself became the ultimate example of this when He cried from the cross, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they do” (Luke 23:34). The form of proverbial teaching should not confuse the order of these statements; for example, the believer does not show mercy in order to obtain mercy, he shows mercy because he has obtained mercy. In so continuing to show the evidence of the grace of God in his life he continues to receive that grace. In other words, he is not saved simply because he shows mercy and is kind to people. He shows mercy and is kind because he is saved.6

5. Blessed are the merciful for they will be shown mercy
One of the expressions of a hunger for righteousness is mercy. This is an interesting statement of Jesus for he does not say, ‘Blessed are those who are shown mercy for they will be merciful’, which we may have expected. Rather it is, ‘Blessed are the merciful …’ those who show mercy, ‘for they will be shown mercy’. There is an important spiritual principle here. God is not pouring his blessing, his mercy and his grace willy-nilly. The condition to receiving from God is giving. We pointed out earlier that the Sermon on the Mount was not addressed to the crowd who listened—it was not an evangelistic sermon—but to the disciples. ‘His disciples came to him and he began to teach them saying …’ (5:2). This principle does not apply to those outside of Christ, teaching that to receive from God they must first give, but it does apply to living the Christian life.
This principle is repeated elsewhere. In the ‘Lord’s prayer’ Jesus says, ‘Forgive us our debts as we have forgiven our debtors …’ (6:12). In other words he is teaching us to pray as a Christian, ‘Forgive me my sins in exactly the same way I forgive other people their sins’. The principle is the same—the condition to receiving from God is giving. In that context Jesus went on to say, ‘If you do not forgive men their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins’ (6:15). This is not a condition to becoming a Christian, but it is a condition for maintaining a wholesome growing relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ, and is in fact a result of our receiving the mercy and forgiveness of the Lord Jesus Christ in the first place. Paul wrote to the Colossians, ‘Bear with each other, and forgive whatever grievances you may have against one another. Forgive as the Lord forgave you’ (Col. 3:13). We forgive as he forgave us, but it is as we forgive he goes on forgiving.
Later still Jesus said, ‘Whoever wants to save his life must lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will save it’ (16:25). This criteria for receiving life is losing it. For now we are concerned only with the principle: the condition to receiving is giving. The extent to which we know the enrichment of God in our lives is the extent to which we allow ourselves to be an enrichment to others.
I remember an elderly man praying to God in a meeting, ‘Thank you we are not called to be like cups but pipes’. He didn’t explain himself, and was perhaps referring to something said earlier which I had missed, but the image struck me forcibly. A cup is something which, when it is full, is full. We like that idea. However a pipe is different. Everything poured in at one end will flow out through the other.
This is the idea Jesus spoke about when he said, ‘ “If anyone is thirsty, let him come to me and drink. Whoever believes in me as the Scripture has said, streams of living water will flow from within him”. By this he meant the Spirit …’ (John 7:37–39). If you are thirsty, said Jesus in effect, do not remain thirsty, come to me and drink. But that is not the end result, ‘streams of living water will flow from within him’. There will be an overflow from your life of that which God has put in you. John adds, ‘By this he meant the Spirit’. This is the work of the Holy Spirit.
Looking after ourselves first has little to do with the Christian life, but we will be looked after when our interests become the interests of other people. If you really want to know the blessing of God in your life, don’t just pray, ‘Lord bless me’ but pray, ‘Lord make me a blessing’, and you will be blessed. If you really want God to teach you something, don’t just pray, ‘Lord teach me something new’, but ‘Lord help me to teach somebody something useful today’, and you will learn. The condition to receiving is giving.
That in turn will lead to the next ingredient in happiness:7


    Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy” (v. 7). This beatitude contains a glorious promise, but there is also something a bit frightening about it. The promise for divine blessing in this case is reserved for the merciful. As we have seen throughout our study of these beatitudes, Jesus is not singling out different groups of people and giving particular rewards to those who manifest particular virtues. Each of us should embrace and manifest all the virtues contained in the beatitudes.
A Spirit of Mercy
The character of the Christian manifests a spirit of mercy. That is not always manifested among Christians, to our great shame. We cannot draw a single breath except by the mercy of God. We are to manifest a spirit of mercy because we ourselves live by it every day and inherit eternal life strictly on the basis of mercy rather than justice. This theme is echoed even in the Lord’s Prayer, which we will examine in more detail later: “Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors” (Matt. 6:12). The frightening aspect of the beatitude is that if God’s forgiveness toward me in anyway reflects my spirit of forgiveness toward others, I am in serious trouble. Since the granting of forgiveness is in some nature a granting of mercy, we who live by mercy should be willing to be merciful to others.
This concept is so important in Jesus’ teaching that we find it later on in Matthew’s Gospel in the parable of the unforgiving servant. A servant was unable to repay a debt he owed, so, when he begged for mercy, his master forgave him. Later, however, the servant refused to forgive a fellow servant who was indebted to him, so the master who had forgiven the first servant’s debt withdrew his mercy and turned that servant over to the jailers. Jesus concludes the parable with these words: “So My heavenly Father also will do to you if each of you, from his heart, does not forgive his brother his trespasses” (Matt. 18:35).
The warning should ring in our ears. If we refuse to extend mercy to those who ask it of us, how can we possibly expect to receive mercy from the hand of God? That is the downside of this blessing. If we stated it in negative terms, the oracle would be one of doom: “Cursed are you who are unmerciful, for you will not receive the mercy of God.” Jesus frames this in a positive way, of course, promising the Father’s blessing on those who are merciful, because if they are, they in turn will receive mercy.
We have already received such mercy from the hand of God that if He were never merciful another time as long as we live, we would have nothing to complain about. The good news is that the mercy we have already received is not the end of the mercy that we shall receive. It shall go on into eternity.

1 Morris, L. (1992). The Gospel according to Matthew (p. 100). Grand Rapids, MI; Leicester, England: W.B. Eerdmans; Inter-Varsity Press.
2 Augsburger, M. S., & Ogilvie, L. J. (1982). Matthew (Vol. 24, p. 18). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Inc.
3 McGee, J. V. (1991). Thru the Bible commentary: The Gospels (Matthew 1-13) (electronic ed., Vol. 34, p. 76). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
4 Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, p. 85). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
5 Hindson, E. E., & Kroll, W. M. (Eds.). (1994). KJV Bible Commentary (p. 1885). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
6 Radmacher, E. D., Allen, R. B., & House, H. W. (1999). Nelson’s new illustrated Bible commentary (Mt 5:7). Nashville: T. Nelson Publishers.
7 Price, C. (1998). Matthew: Can Anything Good Come Out of Nazareth? (pp. 68–70). Fearn, Great Britain: Christian Focus Publications.

GAY IS NOT OK WITH THE BIBLE OR GOD

ust not…”


