Monday, January 22, 2018

Judgment of the Nations
(25:31–46)
But when the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, then He will sit on His glorious throne. And all the nations will be gathered before Him; and He will separate them from one another, as the shepherd separates the sheep from the goats; and He will put the sheep on His right, and the goats on the left. Then the King will say to those on His right, “Come, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in; naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me.” Then the righteous will answer Him, saying, “Lord, when did we see You hungry, and feed You, or thirsty, and give You drink? And when did we see You a stranger, and invite You in, or naked, and clothe You? And when did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?” And the King will answer and say to them, “Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.” Then He will also say to those on His left, “Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels; for I was hungry, and you gave Me nothing to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me nothing to drink; I was a stranger, and you did not invite Me in; naked, and you did not clothe Me; sick, and in prison, and you did not visit Me.” Then they themselves also will answer, saying, “Lord, when did we see You hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not take care of You?” Then He will answer them, saying, “Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.” And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life. (25:31–46)
The Bible makes clear that all sin is known to God and that all sin must be punished. Moses declared, “Be sure your sin will find you out” (Num. 32:23), and the writer of Proverbs testified that “adversity pursues sinners” (Prov. 13:21). Moses also wrote, “Thou hast placed our iniquities before Thee, our secret sins in the light of Thy presence” (Ps. 90:8). In other words, what may appear to us to be secret is actually in the full, clear view of God. No sin escapes God’s notice or God’s judgment. The consequence of sin is like a shadow that cannot be shaken, and what the wicked “deserves will be done to him” (Isa. 3:11). Judgment for sin is inevitable.
Paul sums up that basic truth in his letter to the Romans: “The wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men” (1:18, emphasis added). Later in that same letter the apostle wrote, “There will be tribulation and distress for every soul of man who does evil” (2:9, emphasis added). No sin and no sinner is exempted from God’s judgment and punishment.
Not even the sins of Christians are exempt. The marvelous and gracious privilege granted to Christians, however, is to have had the judgment and punishment for all their sins placed upon the Lord Jesus Christ, who died as the substitute for sinners. By God’s divine grace working through their obedient trust in His Son, believers have the guilt and penalty for their sins nailed to the cross with Christ, who made atonement sufficient even for the sins of the whole world.
But those who do not receive Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior must bear the penalty for their own sins, which is spiritual death and eternal damnation. The warning to unbelievers is stated over and over again in Scripture by word and demonstrated by direct acts of divine judgment. When Adam committed the first sin, there was judgment of massive proportions, confirming for all time the seriousness with which God views evil. That sin committed by one man not only devastated the human race but the entire created universe with it. During the time of Noah, iniquity had become so widespread and vile that God destroyed all mankind except for the eight righteous souls in Noah’s immediate family. Sodom and Gomorrah became so utterly wicked that God destroyed those cities simultaneously with fire and brimstone (Gen. 19:24–25). Throughout history God has chosen sovereignly to judge certain nations, cities (see Matt. 11:21–24), and individuals, and those judgments stand as divine signposts to mankind, warning that no person or group of people, no matter how powerful by human standards, can sin with impunity (cf. 1 Cor. 10:6–12).
God’s judgment is a repeated theme both in the Old and New Testaments. The judgment emphasized in the Old Testament is primarily temporal, whereas that in the New Testament is primarily eternal. With significant exceptions, the Old focuses on punishment suffered in this world and the New on punishment suffered in the next. The Old more often speaks about God’s physically destroying nations, punishing cities, or afflicting individuals because of their wickedness. The New, on the other hand, more often speaks of judgment that lasts through all eternity.
No one in Scripture spoke more of judgment than Jesus. He spoke of sin that could not be forgiven, of the danger of losing one’s soul forever, of spending eternity in the torments of hell, of existing forever in outer darkness, where there will be perpetual weeping and gnashing of teeth. No pictures of judgment are more intense and sobering than those Jesus portrayed.
Yet nothing Jesus said or did was inconsistent with His gracious love. He wept at the impending punishment coming on Jerusalem’s people (Luke 19:41–44). His warnings of judgment and punishment were acts of love, divine appeals for men to turn from their sin in order to escape the condemnation that would otherwise be inevitable. One of love’s supreme desires is to protect those it loves from harm, and Jesus therefore spoke so much of judgment because, in His infinite love and grace, it was not His wish nor the Father’s “for any to perish but for all to come to repentance” (2 Pet. 3:9). What more important and loving warning could there be than warning about the eternal damnation every human being faces apart from Jesus Christ? Jesus sought to draw men to Himself not only through the attractiveness of salvation but through the horrors of its only alternative.
Jesus’ closing words in the Olivet discourse-a sermon on His second coming given privately to the disciples after His last public teaching in the Temple—were one of the most severe and sobering warnings of judgment in all of Scripture. Pictured as the divine separation of the righteous sheep from the unrighteous goats, that judgment will occur just before Christ establishes His millennial kingdom on earth. Not only will it determine the ultimate, eternal destinies of everyone living at the end of the Tribulation but will also determine who will and will not enter the kingdom. Only those who belong to the King, believers who have been born into God’s spiritual family and been made citizens of His spiritual kingdom, will enter His glorious kingdom.
The judgment of the sheep and goats is not mentioned in any of the other gospels, no doubt because they do not focus on Christ’s kingship, as does Matthew. For that same reason Matthew places much greater emphasis on all aspects of the Lord’s second coming than do the other gospels, because it is at His return that He will manifest Himself as King of kings and Lord of lords in consummate regal glory and power (Rev. 19:11–16).
The Setting of Judgment
But when the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, then He will sit on His glorious throne. And all the nations will be gathered before Him; (25:31–32a)
the judge
But when the Son of Man (25:31a)
The sovereign Judge over the separation of the sheep and goats will be Christ Himself, the Son of Man. Jesus had earlier declared that “not even the Father judges anyone, but He has given all judgment to the Son, in order that all may honor the Son, even as they honor the Father” (John 5:22). God the Father has delegated all judgment authority to the Son, the Lord Jesus Christ.
The most common title Jesus used of Himself was the Son of Man. That title affirmed His incarnation, His identity with mankind, His time of humiliation and sacrifice. It reflected His condescension, His submissiveness, His humility, His meekness, and His gracious love for fallen humanity.
That title also tended to be less offensive than “Son of God.” To have referred regularly to Himself as the Son of God would have aroused additional and needless hostility from the Jewish religious leaders, and they would have given even less heed to His teaching than they did.
In a similar way, to have referred regularly to Himself as King would have aroused the hostility and opposition of the Roman authorities, who were quick to suppress any hint of insurrection.
In addition to those reasons, for Jesus regularly to have used any such exalted title of Himself would have tempted His followers to be presumptuous and arrogant, missing His message of spiritual salvation. It would have greatly increased their already staunch conviction that, as Messiah, He would soon overthrow the Roman yoke and establish His earthly kingdom on the throne of David.
In addition to those reasons, His referring to Himself as Son of Man provided a profound contrast with the titles and roles He will have when He comes in glory. It suggested a clear distinction between His two comings.
On the other hand, His referring to Himself both as Son of Man and as heavenly King (vv. 34, 40) reinforced the truth that He is indeed both. The condescending, humble, and humiliated Son of Man will return one day as the glorious, sovereign, reigning, and judging King of kings and Lord of lords.
Until this point in His ministry Jesus had never directly referred to Himself as King. He had told a parable about a king who represented God the Father (Matt. 22:1–14); but not until now, talking privately to the Twelve (24:3), did He speak of Himself as King. Even when Pilate asked, “Are You the King of the Jews?” Jesus replied simply, “It is as you say” (Matt. 27:11). But Pilate did not take that claim seriously, at least not in a political sense, as evidenced by the fact that he offered the Jews an opportunity to secure Jesus’ release, knowing “that because of envy they had delivered Him up” (vv. 17–18).
For a long while the Jewish people, and certainly their religious leaders, knew that Jesus claimed to be a kind of king, because He claimed to be Messiah (see Luke 23:2). It was because they hoped that, as Messiah, He would conquer Rome and reign over a delivered Israel that they had acclaimed Him during the triumphal entry. There was no misunderstanding among Jews that Jesus claimed to be Messiah, the coming great King. Nor could there be any misunderstanding that He claimed to be God’s own Son. But publicly, Jesus nevertheless was always judicious in the way He made such claims. He did not want to needlessly incite the ire of His enemies.
Now, however, in privacy with His disciples on the Mount of Olives, He unambiguously declared that He, the Son of Man, would one day take His rightful place as the great King and Judge. The point of this account is that, sitting “on His glorious throne” (v. 31), He will reign over the earth and that His first act as sovereign Lord will be to decide who enters His millennial, earthly kingdom and who does not. And because His kingdom will encompass the entire earth, it is obvious that those who are not allowed to enter will not remain on earth. As Jesus explicitly states, “these will go away into eternal punishment” (v. 46).
The certainty of God’s ultimate judgment of the wicked was prophesied even by “Enoch, in the seventh generation from Adam.” Through divine revelation, that ancient man of God declared, “Behold, the Lord came with many thousands of His holy ones, to execute judgment upon all, and to convict all the ungodly of all their ungodly deeds which they have done in an ungodly way, and of all the harsh things which ungodly sinners have spoken against Him” (Jude 14–15).
In light of the utter and perfect holiness of the Almighty and the persistent sinfulness and ungodliness of man that Enoch pointed out, it is not the Lord’s coming in wrath to render judgment that is amazing but rather His first coming in grace to offer salvation. The wonder is not that Jesus will some day come in glory to judge the world but that He first came in humility to save sinners. The marvel is not that God promises to condemn sinners for their sin but that He first offers them deliverance from it. In coming to save those who trust in Him, the Lord Jesus Christ demonstrated His great love for the unlovely by bearing the penalty of their sin, dying the death they deserve. What is remarkable is that He came to redeem sinners who are worthy only of His judgment.
The Time
comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, (25:31b)
The time of judgment will be Christ’s return, when He comes in His glory. Although we do not know at what precise time in history that event will occur (Matt. 24:36, 42, 44, 50), we know that He will appear “immediately after the tribulation” (24:29).
Apparently His judgment will be instantaneous, at the moment He appears, and when that occurs the opportunity for faith in Him will be past. As pictured in the parable of the virgins, when the Bridegroom comes the door will be shut (Matt. 25:10). When the Lord comes to earth in glory with His angels and saints, there will be no opportunity for unbelievers then living to receive Him as Messiah.
The full Tribulation will last seven years, and the second half of it, the Great Tribulation, will last three and a half years, or 1260 days (Dan. 7:25; 9:27; 12:7; Rev. 11:2–3; 12:14; 13:5). Daniel also spoke of an expanded period of 1290 days (Dan. 12:11), 30 days more than the basic 1260 of the Great Tribulation, and then of a 1335-day period (Dan. 12:12), adding another 45 days to make a total addition of 75. As suggested in chapter 3 of this volume, it seems that the best explanation for those additional days is that they will cover the time when the Messiah descends to the Mount of Olives, creates the great valley in which the nations of the world will be judged, and then executes that judgment (see Zech. 14:4–5). But whatever transpires during those additional days, there will be no further opportunity for people to receive and confess Jesus Christ as their Lord.
Accompanying and assisting the Lord at His appearing in glory and judgment will be the magnificent host of all His heavenly angels. At that time, Paul says, “the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with His mighty angels in flaming fire, dealing out retribution to those who do not know God and to those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus” (2 Thess. 1:7–8).
When He appears, “immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from the sky, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken, and then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in the sky, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of the sky with power and great glory. And He will send forth His angels” (Matt. 24:29–31).
The Lord will come not only with His angels but with His saints. “When Christ, who is our life, is revealed,” Paul assured the Colossian believers, “then you also will be revealed with Him in glory” (Col. 3:4). The Old Testament saints, the saints of the church who will have died, the saints who will have been raptured, and the saints who will have been martyred during the Tribulation will all accompany Christ and join the saints still living on earth when He descends to earth to establish His millennial kingdom.
the place
then He will sit on His glorious throne. (25:31c)
The place of Christ’s judgment will be the earth, where He will sit on His glorious throne. Then “there will be no end to the increase of His government or of peace, on the throne of David and over his kingdom, to establish it and to uphold it with justice and righteousness from then on and forevermore” (Isa. 9:7). Christ will first reign over the restored earth for a thousand years and then over the newly created heavens and earth throughout all eternity.
While Mary was still only betrothed to Joseph, the angel told her, “Behold, you will conceive in your womb, and bear a son, and you shall name Him Jesus. He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David; and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever; and His kingdom will have no end” (Luke 1:31–33).
David’s throne was in Jerusalem, and that is therefore where Christ’s throne will be. When Jesus returns, “His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, which is in front of Jerusalem on the east; and the Mount of Olives will be split in its middle from east to west by a very large valley, so that half of the mountain will move toward the north and the other half toward the south” (Zech. 14:4). From that passage it becomes obvious that the Jerusalem then in existence will be cataclysmically transformed to be made suitable as the place of Christ’s divine, glorious throne.
When the Lord returns, “the nations [will] be aroused and come up to the valley of Jehoshaphat,” where He will declare, “Put in the sickle, for the harvest is ripe. Come, tread, for the wine press is full; the vats overflow, for their wickedness is great. Multitudes, multitudes in the valley of decision! For the day of the Lord is near in the valley of decision” (Joel 3:12–14). But the decisions in that day will not be made by men but by God. The time for deciding to receive Christ will be past, and the decisions people already will have made regarding Him will determine His decision regarding them. Those for whom He is Lord and Savior will enter the kingdom, and those who have rejected Him will be forever excluded. At that time the Lord will roar “from Zion and [will utter] His voice from Jerusalem, and the heavens and the earth [will] tremble. But the Lord is a refuge for His people and a stronghold to the sons of Israel. Then you will know that I am the Lord your God, dwelling in Zion My holy mountain. So Jerusalem will be holy, and strangers will pass through it no more” (Joel 3:16–17).
At the ascension, an angel made clear that Jesus’ return would be bodily and historical, not figurative or merely spiritual. He told the astonished disciples, “This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven” (Acts 1:11). When He returns to earth He will reign personally on a literal throne, in a literal Jerusalem, and over a literal people.
The Subjects
And all the nations will be gathered before Him; (25:32a)
The subjects of Christ’s judgment will be all the nations. Ethna (nations) has the basic meaning of peoples and here refers to every person alive on earth when the Lord returns. Although He will have taken all believers into heaven at the Rapture, during the following seven years of the Tribulation many other people will come to believe in Him. During that dreadful time, multitudes of Gentiles (see Rev. 7:9, 14), as well as all surviving Jews (Rom. 11:26), will be brought to faith in Christ.
As Jesus makes clear later in this passage, those who are alive on earth when He returns will include both saved and unsaved, represented by the sheep and the goats, respectively. And those two separate peoples will have two separate destinies. The believers will be ushered into the kingdom and the unbelievers into eternal punishment (Matt. 25:46).
Just as death immediately crystallizes eternity for unbelievers when they die, so will the second coming of Christ crystallize eternity for unbelievers who are then alive. They will be destroyed on the spot and ushered instantaneously into judgment and eternal punishment.
But believers who are alive at the Lord’s coming in glory will go directly into the earthly kingdom in their earthly bodies. There is no indication in Scripture that those saints will experience any sort of transformation at that time. But mingling with them and ruling over them will be the glorified saints of all ages who will then be reigning with Christ (Rev. 20:4). Although their bodies will be of vastly different orders, those two groups of saints will be able to communicate and interact with each other just as Jesus communicated and interacted with the disciples in His glorified body after the resurrection.
Amillennialists do not believe Christ will reign in a literal, thousand-year kingdom on earth. They consider the Millennium to be a figurative, spiritualized picture of Christ’s reigning on earth through the hearts of His redeemed people. But what would be the purpose of God’s giving His saints glorified bodies capable of living on the physical earth if they would never have opportunity to live there? The resurrected Christ was the perfect illustration of millennial kingdom living by glorified saints, because before His ascension He demonstrated His ability to live on this earth in the same glorified body in which He would forever occupy heaven.