Portal of the Church of Pilgrims, in Washingto...Gay Theology: Did God Really Say, “You must not…”
by James R. Aist
“But if I were a Christian homosexual, I think this one question would disturb me the most: am I trying to interpret scripture in the light of my proclivity, or should I interpret my proclivity in the light of scripture?” (Morris, 1978)
Introduction
At the heart of the so-called “Gay Theology”, is the claim that the Bible does not condemn homosexual acts that occur within the context of loving, committed, enduring homosexual relationships. This, despite the fact that the Bible does appear to condemn all homosexual acts and that the Christian church has steadfastly held this position since Jesus Christ established His church almost 2,000 years ago. In effect, what gay theology is asking, rhetorically, is, “Did God really say that sex within the context of loving, committed, long-term homosexual relationships is wrong?” If the phrase “Did God really say…” sounds familiar to you, it is probably because that is exactly what Satan said to Eve in the Garden of Eden when he was trying to get her to commit the first sin: “Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?” (Genesis 3:1). And that is exactly what is happening in the Christian church today, in the form of gay theology. Satan is using gay theology to get Christians who are homosexual to continue to practice homosexuality and feel good about it, rather than repent of it. In this article, I will present some of the most important claims of gay theology, point-by-point, and show why each claim should be summarily rejected by all Christians as false doctrine. In doing so, I will draw heavily on Dallas (1991) and Davies & Rentzel (1993).
Refutation of Gay Theology
For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths.” (2 Timothy 4:3-4)
The claims of gay theology can be distilled down to four major points: 1) In Romans 1, Paul could not have been referring to the loving, committed and enduring homosexual relationships that we hear about today, because he knew nothing of such relationships; 2) Paul, in Romans 1, was, instead, referring to temple prostitution resulting from idolatry, homosexual acts committed by a heterosexual person, and/or impersonal sex (i.e., sex without love); 3) Because Jesus did not have anything to say about homosexuality, He must have approved of homosexual acts within the context of loving, committed and enduring homosexual relationships. If He did not approve of them, He would have said so; and 4) Since Jesus emphasized the “law of love”, He must have approved of homosexual acts within the context of loving, committed and enduring homosexual relationships. Now let’s take a look at these four claims in the light of the biblical witness.
Claim # 1: In Romans 1, Paul could not have been referring to the loving, committed and enduring homosexual relationships that we hear about today, because he knew nothing of them. Response # 1: The Apostle Paul (5-64 A.D.) was a well-educated Jew (Acts 22:3) and a citizen of the Roman Empire (Acts 22:27), traveled extensively in Greece and Italy, and would certainly have been aware of loving, lasting, committed same-sex relationships occurring both before and during his lifetime, as the following historical facts would suggest: 1) In the early Roman Imperial period, some male couples were celebrating traditional marriage rites in the presence of friends. Same-sex weddings were reported by sources that mocked them; the feelings of the participants were not recorded. Both Martial and Juvenal referred to marriage between men as something that occurred not infrequently, although they disapproved of it; 2) The Roman Emperor Nero (54 A.D.) celebrated two public weddings with men, once taking the role of the bride (with a freedman Pythagoras), and once the groom (with Sporus); there may have been a third in which he was the bride. These wedding ceremonies included traditional elements such as a dowry and the wearing of the Roman bridal veil; and 3) Same-sex unions were well known in Ancient Greece and Rome. These same-sex unions continued until Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire in the fourth century (Click HERE, HERE and HERE). So, despite Paul’s apparent knowledge of the existence of such homosexual relationships —  loving, lasting, and committed —  he did not endorse them as morally acceptable; rather, he consistently condemned all homo-sexual relations as sinful. Response # 2: For this claim to be true, the Holy Spirit would have had to be either tragically forgetful or grossly incompetent by allowing Paul to omit from his teaching on homosexuality that homosexual acts within the context of loving, committed and enduring homosexual relationships are the exception and, therefore, to be allowed. Secondly, God would have had to let this oversight go uncorrected for 1,900 years, all the while leaving the loving homosexual couples to live in terror of going to hell, unnecessarily. I don’t know what god you believe in, but the God of the Bible is not incompetent, forgetful, or cruel! Response # 3: Jesus promised that, “…the Advocate,the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you.” (John 14:26). In this prophetic promise, “all things” would have included the exception that homosexual acts within the context of loving, committed and enduring homosexual relationships are to be allowed, if God had meant for Jesus to sanction them. Instead, what Paul did was just the opposite: writing after Jesus had returned to the Father, he very specifically and unequivocally condemned all homosexual behavior as sin. This was in keeping with Jesus’ promise that the Holy Spirit “… will remind you of everything I have said to you.”, because Jesus had said, “For out of the heart come evil thoughts—murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. These are what defile a person…” (Matthew 15:19-20), where the Greek word used here for “sexual immorality” (porniea) refers to all sexual sins, including homosexuality and lesbianism. Response # 4: Even if Paul himself had not known about loving, committed and enduring homosexual relationships, God’s Holy Spirit knew about them all along — even to the present day – and yet He did not enlighten and inspire Paul to include an exception for them. So we see that Claim # 1 is nothing more than a fanciful assumption, and one cannot prove a point by appealing to an assumption!