There will be reproduction during the kingdom, but apparently all the children born to the redeemed people who enter it will not become redeemed themselves-any more than children born to redeemed parents in any age necessarily become redeemed themselves. At the end of the millennial kingdom there appear to be many unbelievers, who will participate in Satan’s final rebellion against God (Rev. 20:7–9). Obviously, those rebels will be descendants of the saints who went directly into the kingdom at Christ’s return. We should not be surprised that there are those who will not believe in Christ even though He will be in their presence. Most of His hearers did not believe the first time He came, either.
That final rebellion against the glorified Christ and His kingdom of perfect love, wisdom, justice, and righteousness gives final and irrefutable testimony to man’s natural depravity. Although their environment will be perfect in every respect and Satan will be bound and unable to tempt or in any other way influence men, some people will nevertheless reject Christ even during the Millennium. The only possible source of their sin and rebellion will be their own corrupt hearts (cf. Jer. 17:9).
Contrary to what some Bible teachers and theologians claim, the idea of a literal, physical, earthly Millennium did not originate in modern times. As the astute German theologian Erich Sauer has well documented, belief in such a literal thousand-year, earthly kingdom was the common and orthodox view of the early church, from New Testament times through the middle of the third century (see his The Triumph of the Crucified [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1951]). Early church Fathers such as Papias, Justin, Tertullian, and Hippolytus all affirmed a literal and earthly future kingdom ruled directly by Christ. It was only later, as allegorical hermeneutics became fashionable, that literal millennialism was rejected in favor of a spiritualized interpretation (p. 144).
Those who reject a literal Millennium must do one or more of three things. The first is to confuse Israel and the church, taking the church to be a spiritualized form of the ancient nation of Israel. In that case, the Old Testament curses were for literal Israel, being already fulfilled, and the promises of blessing to Israel would be fulfilled in the church, but in a spiritual, not literal, way. That kind of divided, inconsistent hermeneutics in unacceptable. The second is to make present or past what is clearly future, assuming that all the promises to the literal nation and people of Israel have already been fulfilled, making the earthly kingdom unnecessary. The third is to arbitrarily spiritualize certain Old Testament prophecies, taking predicted places, events, or persons as being merely symbols of spiritual ideas or truths instead of physical and historical realities.
In the book just mentioned above (pp. 144–53), Erich Sauer suggests five compelling arguments for a literal and historical future kingdom. First of all, such a kingdom would be the only adequate confirmation of the truthfulness and reliability of God’s promises. Isaiah predicted that the Messiah would establish an everlasting kingdom on the throne of David (Isa. 9:6–7). Paul declared that “the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable,” referring specifically to His promises to ancient Israel (Rom. 11:29). But if those promises were merely figurative, their fulfillments could never be verified and would be meaningless. In particular, the prophecies about the Messiah would have no clear meaning and could never be verified. But Isaiah himself declared that the Lord’s promises are more unshakable than the mountains (Isa. 54:10) and Israel’s endurance as a nation will be as permanent as the new heavens and the new earth that the Lord will one day create (66:22). Jeremiah affirmed that God’s covenant promises are more secure than the pattern of night following day (Jer. 33:20) and more stable than the courses of the sun, moon, and stars (31:35–36).
Second, an earthly millennial kingdom is the only explanation of the end times that corresponds to Jesus’ teaching in the gospels. For example, His promise to the apostles that one day they would “sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel” (Matt. 19:28) would be meaningless apart from a literal, historical restoration of Israel.
Third, an earthly millennial kingdom is the only consistent interpretation of Messianic prophecy. It is obvious from the gospel records that a great many of those prophecies were literally fulfilled during Jesus’ lifetime. He was born in Bethlehem, just as Micah predicted (5:2). He rode into Jerusalem on a donkey, was betrayed for thirty pieces of silver, and was pierced in the side, just as Zechariah predicted (9:9; 11:12; 12:10). His hands and feet were literally pierced, precisely as the psalmist predicted (22:16; cf. 16:10), and He literally died, was buried, and was resurrected, just as Isaiah predicted (53:8–12).
Those fulfillments were so obviously literal that no one suggests the predictions of them were merely symbolic of spiritual truths. Yet many other equally specific and detailed predictions about the Messiah, such as His establishing an eternal throne over the kingdom of David, were just as obviously not fulfilled during Jesus’ earthly ministry. Therefore, to reject the idea of a literal Millennium is to maintain that some of the Old Testament prophecies were literal and some were not. And to take that position is to assume arbitrarily that all prophecies not literally fulfilled by New Testament times are to be spiritualized.
At the time they were written, all Old Testament predictions obviously pertained to the future. By what logic or authority, then, does one take some of their fulfillments to be literal and others to be only figurative?
Fourth, an earthly, visible kingdom is the best possible way for Jesus Christ to demonstrate that He is the supreme ruler over His creation. How else could He prove Himself to be King of kings and Lord of lords? How could He verify that His rulership is superior to that of all other monarchs if He had no opportunity to rule an earthly kingdom? How better could He prove Himself to be the supremely just King than by personally meting out justice to His subjects? How better could He prove Himself to be the infinitely merciful Lord than by personally showing mercy on His subjects? To do those things He would have to have an earthly kingdom, because in heaven there is no need either for justice or for mercy.
Could it be that, besides the brief time between the creation of Adam and the Fall, the world will know no dominion but Satan’s? Could it be that God will literally destroy but not literally restore this vast creation, all of which longs to “be set free from its slavery to corruption into the freedom of the glory of the children of God” and in that longing “groans and suffers the pains of childbirth” (Rom. 8:21–22)?
The perfect millennial kingdom will testify through all eternity that Jesus Christ is the supreme sovereign, who alone can bring absolute harmony and peace to a world even while it is still infected by sin.
Fifth, an earthly millennial kingdom is the only and necessary bridge from human history to eternal glory. Paul declares that in the end Christ will deliver “up the kingdom to the God and Father, when He has abolished all rule and all authority and power” and that “He must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet” (1 Cor. 15:24–25, emphasis added). What other kingdom could Christ deliver to His Father but an earthly kingdom? The Father already possesses the kingdom of heaven. The Millennium could not refer to the church as a spiritualized form of the kingdom, because the kingdom that Christ will deliver to the Father will include His subjected enemies, of which there are none in the redeemed church. And it will be a kingdom over which Christ exercises total authority, which could not apply to any kingdom the world has known thus far, including the ancient theocracy of Israel during its most faithful days.
The thousand-year reign of Christ can only refer to a literal, earthly kingdom that Jesus Christ could present to the Father in the way Paul describes in 1 Corinthians 15. It is the kingdom of a literal earth, which Christ will literally and personally judge, restore, rejuvenate, and rule in righteousness for a literal one thousand years. And at the end of that time, after Satan is released for a brief period and then permanently defeated and cast into the lake of fire, Christ will present that earthly kingdom to His heavenly Father.1
*

The Process of Judgment
and He will separate them from one another, as the shepherd separates the sheep from the goats; and He will put the sheep on His right, and the goats on the left. Then the King will say to those on His right, “Come, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in; naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me.” Then the righteous will answer Him, saying, “Lord, when did we see You hungry, and feed You, or thirsty, and give You drink? And when did we see You a stranger, and invite You in, or naked, and clothe You? And when did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?” And the King will answer and say to them, “Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.” Then He will also say to those on His left, “Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels; for I was hungry, and you gave Me nothing to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me nothing to drink; I was a stranger, and you did not invite Me in; naked, and you did not clothe Me; sick, and in prison, and you did not visit Me.” Then they themselves also will answer, saying, “Lord, when did we see You hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not take care of You?” Then He will answer them, saying, “Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.” And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life. (25:32b–46)
The process of Christ’s judgment will include the absolute and unerring separation of the saved from the unsaved. When all the nations and peoples of the earth will have been gathered before Him at His return, the Lord Jesus Christ will separate them from one another, as the shepherd separates the sheep from the goats.
In the ancient Near East, as in much of that land still today, sheep and goats are frequently herded together. But sheep are docile, gentle creatures, whereas goats are unruly and rambunctious and can easily upset the sheep. Because they do not feed or rest well together, the shepherd often separates them for grazing and for sleeping at night.