Claim # 2: Paul, in Romans 1, was referring only to temple prostitution resulting from idolatry, homosexual acts committed by a naturally heterosexual person, and/or impersonal sex (i.e., sex without love). Response # 1: If we take a closer look at Paul’s condemnation of homosexual behavior, we find that the Greek word translated “homosexual offenders” (1 Corinthians 6:9) or “perverts” (1 Timothy 1:10) is “arsenokoites”. When this Greek word is broken down into its component parts, its etymology (i.e., derivation) expressed in English is “male-bed-person”, which clearly indicates that, in Paul’s writings, “arsenokoites” refers to “a man who goes to bed with another man to have sex with him”, without reference to the motive, sexual orientation or nature of their relationship. In other words, “arsenokoites” refers to all occasions of homosexual behavior, including loving, committed and enduring homosexual relationships. And this has been the accepted meaning of “arsenokoites” from the time of ancient Greek literature. Furthermore, if there was any exception intended, then Paul, writing under the inspiration and enlightenment of the Holy Spirit, would surely have mentioned it in these passages. But he did not. Response # 2: If we read Romans 1 carefully and critically, and without reading anything into it, we see that Paul refers to homosexual desires and behavior as “vile affections”, “against nature”, and “unseemly” in and of themselves. There is not even a hint that he might have been referring exclusively to temple prostitution, homosexual acts committed by a naturally heterosexual person, and/or impersonal sex (i.e., sex without love). To suggest otherwise is nothing more than an assumption without any scriptural basis in the context of Romans 1. Response # 3: The Apostle Paul was, himself, a highly educated, well-informed and zealous proponent of Judaism (Acts 22:3). It is a documented, historical fact that among the religious Jews there has been, and still is, an unusually low incidence of homosexual behavior, relative to other people groups (Whitehead and Whitehead, 2012). Homosexuality as a component of temple idol worship has long since disappeared from the religious landscape, and yet homosexuality among religious Jews still occurs at an unusually low rate. These facts, taken together, clearly indicate that Judaism has, from its earliest days to the present, considered homosexual behavior to be sinful in and of itself, as a natural reading of the relevant Old Testament passages indicates. And that explains why homosexual behavior was and is taboo across the Jewish culture, and not just as it was manifested in temple idol worship; Judaism has always considered homosexual behavior to be sin. So, when Paul discussed homosexual behavior in the New Testament, he was teaching from his historical, Jewish understanding of the sinful nature of homosexual acts per se, as well as from the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. So we see that Claim # 2 is nothing more than a fanciful assumption, and one cannot prove a point by appealing to an assumption!
Claim # 3: Because Jesus did not have anything to say about homosexuality, He must have approved of homosexual acts within the context of loving, committed and enduring homosexual relationships. If He did not approve of them, He would have said so. Response #1: Wherever the Bible says that the practice of homosexuality is sin, God the Father, God the Son (Jesus) & God the Holy Spirit (the one, triune God) are talking. Therefore, Jesus said everything the Bible says about homosexuality: Genesis 19:5 with Jude 1:7; Leviticus 18:22; Leviticus 20:13; Judges 19:22-25; Romans 1:26-27; I Corinthians 6:9-10; and I Timothy 1:10. While the Bible does not record Jesus singling out homosexual acts per se, as sexual sins, one of His teachings, as recorded by Matthew and Mark, implies that He did consider them to be sin: “For out of the heart come evil thoughts—murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. These are what defile a person…” (Matthew 15:19-20) and “For it is from within, out of a person’s heart, that evil thoughts come—sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from inside and defile a person.” (Mark 7:21-23). The Greek word translated “sexual immorality” in both accounts is “porneia”, which, according to Strong’s Concordance, refers to all forms of illicit sexual intercourse, including adultery, fornication, homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality and incest. It would be presumptuous, at best, to conclude that, out of all the sexual sins that this Greek word refers to, Jesus meant to exclude homosexual acts. If He had meant to exclude homosexual acts from the list, He could have said something like “…sexual immorality (“porneia”), except homosexuality (“arsenokoites”),…”, but He didn’t. The implication, from the context, is that He meant to include homosexual acts among the sins to which He was referring. If this implication is not correct, then Jesus — the man who is also the Divine Son of the all-knowing God — did not say what He meant and therefore mislead His hearers! I would suggest that if you believe that about Jesus, then you may just believe in a “different Jesus” (2 Corinthians 11:4). Response # 2: Paul declared that “the wicked”, including unrepentant “homosexual offenders”, “…will not inherit the kingdom of God…” (I Corinthians 6:9-10), and went on to say that “the wicked” were all washed, sanctified, and justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of God (I Corinthians 6:11). So think about it: if God really made some people homosexual, approved of homosexual behavior, and wanted them to remain gay, then why did He change them in the name (“name”: literally, power and authority) of the Lord Jesus Christ? I think you and I both know why He changed them. And if Jesus approved of homosexual behavior and wanted them to remain gay, how could they have been changed by His own power and authority? Obviously, Jesus also wanted them to be changed. Why? Because the homosexual offenders were wicked (I Corinthians 6:11)! Response # 3: This claim presumes that the recorded words of Jesus are more authoritative than the words of Scripture elsewhere and that Jesus does not agree with what the other writers of the Bible have to say about homosexuality. But it is the Holy Spirit of God who inspired all of the Bible (2 Timothy 3:16), including epistles like Romans, 1 Corinthians, and 1 Timothy, where homosexual behavior is specifically and directly addressed and condemned as sin. And, the role of the Holy Spirit in us is conviction of sin, not denial of sin.  Moreover, Jesus and the Holy Spirit co-exist in the Godhead — in fact, the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of Jesus (Romans 8:9 )  and have been in perfect and eternal communion and harmony all along. Therefore, we can be confident that Jesus agrees with everything the Holy Spirit revealed in the Bible about moral issues, including homosexuality. Response # 4: The Bible does not record all that Jesus did (John 20:30) and it does not claim to have recorded all that He said. An assumption based on the lack of a specific reference to homosexual sins in particular cannot be used to prove a point.  So we see that Claim # 3 is nothing more than a fanciful assumption, and one cannot prove a point by appealing to an assumption!