In a similar way the Lord Jesus Christ will separate believers from unbelievers when He returns to establish His millennial kingdom. He will put the believing sheep on His right, the place of favor and blessing. But the unbelieving goats He will put on the left, the place of disfavor and rejection.
In ancient biblical times, a father’s blessing was extremely important, because it determined who would receive the major part of the inheritance. When Jacob was about to bless his two grandsons, Ephraim and Manasseh, he was careful to place his right hand on the one who would receive the inheritance. Because the major blessing normally went to the eldest son, Manasseh was placed on Jacob’s right and Ephraim on his left. But when the time for blessing came, Jacob crossed his hands so that his right hand was on Ephraim’s head rather than Manasseh’s. Against Joseph’s objection, Jacob insisted on giving the major blessing to Ephraim, because God had chosen him over his brother (Gen. 48:8–20).
The Inheritance of the Saved
Then the King will say to those on His right, “Come, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in; naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me.” Then the righteous will answer Him, saying, “Lord, when did we see You hungry, and feed You, or thirsty, and give You drink? And when did we see You a stranger, and invite You in, or naked, and clothe You? And when did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?” And the King will answer and say to them, “Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.” (25:34–40)
Jesus here reveals unequivocally that the Son of Man who sits on the glorious throne (v. 31) is also the Son of God, the divine King. After his subjects are separated, the King will say to those on His right, “Come, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.” Those will be the believers who have survived the holocaust of the Tribulation, and they will be ushered alive into the millennial kingdom, which has been prepared for them from the foundation of the world.
Doubtlessly anticipating the salvation-by-works interpretations that would be made of verses 35–45, the Lord made clear that believers will not inherit the kingdom based on good deeds they will have or will not have performed on earth. Their inheritance was determined countless ages ago, even from the foundation of the world. Those who enter the kingdom will not do so on the basis of the service they have performed for Christ but on the basis of their being blessed by the Father because of their trust in His Son. They will in no way earn a place in the kingdom. A child does not earn an inheritance but receives it on the basis of his being in the family. In exactly the same way, a believer does not earn his way into the kingdom of God but receives it as his rightful inheritance as a child of God and a fellow heir with Jesus Christ (Rom. 8:16–17).
Prepared for you accentuates the selectivity of salvation. From before the time the world was created, God sovereignly chose those who will belong to Him. And “whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the first-born among many brethren” (Rom. 8:29). The source of salvation is the Father’s blessing, the reception of salvation is through faith, and the selectivity of salvation is in the advance preparation of the Father made in ages past. Stressing the same truth, Peter declared, “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to obtain an inheritance which is imperishable and undefiled and will not fade away, reserved in heaven for you, who are protected by the power of God through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time” (1 Pet. 1:3–5).
The good deeds commended in Matthew 25:35–36 are the fruit, not the root, of salvation. It cannot be emphasized too strongly that they are not the basis of entrance into the kingdom. Christ will judge according to works only insofar as those works are or are not a manifestation of redemption, which the heavenly Father has foreordained. If a person has not trusted in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, no amount of seemingly good works done in His name will avail to any spiritual benefit. To such people the Lord will say, “I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness” (Matt. 7:23).
Nevertheless, the genuinely righteous deeds Jesus mentions in verses 35–36 are measurable evidence of salvation, and He therefore highly commends those who have performed them. He is saying, in effect, “Come into My kingdom, because you are the chosen children of My Father, and your relationship to Him is made evident by the service you have rendered to Me by ministering to your fellow believers, who, like you, are My brothers” (v. 40).
The Lord then lists six representative areas of need: being hungry, thirsty, a stranger, naked, sick, and in prison. The kingdom is for those who have ministered to such needs in the lives of God’s people, because those good deeds evidence true, living faith. They are characteristic of God’s children and kingdom citizens. “If a brother or sister is without clothing and in need of daily food,” James warns, “and one of you says to them, ‘Go in peace, be warmed and be filled,’ and yet you do not give them what is necessary for their body, what use is that? Even so faith, if it has no works, is dead, being by itself” (James 2:15–17). John proclaims the same truth in similar words: “Whoever has the world’s goods, and beholds his brother in need and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God abide in Him? Little children, let us not love with word or with tongue, but in deed and truth” (1 John 3:17–18). Scripture is very clear in teaching that the evidence for assurance of true salvation is not found in a past moment of decision but in a continuous pattern of righteous behavior.
The response by those whom the King commends is remarkable and is another proof of their salvation. Because they have ministered in a spirit of humility and selflessness and not to be seen and honored by men (see Matt. 6:2, 5, 16), they have seemingly forgotten about the many things they have done and are surprised that these are worthy of such mention by the Lord.
The King addresses them as the righteous, not simply because they have been declared righteous in Christ but because they have been made righteous by Christ. Their works of service to fellow believers give evidence that they are themselves the product of divine “workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them” (Eph. 2:10).
The good deeds mentioned in these verses all deal with common, everyday needs. There is no mention of monumental undertakings or of spectacular accomplishments (cf. Matt. 7:21–23, where the claim to the spectacular is useless) but only of routine, day-to-day kindnesses that help meet the needs of fellow believers. Nothing more evidences conversion than a life marked by the compassion of God and the meekness and love of Christ. When the disciples of John the Baptist wanted evidence that Jesus was the Messiah, He replied by telling them not just about His spectacular healings but also about how He treated those in need (Matt. 11:4–6). When He announced His messianic credentials to the people of Nazareth, He again reflected not on the amazing but on the way He treated the poor, the prisoners, the blind, and the downtrodden (Luke 4:18–19). The person who belongs to Christ will demonstrate such compassion and be humble about it.
When the King’s self-effacing servants ask, “Lord, when did we do all those things for You?” the King will answer and say to them, “Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.”
The King’s addressing these people as brothers of Mine gives still further evidence that they are already children of God and do not become so because of their good works. The writer of Hebrews declared, “For both He who sanctifies and those who are sanctified are all from one Father; for which reason He is not ashamed to call them brethren” (Heb. 2:11). “The one who joins himself to the Lord is one spirit with Him,” Paul says (1 Cor. 6:17), and because of that union a believer can say, “It is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me, and delivered Himself up for me” (Gal. 2:20).
When the disciples were arguing about which one of them was the greatest in the kingdom of heaven, Jesus set a small child in front of them and said, “Truly I say to you, unless you are converted and become like children, you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 18:3). A person who does not come to Christ in the humble trustfulness that is characteristic of small children will have no part in His kingdom at all, much less be considered great in it. Jesus continued, “Whoever then humbles himself as this child, he is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. And whoever receives one such child in My name receives Me” (vv. 4–5). The physical child standing before them represented the spiritual child of God, the person who is converted (v. 3) by believing in Christ (v. 6). The person who lovingly serves the children of God proves himself to be a child of God.
“He who receives you receives Me,” Jesus told the disciples on another occasion, “and he who receives Me receives Him who sent Me” (Matt. 10:40). Whatever believers do for each other they also do for their Lord Jesus Christ, and the person who genuinely receives and serves Christians in Christ’s name proves he himself is a Christian. The self-giving service of Christians to each other in Christ’s name is a key external mark that identifies them as God’s people. Jesus said, “By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another” (John 13:35).
It is to the practical manifestations of such love that Christ the King will call attention as he ushers the Tribulation saints into His millennial kingdom. Believers during those seven years, especially during the devastating last three and one-half years, will have great need for the basics Jesus has just mentioned. Because of their identity with Christ, they will often be hungry, thirsty, without decent shelter or clothing, sick, imprisoned, and alienated from the mainstream of society.
Those who will have met the needs of fellow believers will themselves have suffered great need. Few, if any, believers during the frightful days of the Tribulation will be able to give out of abundance. Most of them will have resources hardly sufficient to meet their own needs. Their divinely inspired generosity to each other will have set them apart as the Lord’s people even before, as returning King, He publicly declares them to be His own.