Claim # 4: Since Jesus emphasized the “law of love”, He must have approved of homosexual acts within the context of loving, committed and enduring homosexual relationships. This claim assumes that the presence of caring and committed love in a relationship sanctifies any and all kinds of lovemaking in that relationship. This is, in fact and unfortunately, the prevailing view in our secular culture. But is this secular view compatible with the biblical view? Response # 1: If this claim is true, then, to be consistent and fair, Jesus would also approve of such sexual sins as fornication, adultery and incest, since all of these relationships can, and often do, involve love, apart from lovemaking. But the Bible condemns all of these other sexual behaviors as sin, despite the presence of love in such relationships. There is no rational basis for claiming that homosexual relationships are the exception. Response # 2: Nowhere in the Bible is it recorded that Jesus even hinted that a motive of love can justify any kind of sinful behavior, including homosexual behavior. Rather, Jesus said that if we love Him, we will obey Him (John 14:23) and that if we do not love Him, we will not obey him (John 14:24). And since Jesus did, in fact, agree with all that the Bible says about homosexuality (see responses to Claim # 3), to obey Him includes abstention from homosexual acts and to not obey Him includes refusing to abstain from homosexual acts. Jesus did not come to save us in our sins, but to save us from our sins. So we see that Claim # 4 is nothing more than a fanciful assumption, and one cannot prove a point by appealing to an assumption!
Perhaps the most powerful argument against the homosexual lifestyle is theological, based on Genesis 1:27,
“So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.” Those who live homosexually blaspheme the image of God, for this is a heterosexual image. “How can male and female have anything to do with the image of God?” you may ask, since God is not a sexual being. Here’s how: God is the creator of human life; that is part of His “image” (i.e., who He is). So, in order for us to be created in that aspect of the “image of God”, He created us male and female, so that we could participate with Him in the creation of human life through heterosexual acts. Homosexual acts cannot
create human life and, therefore, blaspheme the image of God in us.
I would guess that very few Christians are aware that the Bible has stern rebukes and dire warnings for those who approve of sin or encourage others to sin, but it does (Leviticus 19:1; Isaiah 5:20; Malachi 2:17; Matthew 5:19-20; Matthew 18:6; Romans 14:22). Thus, anyone, including born-again Christians, who even approves of or encourages the sins of homosexuality will, someday, have to answer to God for it. If that’s you, then now is the time to repent!
Challenges:
“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.” (Isaiah 5:20)
If you are interested in exploring gay theology and its refutations in more detail, then I recommend that you check out the references and links listed at the end of this post. And, if you are a homosexual Christian who is unwilling to repent of (turn away from) your homosexual behavior, or if you are a heterosexual Christian who approves of or encourages homosexual behavior in any way, I hope that you will be willing to read, carefully and thoughtfully, the following Bible passages and re-think that:
“For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths” (2 Tim. 4:3-4).
“Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a workman who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.” (2 Timothy 2:15)
“Then we will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming.  Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will in all things grow up into him who is the Head, that is, Christ.” (Ephesians 4:14-15)
“We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us.  This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.” (1 John 4:6)
” … find out what pleases the Lord.  Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.  For it is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret.” (Ephesians 5:10-12)
” … offer your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God — this is your spiritual act of worship.  Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind.  Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is — his good, pleasing and perfect will.” (Romans 12:1-2)
“If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples.  Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” (John 8:31-32)
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law and the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.” (Matthew 5:17)
“Do not merely listen to the word, and so deceive yourselves.  Do what it says.” (James 1:22)
“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.” (Matthew 7:21)
“Everyone who confesses the name of the Lord must turn away from wickedness.” (2 Timothy 2:19)
” … the wicked will not stand in the judgment, nor sinners in the assembly of the righteous.” (Psalm 1:5)
“He who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning.  The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the Devil’s work.  No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God’s seed remains in him; he cannot go on sinning, because he has been born of God.  This is how we know who the children of God are and who the children of the Devil are:  Anyone who does not do what is right is not a child of God; nor is anyone who does not love his brother.” (1 John 3:10)
“There is a way that seems right to a man, but in the end it leads to death.” (Proverbs 14:12)
“I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book:  If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book. And if anyone takes words away from this book of prophecy, God will take away from him his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book.” (Revelation 22:19)
“Those whom I love I rebuke and discipline.  So be earnest, and repent.” (Revelation 3:19)
Do It Yourself
Here’s how to do a study of the Hebrew and Greek root words used in the Bible to express God’s views on homosexuality, without being a Hebrew or Greek scholar yourself: 1) find online and open “Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance” at “Bible Study Tools” (click HERE); 2) follow the instructions given in the introductory pane; 3) check the “Strong’s Numbers” box at the top right of your reading pane to view the Hebrew and Greek lexicons using Strong’s Concordance numbers; 4) enter, in turn, the following Bible verses — Genesis 19:5 with Jude 1:7; Leviticus 18:22; Leviticus 20:13; Romans 1:26-27; I Corinthians 6:9-10; and I Timothy 1:10 — and click on the respective highlighted words (hyperlinks) to access the appropriate lexicon and read the meaning of the Hebrew or Greek words given in English. You can toggle between the King James Version (KJV) and the New American Standard (NAS) version. You will find, as expected, that wherever homosexual behavior is mentioned, it is consistently condemned as sin, abomination, per-version, etc. And understand that later English versions of the Bible, such as the NIV and NAS, consulted the ancient Hebrew and Greek manuscripts, rather than relying on the KJV. The claim of gay activists, that the Bible does not condemn homosexual behavior, is nothing but pure fantasy and wishful thinking, as you can see for yourself.
(For more articles on HOMOSEXUALITY, click HERE)
References Cited:
Whitehead, N. and B. Whitehead. 2012. What do different cultures tell us about homosexuality? (click HERE)
Dallas, J. 1991. Desires in Conflict. Harvest House Publishers, Eugene, OR. pp. 267-282.
Davies, B. & L. Rentzel. 1993. Coming Out of Homosexuality. InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL. pp. 183-189.
Morris, P.D. 1978. Shadow of Sodom. Facing the Facts of Homosexuality. Tyndall House. 164 pp.
Recommended Links for further study:

Thursday, July 30, 2015

seek Jesus for hunger

Next Jesus turns to people’s attitude to uprightness. Matthew uses the verb “to hunger” 9 times, but in all the other 8 it refers to literal hunger while here the meaning is clearly metaphorical (as it is twice in Luke and once in John). With it is linked thirst, which is more often used in the metaphorical sense (cf. Ps. 42:2). Jesus is speaking of an intense longing after righteousness that may be likened to both hunger and thirst. Everyone now and then does what is right, but Jesus is pointing his hearers not to occasional acts but to a passionate concern for the right. Righteousness is often used in the New Testament for the right standing believers have before God because of Christ’s atoning work, but this is often said to be a Pauline concept rather than one that Matthew sets forth. Now it is plain that Matthew has a strong interest in the upright living that should characterize the servant of Christ, and we must not try to turn him into a pale shadow of Paul. But we must not minimize his emphasis on grace either (cf. v. 3). Specifically we should notice that he is not suggesting that people can make a strong effort and achieve the righteousness of which he is writing: it is a given righteousness, not an achieved righteousness. The blessed do not achieve it but hunger and thirst for it. They will be filled, which surely means that God will fill them (cf. 6:33, “his righteousness”). We need not doubt that the term here includes the doing of right, an indication that we are expected to live in full accordance with the will of God. How could anyone have a strong desire for a right standing before God without at the same time strongly wanting to do the right? Today there is a strong emphasis on social righteousness, the liberation of people from oppression, and that can scarcely be out of mind either. Righteousness is a rich and full concept, but whichever way we understand it, it is a righteousness that people cannot produce of themselves. We are to do our best and we may be able to avoid “the gutters of life,” but this righteousness is a gift of God. And of those who have this wholehearted longing for the right Jesus says, they will be filled.26 They do not achieve it of themselves, but God fulfils their longing. God will not disappoint anyone who has this deep desire to do his will. Those who long for righteousness will have a full measure, not a mere trace. There are two thoughts here, the first of which insists on the disposition of the seeker. The good gift of God does not come indiscriminately to all the race, but only to those who seek it wholeheartedly. The second is that, for all their intense longing, the seekers do not fill themselves with righteousness, but are filled; righteousness is a gift of God.1