The Condemnation of the Unsaved
Then He will also say to those on His left, “Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels; for I was hungry, and you gave Me nothing to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me nothing to drink; I was a stranger, and you did not invite Me in; naked, and you did not clothe Me; sick, and in prison, and you did not visit Me.” Then they themselves also will answer, saying, “Lord, when did we see You hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not take care of You?” Then He will answer them, saying, “Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.” And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life. (25:41–46)
To the lost who will be gathered on His left the King will say, “Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels.” Joining the unredeemable devil and his angels in the eternal fire of hell will be those human beings who refused to believe.
It is just as obvious that Christ does not condemn these people because they failed to serve Him (vv. 42–43) as it is that He does not save the others because they did serve Him (vv. 34–35). These are accursed because they rejected Christ, just as those who enter the kingdom are righteous (v. 37) because they accepted Him. Their rejection of Christ left them in a state where they were not able to do righteous deeds.
Jesus is speaking of eternal separation from God and from His goodness, righteousness, truth, joy, peace, and every other good thing. He is speaking of eternal association with the devil and his angels in the place of torment God prepared for them. He is speaking of eternal isolation, where there will be no fellowship, no consolation, and no encouragement. He is speaking of eternal duration and of eternal affliction, from which there will be no relief or respite.
The evidence that those rejected people never belonged to Christ will be that they did not love and serve His people. Their response to believers’ needs will have been just the opposite of those who enter the kingdom. When, vicariously through the needs of His people, Christ was hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, those unbelievers refused to minister to Him. And in so doing they proved they did not belong to Him.
Like the righteous who are received into the kingdom, the accursed who are rejected will also be amazed at the Lord’s words to them. But they will ask, “Lord, when did we not minister to you in those ways?” He will reply, “Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.” To fail to serve Christ’s people is to fail to serve Him, and to fail to serve Him is to prove one does not belong to Him.
It is significant that the marks of lostness Jesus mentions here are not gross sins committed but rather simple acts of kindness not committed. The five foolish virgins who had no oil for their lamps were not shut out of the wedding feast because they were morally wicked but because they were unprepared for the bridegroom (see Matt. 25:1–13). In the same way, the slave with one talent was not cast into outer darkness because he embezzled the master’s money but because he failed to invest it (vv. 14–30). Also in the same way, a person who is shut out of the kingdom of God is not condemned because of the greatness of his sin but because of the absence of his faith. It is not that those who are damned to hell are equally wretched and vile; their common reason for damnation is lack of faith.
Jesus uses the same word (aiōnios, eternal) to describe salvation and condemnation. If believers will be in heaven with God forever, the lost will be in hell with the devil forever.
Since the millennial kingdom will be worldwide, there will be no place on earth for the accursed to go. They will be slain on the spot and go immediately into the eternal punishment of hell, suffering permanent, everlasting crystallization of their state of spiritual death. At the end of the thousand years their bodies will be raised (cf. John 5:28–29), and they will again stand before God for final sentencing and final condemnation in bodies suited for hell’s torments.
But the righteous will go away into eternal life, to spend all eternity glorified with their Lord and Savior. In marvelous contrast to the prospect of the accursed, at the end of the thousand-year earthly kingdom the righteous will discover that their eternal blessedness will only have begun.

Christ’s Coming and the Gentile Nations (Matt. 25:31–46)
This section explains to us how Jesus Christ will judge the Gentile nations. The word nations in Matthew 25:32 means “Gentiles,” and it is in the neuter gender in the Greek. The word them in that same verse is in the masculine. This means that the nations will be gathered before Jesus Christ, but He will judge them as individuals. This will not be a judgment of groups (Germany, Italy, Japan, etc.) but of individuals within these nations.
We must not confuse this judgment with the Great White Throne Judgment described in Revelation 20:11–15. Some scholars merge both passages and call this “the general judgment.” The Bible knows nothing of a “general judgment.” This judgment takes place on earth immediately after the Battle of Armageddon. The White Throne Judgment takes place in space somewhere (“the earth and the heaven fled away,” Rev. 20:11). The judgment here in Matthew 25 takes place before the kingdom is established on earth, for the saved are told to “inherit the kingdom” (Matt. 25:34). The White Throne Judgment will take place after the 1,000-year reign of Christ (Rev. 20:7ff).
There is another error we must avoid. We must not force this passage to teach salvation by good works. A superficial reading would give the impression that helping one’s neighbor is sufficient to earn salvation and go to heaven. But this is not the message of this passage. Nobody at any time in the history of the world was ever saved by good works.
The Old Testament saints were saved by faith (Heb. 11); the New Testament saints were saved by faith in Jesus Christ (Eph. 2:8–10). People today are saved the same way. The gospel of “do good” is not a scriptural message. It is right for believers to do good (Gal. 6:10; Heb. 13:16), but this is not the way unbelievers can be saved.
If we keep in mind the three groups in the account, it will help to solve this problem: There were sheep, goats, and brethren. Who are these people that the King dares to call “My brethren”? It seems likely that they are the believing Jews from the Tribulation period. These are people who will hear the message of the 144,000 and trust Jesus Christ. Since these believing Jews will not receive the “mark of the beast” (Rev. 13:16–17), they will be unable to buy or sell. How, then, can they survive? Through the loving care of the Gentiles who have trusted Christ and who care for His brethren.
The interesting thing about this judgment is that the sheep individuals are surprised at what they hear. They will not remember having seen the Lord Jesus Christ and ministering to His needs. But just as they lovingly ministered to the believing Jews, they did it to Christ. Their motive was not reward, but sacrificial love. In fact, these Gentiles took their own lives in their hands when they welcomed the homeless Jews and cared for them. “He that receiveth you receiveth Me,” Jesus said to His disciples (Matt. 10:40); and surely this would also apply to His brethren.
The individuals designated goats were judged because they did not trust Jesus Christ and give evidence of that faith by caring for His brethren. They apparently received the mark of the beast and took care of themselves and their own, but they had no time for the Jewish remnant that was suffering on earth (Rev. 12:17). There are sins of omission as well as sins of commission (James 4:17). Not doing good is the moral equivalent of doing evil.
When we compare the two judicial sentences (Matt. 25:34, 41), we discover some interesting truths. To begin with, the sheep were blessed of the Father; but it does not say that the goats were “cursed of the Father.” The sheep inherit the kingdom, and inheritance is based on birth. Because they had been born again through faith, they inherited the kingdom.
This kingdom was prepared for these saved individuals, but Matthew 25:41 does not state that the everlasting fire was prepared for the goats. It was prepared for the devil and his angels (Rev. 20:10). God never prepared hell for people. There is no evidence from Scripture that God predestines people to go to hell. If sinners listen to Satan, and follow his ways, they will end up where he ends up—in the torments of hell. There are only two eternal destinies: everlasting punishment for those who reject Christ or eternal life for those who trust Him.
The sheep will be ushered into the kingdom to share in Christ’s glory. The church will be reigning with Christ, and Israel will enjoy the fulfillment of the promises made through the prophets. All of creation will share in the glorious liberty of God’s children (Rom. 8:19–21). Jesus Christ will rule from David’s throne in Jerusalem (Luke 1:30–33), and peace will reign for 1,000 years (Isa. 11).
As we look back over the Olivet Discourse, we should review several facts. To begin with, God is not finished with the people of Israel. Jesus made it clear in this sermon that Israel would be purified and brought to faith in the Messiah. God has not cast away His people (Rom. 11:1ff).
Second, the Old Testament promises of the kingdom will be fulfilled. The Tribulation period will be a very difficult time for people on the earth. But it will be “travail” in preparation for the birth of the kingdom. The suffering will lead to glory.
Third, God is going to judge this world. He is not sending cataclysmic judgments today because this is a day of grace when His message is, “Be you reconciled to God” (2 Cor. 5:14ff). The heavens are silent because man’s sins have already been judged at the Cross. God has spoken once and for all through His Son, and He will not speak to this earth again until He sends His judgments during the Tribulation.
Fourth, we as Christians and members of His church are not looking for signs. “The Jews require a sign” (1 Cor. 1:22). There will be no signs given prior to the sudden return of Christ in the air for His church. However, as we see some of these Tribulation signs beginning (“When these things begin to take place,” Luke 21:28, nasb), we feel that the end is not far away. It seems that international tensions and problems are increasing to the point where the world will cry out for a dictator, and Satan will have his candidate ready.
Finally, no matter what view of prophecy we take, we know that Jesus is coming again. As Christians, we must be alert and ready. We must not waste our opportunities. We may not have a great deal of ability or a great many gifts, but we can still be faithful in the calling He has given us.
31–46. The judgment of the nations concludes our Lord’s prophetic discourse. Christ’s return in his glory to be enthroned on the throne of his glory marks the great interruption of history as He brings the Tribulation Period to an end and ushers in the millennial kingdom. This judgment of all nations must be distinguished from the Great White Throne Judgment at the end of the Millennium. The nations (Gr ethnos) are those peoples living through the Tribulation on earth at the time of Christ’s return. This is a judgment of separation: sheep on his right … goats on the left. At this judgment all nations (better, “all Gentiles”) stand before Christ who then separates the sheep (the saved) from the goats (the lost) in a manner reminiscent of the wheat and tares parable. Some view this as the last general judgment (Atkinson, p. 801), whereas premillennial commentators see this as the judgment of the nations who have survived the Tribulation Period, with the saved going into the millennial kingdom. Note that these are living nations, whereas the Great White Throne Judgment is one of the wicked dead whose bodies are resurrected to face the final judgment of the lost. Thus, the saved are invited to come into and share the blessings of His Kingdom: Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom. The basis of their acceptance seems to be their treatment of the least of these my brethren, i.e., the saved of the Tribulation. The acts of kindness (vss. 35–38) were done by these sheep nations unto the persecuted Jewish believers and their converts during the reign of the Antichrist and now bring the blessing of God’s salvation upon these nations. The acts of kindness do not themselves merit salvation apart from the atonement of Christ. Since the nations are the Gentiles and “my brethren” are neither, they must be the Jews. The goats are banished into everlasting fire or hell. Both the judgment and the blessed life are designated by the same adjective, “eternal” (Gr aionios), clearly indicating their equal duration. This eternal judgment is in keeping with Revelation 14:11; 19:15. No unsaved adults are admitted into the millennial kingdom when it is begun on earth. A natural and legitimate conclusion, then, is that the Rapture must occur before this event. Thus, the Rapture precedes the Tribulation Period, which itself precedes the millennial kingdom.2

116
THE JUDGMENT OF CHRIST
Matthew 25:31–46

If someone were to ask me, concerning all the doctrines taught in the Bible, which three are most hated, I would say that they are the doctrines of hell, predestination, and the last judgment. We can only imagine how odious would be a biblical passage that sets forth all three of these doctrines. However, that is what we find in the passage that is before us in this chapter.
This chapter will complete our study of the Olivet Discourse, which is found in Matthew 24 and 25. In the most recent passages we have examined, Jesus taught His disciples some important lessons about how they should await His coming. First, He counseled them to be vigilant (24:45–51), for, He said, no one knows the day and hour of His coming except God the Father (24:36). Second, by means of the parable of the wise and foolish virgins, Jesus taught them to be prepared for His coming (25:1–13). Third, in the parable of the talents, He told His disciples to be diligent and productive while they waited (25:14–30). Again, we are not sure whether He was instructing them at that point to be ready for His coming in judgment on Jerusalem in AD 70 or His final coming, which is yet to happen. However, it matters little, for just as the disciples needed to be prepared and productive as they waited for the destruction of Jerusalem, so we need to be prepared and productive as we await His climactic return.
As He closed this discourse, Jesus seems to have been addressing His final return, for here He foretold what will happen at the end of the age. All the nations will be gathered before Him, He said, and He will make a separation. That is, He will judge each and every individual. Sadly, He will find some who were not vigilant, who were unprepared, and who were not productive before His return.
Separating Sheep and Goats
Matthew tells us that Jesus said, “When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory” (v. 31). This is the first time in all of Scripture when Jesus clearly referred to Himself not only as the Son of Man but also as the King, for He said He will sit on “the throne of His glory.” He then added, “All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats. And He will set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left” (vv. 32–33). Jesus’ throne will be a throne of judgment. The first thing He will do when He comes in His glory will be to gather everyone from every nation before His throne. Then that gathering will be followed immediately by a separation.
This kind of teaching is very hard for people in modern Western culture, which embraces pluralism, relativism, and universalism, and which has an incurable allergy to any hint of exclusion. The idea of separation goes completely against the grain of our culture, especially since this particular separation means that some will enter the blessedness of eternal life in heaven and the rest will enter the everlasting misery of judgment in hell. Most Westerners, even in the church, believe it will be easy to pass through the last judgment on their way to heaven. We make jokes about St. Peter at the pearly gates, and he always seems to be blind to any sins that would preclude someone’s entrance into heaven. We live in a world and in a nation that believes in salvation by death. All you have to do to go to heaven is to die.
When Jesus spoke of this separation He will make, He used the metaphor of sheep and goats. He also likened His judgment to a shepherd dividing sheep from goats. Vesta and I grew up in a suburb outside of Pittsburgh, very close to the farmlands of the region. If we drove just a mile or two out of our town, we could see pastures where cows grazed in some fields, sheep in others, and goats in still others. We never saw these three types of animals grazing together, so it was not difficult for us to distinguish the sheep from the goats. But we were on a trip in a third-world country a few years ago, and the tour guide pointed out a pasture that held both sheep and goats, and we could not tell the difference, at least not from our vantage point. We would have needed to get much closer and have detailed knowledge of the anatomy of sheep and goats in order to distinguish them.
In ancient Israel, just as in that third-world country, it was common for sheep and goats to be kept together. But the animals had to be separated on a daily basis. As the evening began to fall, the shepherd would go into his fields and draw all of the goats away because they did not have that wonderful wool sweater to protect them as the temperature began to drop. The goats needed more warmth, so the shepherd would go out and make this separation and bring the goats into a warmer place. The shepherd, of course, was intimately familiar with his animals, so he was well able to make that separation.
However, Jesus did not suggest He will separate the figurative sheep and goats for some utilitarian reason, as did the shepherds of Israel. Rather, He will separate them so as to place the sheep on His right and the goats on His left, that is, in the place of honor and dishonor respectively.
Blessed Sheep
Jesus then began to tell His disciples what He will say to these two groups, speaking first to the sheep: “Then the King will say to those on His right hand, ‘Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: for I was hungry and you gave Me food; I was thirsty and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger and you took Me in; I was naked and you clothed Me; I was sick and you visited Me; I was in prison and you came to Me’ ” (vv. 34–36).
The sheep, He will say, are “blessed of My Father,” so they will inherit “the kingdom prepared for [them] from the foundation of the world.” The ultimate blessing the Father gives to any human being is the blessing of being His gift to the Son. Elsewhere Jesus said, “All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out” (John 6:37). In His High Priestly Prayer on the night when He was betrayed, He said, “Those whom You gave Me I have kept; and none of them is lost except the son of perdition, that the Scripture might be fulfilled” (John 17:12). These individuals whom the Father gave to the Son have been predestined to inherit the kingdom of God from the foundation of the world.
When the Father adopts us into His family, we become, as it were, younger brothers and sisters of Jesus, who is the singular heir of the Father (Gal. 4:5; Eph. 1:5). Thus, we become joint heirs of the Father with Him (Rom. 8:17). At the last judgment, Jesus will say to us: “You’re in the will. You were put in the will from the foundation of the world.” You were not put into the will because God foresaw with His omniscience what you would do when you heard the gospel. Before you were born, before you ever did any good or bad thing, that the purposes of God’s sovereign grace may be established and that the Son of God might be honored for eternity, God ordained you to be His heir and wrote your name in the Lamb’s book of life (Rom. 9:10–13).
Whenever my grandchildren do anything that remotely displeases me (yes, it happens occasionally), my standard response is, “You’re out of the will.” We know how painful it is to be disinherited in this world. But to be excluded from the inheritance of the kingdom of God is the worst calamity that can befall a human being.
This doctrine of predestination causes not just confusion and bewilderment but fury, even among professing Christians. This always baffles me. There is no greater demonstration of grace than this doctrine, because I cannot point to any reason why am I in the kingdom of God and someone else is not. It certainly is not because of something I have done.