the righteousness of God is a gift when one is saved.

What about the natural man; does he hunger and thirst for righteousness? The ones I meet do not! “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned” (1 Cor. 2:14). The “natural man” is in contrast to the spiritual man who has found that Christ is his righteousness—“… of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption” (1 Cor. 1:30).2

. “Blind guides” is a perfect description, one that must have brought a smile to the lips of the listeners. Jesus had used it before (Matt. 15:14). The Pharisees were blind to the true values of life. Their priorities were confused. They would take an oath and use some sacred object to substantiate that oath—the gold in the temple, for example, or the gift on the altar. But they would not swear by the temple itself or the altar. It was the temple that sanctified the gold and the altar that sanctified the gift. They were leaving God out of their priorities.
Jesus knew that the Pharisees wanted both the gold and the gifts on the altar. This is why the Pharisees practiced “Corban”—anything dedicated to God could not be used for others (Matt. 15:1–9; Mark 7:10–13). These men were not seeking for the righteousness of God; they were greedy for gain. They worked out a “religious system” that permitted them to rob God and others and still maintain their reputations.3

These future possessors of the earth are its presently-installed rightful heirs and even now they hunger and thirst after righteousness. They experience a deep desire for personal righteousness which is, in itself, a proof of their spiritual re-birth. Those who are poor and empty in their own spiritual poverty recognize the depth of their need and hunger and thirst for that which only God can give them. To hunger means to be needy. It is joined with to thirst; the born-again man has a God-given hunger and thirst (inner passion) for righteousness. This hungering and thirsting continues throughout the life of the believer. He continues to hunger and to be filled and to hunger and to be filled. God supplies his every spiritual need daily. This act of hungering and thirsting after righteousness is the by-product of a regenerated life.
Lawlor (p. 60) rightly states that this is the description of a man who has already been saved. Nowhere does the Bible command unbelievers to hunger after righteousness in order to be saved. Rather, Paul clearly states “there is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God” (Rom 3:11). The biblical writers make it clear that while man must come to Christ for salvation, it is not within man’s normal ability and desire to want to come to God. Therefore, God is depicted throughout the New Testament as the seeking Saviour going after the lost. They shall be filled (Gr chortazō) refers to a complete filling and satisfaction. The psalmist proclaimed: “He satisfieth the longing soul, and filleth the hungry soul with goodness” (107:9). This filling comes from God, who is the total source of satisfaction of His people. It comes now and it will continue to come throughout eternity to those who hunger and thirst for it.4

Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be filled” (v. 6). Commentators say that what Jesus had in mind here are those believers who passionately search for the imputation of the righteousness of Christ by which we receive our standing before God. We do not have enough righteousness of our own to get us into heaven, they say. Only those who are clothed with the righteousness of Christ will ever enter into His kingdom. Certainly that is true, but I doubt that is what Jesus had in mind here, because even though we are justified by faith and not by our works, we are justified unto works. We have been elected by God and received His grace unto righteousness. Even though our righteousness will never justify us, the fruit of our justification is growth in real righteousness. As Martin Luther said, we were dead in our sins, but God raised us from the dead, and He declared us well while we were still in sin. That is what justification by faith means. Not only did He give us that declaration, but He gave us the medicine by which we actually do become conformed to the image of Jesus, and every Christian is called to grow up into maturity and righteousness.
Elsewhere in this Gospel we are going to see this quest for righteousness, but we have an allergy to it because we tend to link righteousness with self-righteousness, that which the Pharisees displayed, rather than with real righteousness. Real righteousness is, simply, doing what is right. That should be a concern for us, and not just a passing concern. The images used here are those of hunger and thirst. This message was given to people who, for the most part, lived in the desert, who knew what it meant to have such a parched palate that their thirst was so consuming that just one cup of cold water would dramatically improve their condition. They also knew what it meant to endure starvation, to go hungry for long periods of time. For someone who is in that state of hunger, like one who crosses the desert and runs out of water and prays every second for the appearance of an oasis, the pursuit of that oasis is the only thing that keeps him going. The intensity of that sort of thirst and hunger is what Jesus says should mark our lives.
As a young man Jonathan Edwards wrote down resolutions for the virtues that he sought to achieve in his life, and by the grace of God he became a model of righteousness. At almost the same time there was another man in colonial America who also sought after righteousness without the aid of God. His name was Benjamin Franklin. Franklin made a list of the virtues that he wanted to manifest. Each day he would examine himself as to whether he had accomplished a particular righteousness during the preceding twenty-four hours. He confessed that, after noting for a number of consecutive days his success with humility, that he was becoming proud of his humility. Even the unregenerate understand at certain points their failure to achieve real righteousness.
That would be a wonderful thing to have on our tombstone, that we were righteous. We ought not to despise righteousness as something that belongs only to the self-righteous; rather, we should love righteousness enough to pursue it intensely as those who hunger and thirst, because God promises that if we hunger for righteousness, we will not be sent away empty. We will receive the bread of life that will feed us for eternity. If we thirst for righteousness, the Son of righteousness will come with living water that will well up in our souls to eternal life. We will be filled. We will be satisfied from these pursuits.5

So again, the blessedness pronounced on them who hunger and thirst after righteousness. It were a weakness of judgment indeed, to suppose, that the righteousness such souls most earnestly desire, is the righteousness of mere moral honesty and justice between man and man in life. These things the laws among men enforce, and the Scribes and Pharisees of our Lord’s days, prided themselves upon them. Surely no one who reads his Bible can for a moment, if he thinks rightly, suppose that the Son of God came upon earth to preach what even unenlightened heathens had always insisted upon. This would be indeed to run back to the law of Moses, instead of preaching the Gospel of Christ. But the righteousness the Son of God had in view, when declaring these souls blessed which hungered and thirsted for it, was his own complete righteousness, which alone can justify a poor sinner in the sight of God. So that in the hungering for it, the soul gave evident proofs that he had no righteousness of his own to appear in before God, and therefore earnestly longed to be cloathed with Christ’s robe of righteousness, and garment of salvation. And graciously the Lord Jesus here declares all such shall not hunger in vain. He who excites the hunger in the soul, is He who also satisfieth it. And hence the promises and the performance. Psalm 132:9–16. Isaiah 61:1, 2, 3, 10, 11.6

5:6 hunger and thirst for righteousness. This is the opposite of the self-righteousness of the Pharisees. It speaks of those who seek God’s righteousness rather than attempting to establish a righteousness of their own (Ro 10:3; Php 3:9). What they seek will fill them, i.e., it will satisfy their hunger and thirst for a right relationship with God.7
For thew Gospel to have Jesus in the heart and to love him fully

5:6 Those who hunger and thirst for righteousness recognize that God is the ultimate source of real righteousness, so they long for his righteous character to be evident in people’s lives on earth. They shall be satisfied by responding to his invitation to be in relationship with him.8
1 Morris, L. (1992). The Gospel according to Matthew (pp. 98–100). Grand Rapids, MI; Leicester, England: W.B. Eerdmans; Inter-Varsity Press.
2 McGee, J. V. (1991). Thru the Bible commentary: The Gospels (Matthew 1-13) (electronic ed., Vol. 34, pp. 75–76). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
3 Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, pp. 84–85). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
4 Hindson, E. E., & Kroll, W. M. (Eds.). (1994). KJV Bible Commentary (pp. 1884–1885). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
5 Sproul, R. C. (2013). Matthew (pp. 82–83). Wheaton, IL: Crossway.
6 Hawker, R. (2013). Poor Man’s New Testament Commentary: Matthew–John (Vol. 1, p. 36). Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.
7 MacArthur, J. F., Jr. (2006). The MacArthur study Bible: New American Standard Bible. (Mt 5:6). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers.
8 Crossway Bibles. (2008). The ESV Study Bible (p. 1828). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.