At this point, you might be thinking: “This whole text is about works, about feeding the hungry, giving drink to the thirsty, taking in strangers, clothing the naked, and visiting the sick and the prisoners. Doesn’t that show that works are involved in salvation?” It might seem so, but we are told over and over again in Scripture that justification is by faith alone. Thus, works play no part in salvation. However, justification is not by a faith that is alone; it is not by a mere profession of faith. Anyone who possesses saving faith immediately begins to do good works. We are not justified by our works in any way whatsoever, but we are justified to good works. Thus, the ultimate test by which we will be determined to be in Christ or not is the presence or absence of fruit. On the last day, our professions of faith will be judged by the works we have performed. Again, we are not justified by our works, but if we do not have works, that is clear evidence that we do not have saving faith.
Jesus showed that good works come naturally to those who are justified. He said: “Then the righteous will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry and feed You, or thirsty and give You drink? When did we see You a stranger and take You in, or naked and clothe You? Or when did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?’ And the King will answer and say to them, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did it to Me’ ” (vv. 37–40). The sheep will not be aware that they were serving Jesus when they served their neighbors. They simply did what the Spirit laid upon their hearts to do. But in that service, they were obeying Christ.
Cursed Goats
Jesus told His disciples that He will have a very different message for the goats. He said: “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels: for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink; I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me’ ” (vv. 41–43). These will be told to depart from Jesus into everlasting fire, for they are cursed, not blessed. Why? Because they failed to do the very things the righteous did: feed the hungry, give drink to the thirsty, take in strangers, and so on.
Jesus added: “Then they also will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’ ” (v. 44). The implication here seems to be that if they had ever seen Jesus in such need, they certainly would have ministered to Him. But by committing sins of omission in failing to minister to Jesus’ people, to the least of these who belong to Him, they failed Him. As Jesus said, “Then He will answer them, saying, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me’ ” (v. 45). The goats will not have the works to show they are justified. So, “these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life” (v. 46).
There is no purgatory. “It is appointed for men to die once, but after this the judgment” (Heb. 9:27). There is no second chance. There is no reincarnation to a new life on this earth. The only reincarnation is the resurrection of the body for heaven or for hell. That is why it is so perilous to keep evading the issue, dodging the question. A judgment awaits each of us, a judgment according to the standards of God’s righteousness. Remember what Paul said to the Athenians: “These times of ignorance God overlooked, but now commands all men everywhere to repent” (Acts 17:30). Why? “Because He has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained” (v. 31a).
Do yourself a favor. Before you go to bed tonight, before you fall asleep, ask yourself: “Am I a sheep? Am I a goat? Is my faith real? What is my destiny?” Jesus is going to return one day, and when He does, judgment will happen. Make sure you are prepared.3


1 MacArthur, J. F., Jr. (1985). Matthew (Vol. 4, pp. 109–120). Chicago: Moody Press.
2 Hindson, E. E., & Kroll, W. M. (Eds.). (1994). KJV Bible Commentary (pp. 1951–1952). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
3 Sproul, R. C. (2013). Matthew (pp. 731–736). Wheaton, IL: Crossway.

Friday, December 29, 2017

the talents

6. The Parable of the Talents, 25:14–30
14 “For it is like a man going abroad, who called his own servants and handed over his property to them. 15 And to one he gave five talents, to another two, to another one, to each according to his own ability; and he went on his journey. 16 At once he who had received the five talents went and worked with them, and he gained another five. 17 Likewise he who had the two gained another two. 18 But he who received the one went away and dug in the ground, and hid his master’s money. 19 Now after a long time the master of those servants comes and settles accounts with them. 20 And he who had received the five talents came and brought another five talents, saying, ‘Sir, you handed over to me five talents; look, I have gained five talents more.’ 21 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant; you were faithful over a few things, I will appoint you over many things; enter the joy of your master.’ 22 And he also who had the two talents said, ‘Sir, you handed over to me two talents; look, I have gained two talents more.’ 23 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant; you were faithful over a few things, I will appoint you over many things; enter the joy of your master.’ 24 But he also who had received the one talent came and said, ‘Sir, I knew that you are a hard man, reaping where you did not sow and gathering where you did not scatter. 25 And being afraid I went off and hid your talent in the ground; look, you have your own.’ 26 But his master answered him, saying, ‘You wicked and lazy servant, you knew that I reap where I did not sow, and gather where I did not scatter. 27 You ought therefore to have put my money with the bankers, and when I came I would have received my own with interest. 28 Take therefore the talent from him, and give it to him who has the ten talents; 29 for to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have abundance; but from him who has not, even what he has will be taken from him. 30 And throw the unprofitable servant into the outer darkness; there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth.’ ”
There are resemblances between this parable and that narrated in Luke 19:11–27; indeed, some scholars see the two as differing forms of the same parable. But the differences in the two accounts are formidable; therefore it is better to see them as two distinct parables, though with the same basic theme of servants trading with their master’s money. But in Matthew the amounts are large, while in Luke they are quite small; in this Gospel the amounts vary from servant to servant, in that one they all receive the same amount. Luke’s story brings in a reference to a man receiving a kingdom and to the attitude of his subjects, whereas that in Matthew concentrates on trading. The story in Luke teaches that all the servants of God have one basic task, that of living out our faith; this one starts with the fact of the different gifts to be found in God’s servants and brings out the way they use (or do not use) those gifts.
14. The story starts rather abruptly with “For it is like” without any explanation of what it signifies. But since the story follows on a parable explicitly said to refer to “the kingdom of heaven” (v. 1), there is no reason for doubting that it carries on the teaching about the kingdom (GNB makes this explicit with “At that time the Kingdom of heaven will be like—”). The preceding parable has taught the importance of being ready; this one carries on that theme by showing what readiness means.21 The kingdom, then, is likened to a man going abroad. This man was obviously a man of means, and he wanted to have his money used profitably while he was away. He summoned his own servants23 and passed over to them the money he wanted them to invest while he was away.
15. That the money was calculated in talents presents us with a problem, for a talent was a measure of weight, not a specific unity of currency. It was the largest weight in normal use (see on 18:24), and when used for money it might refer to either gold or silver or copper. Attempts to render the equivalent in modern monetary terms run up against difficulties: we do not know exactly what weight the talent was in Palestine in New Testament times, nor do we know whether gold or silver or copper is in mind here, and, of course, with inflation and the like modern currencies vary in worth. All that we can say is that five talents26 represents a considerable sum of money, two was not a small amount, and one was a sum not to be disregarded. The fact that different amounts were allotted to different servants seems to mean that the master thought one of them distinctly more able than the others, the second one to be a man of some ability, and the third to be distinctly less capable than the first two. No instructions are recorded, and we are left to understand that the master wanted the servants to use their own initiative. He wanted them to trade as best they could with the money he had left with them, but he did not want to tie them down with binding instructions when he could not tell what conditions would be like throughout his absence. Having allotted his money as he saw best, he went off.
16. There is a little problem related to the way we should take at once. Since there is no punctuation in our oldest MSS, it is possible to take it as the last word in verse 15 (as KJV, “and straightway took his journey”) or as the first word in verse 16 (as most modern translations). The sense seems to require this latter view; if we accept it, Jesus is saying that the first servant immediately set to work. He does not say what that servant did, and it is of no great importance. What matters is that he worked28 with them. This signifies that he put them to good use in some way. In time diligence was rewarded, for the five talents entrusted to him became ten. His activity resulted in the doubling of his original capital.
17. There is little to be said about the second servant. He was also a diligent worker, and he likewise doubled his original capital. He gained but two talents, but then his base was narrower than that of his colleague who had gained five. Both had done well; both had doubled the amount entrusted to them.
18. The third servant was a very different kind of person (“a mouse-minded man,” Meier). The word But, which introduces this section of the story, has adversative force; this man forms a contrast to those mentioned earlier. Jesus says nothing about his reasoning at this point, but simply that he hid the money. Not for him the labor of buying and selling, working and making a profit. He simply dug a hole and hid his master’s money. This was a not uncommon way of hiding objects for safekeeping in antiquity (cf. 13:44). If it was carefully done, nobody other than the person who dug the hole would know where it was and what was in it. Jesus does not indicate at this point why the man did this (laziness? fear?). The important thing for this man was that the money was secure and that he could produce it when the time came. Keeping it in this way meant that there was no possibility of loss, but it also meant that there was no possibility of gain.
19. The period of the master’s absence is not specified, but it was a long time; it was this that enabled the first two servants to increase their capital by 100 percent. The master then comes and settles accounts with them (the present tenses introduce a note of vividness). The day of reckoning had come.
20. The first to give account of himself was the first to have received the money. After the one sentence with the vivid present tenses the past tenses are resumed. The man who had been entrusted with five talents brought his original sum plus the money he had gained and explained to his master that he had made a gain of five talents. In both clauses he puts emphasis on the amount: “Five talents you gave me; look, another five talents I have gained.”
21. His master commended this servant. First he says simply, “Well,” which we normally put into English with “Well done,” but which could be taken in some such sense as “It is well.” Or we could understand it as an interjection, “Bravo!” (BDF 102[3]). However we take it, it is a mark of approval. This is something the master understands and approves. He goes on to salute the servant as good and faithful, an expression that approves both his character and his diligence; he had been all that the master expected (Cassirer translates, “excellent and trustworthy servant”). The master goes on to develop the thought of faithfulness. The servant, he says, has been faithful over a few things. Clearly Jesus wants his hearers to understand that the master was a very rich man. While we do not know exactly how much five talents were worth in our money, it seems clear that it was a considerable sum. But the master can speak of it as no more than a few things. Now that the servant has proved himself in what the master regards as a comparatively lowly piece of service, further doors of opportunity will be opened to him. “I will appoint you over many things” indicates that the faithful servant will be rewarded with a position that will give him more scope for the use of the abilities that he has shown he possesses. Once again Jesus is teaching that the reward for good work is the opportunity of doing further work. “Enter the joy of your master” may be understood in the sense of REB, “share your master’s joy.” Whether that is the way to take it or not, it clearly means that the servant has received the warm approval of his master and that his future is one in which joy will be prominent.
22–23. The process is repeated with almost identical wording in the case of the servant who had been given two talents. The man reports as his predecessor had reported with the one change of two talents for “five talents,” and he receives his commendation in exactly the same terms. It is noteworthy that though he had gained but two talents, his praise is in words identical with that given the man with five. They had both doubled the sum entrusted to them, and they were both congratulated for doing so. The actual size of their gain was not as important as the fact that each had doubled the amount entrusted to him.
24. Finally there came also the man who had received the one talent. He used the same polite address as the other two, “Sir,” but diverges by going into a description of his owner. He says, “I knew that you are a hard man”; he puts this forward to excuse his failure to do anything with his talent, but in doing so he takes away some of his defense. If he knew that his master was a hard man, he knew also that he had been expected to do something profitable with the money entrusted to him. He explains something of what hardness means in this case. “Reaping where you did not sow” means that the master had the habit of enjoying a crop on which he had expended no labor. “Gathering where you did not scatter” probably has much the same meaning; it refers to the winnowing process at the end of harvest (as it does in 3:12), plying the winnowing shovel to scatter the mingled chaff and grain and thus separate the two. The sowing and the scattering refer to the processes that began and completed the getting of a crop. The master, this man says, profited from sowing and winnowing where he had not gone through the hard work of using the plough and plying the winnowing shovel. The picture this servant draws is of a man with an eye to business; he picked up profits in all sorts of places and not only those that resulted from his own hard work.
25. All this is said to explain his reaction to being left to look after a talent. He says that he was afraid, evidently afraid that if he used the money in business undertakings as his fellow servants were doing he would lose it and thus make himself liable to punishment. So, he says, “I hid your talent in the ground.” This made him certain of losing nothing, but it also meant that when he was face to face with his master he could say nothing better than “look, you have your own.”
26. But is adversative; far from accepting the explanation, the master was about to rebuke his servant. He did this, calling him both wicked and lazy. It was a wicked thing to receive money from his master and fail to use it to the best advantage, whatever his motive. But in any case, his motive was something for which he could be blamed, and the master says that he is lazy. He let a natural disinclination for work cooperate with a dislike for getting some gain for his master, with the result that he did nothing. He felt that his preservation of the talent was something for which he should receive credit. He did not realize that anyone with a talent must use it. The master accepts the description of himself as reaping what he did not sow and gathering what he did not winnow,40 but interestingly he drops the word “hard” that the defaulter had applied to him. It may well be that he is not saying that he really is the kind of man he has been said to be, but saying that if the third servant really thought that he was like that he would have acted in a different manner. What the servant had done was not in accordance with a genuine belief that his master reaped where he did not sow, gathered where he did not winnow.
27. The master points out how easily the servant could have made some gain, even if he mistrusted his own ability to trade profitably. “You ought” is a strong term; the master is thinking of the easiest possible way of getting a profit, and at the very least this is something that the man was under an obligation to do. So he says that the servant should have put his money with the bankers, a procedure that he could have undertaken with safety and no great personal exertion. The result would have been that his master44 would have profited from the interest earned. As it was, he got his money back, but nothing more.
28. Having rebuked his servant and made it clear why he was being blamed, the master proceeds to the action required in that situation. “Take therefore the talent from him,” he says. Therefore is important. The master is not acting in an arbitrary fashion. The man has had the money for quite some time and has shown that he has no intention of making any use of it. Left with him it would stay buried in the ground. But money should be used, and therefore it was necessary to take the money away. “Give it to him who has the ten talents,” he goes on. That man has shown that he knows how to use money profitably. He will make the best use of it, and therefore it should be left with him.
29. This verse largely repeats the words of 13:12 (where see the comments), and the small alterations make no difference to the sense. Jesus is not countenancing business practices that enable the wealthy to become wealthier at the expense of the deserving poor. He is laying down a principle of the spiritual life, a principle of great importance. Anyone who has a talent (using the word in the modern sense) of any kind and fails to use it, by that very fact forfeits it. By contrast, anyone who has a talent and uses it to the full finds that that talent develops and grows. This is a law of the spiritual life, and we neglect it at our peril. The parable illustrates both possibilities. The servants who used what they had saw it grow; the one who refused to use what he had lost it. Jesus’ followers are warned.
    1. The servant who failed to use the talent entrusted to him is now characterized as unprofitable. He has had control of a full talent and has buried it. He has failed completely when he had the opportunity to do something useful.47 So he is consigned to the outer darkness, where there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth. With one exception, this expression combining the thoughts of punishment and of deep grief is found in Matthew only (see the note on 8:12). It stands for complete and final rejection and for unceasing sorrow and regret. We should bear in mind that this is not here pronounced over someone who has done some particularly heinous crime. It is the final result for the man who had only one talent and who steadfastly refused to use it.1

This parable focuses primarily upon the useless servant. Gifts that are not used are lost. The title “talents” is unfortunate, in that in our language we use the word “talent” to refer to natural aptitudes or abilities that people have. The talent in this story was a weight, and its value depended on whether the object weighed was copper, silver, or gold. In the story, talents were given to the several men according to their “abilities” (v. 15). It would be best to interpret the talents as opportunities. And in the parable each of the men is given opportunity according to ability and is expected to serve faithfully. This is a parable on responsibility.
There is a story that Archelaus went to Rome (4 b.c.) to get his kingship over Judea confirmed. A party of fifty Jews went as an embassy to Rome to resist the appointment, but did not succeed. The revenge he inflicted upon the Jews after his return was not soon forgotten. Such a story supplies emotional background for the weight of this illustration. But in Jesus’ story, the issue is not revenge but accountability. The gift and the responsibility were commensurate. The men who had received five and two talents respectively took risks; they applied themselves actively in their responsibility. But the unfaithful servant thought only of himself and his security, risked nothing, and achieved nothing.
On the Master’s return there is an accounting from each. The two servants, representing faithful disciples, had transformed privilege into action. The response of the Master carries the note of eschatological joy; the “good and faithful” servants enter the joy of their Master. But as soon as the unfaithful servant opens his mouth, it is evident that he was not interested in his Lord’s cause or advantage but rather in saving his own skin. One who cannot venture his own person cannot take risks for the sake of his Lord! He was judged according to his conduct. What was given was taken away, “For whosoever shall save his life shall lose it… .” The story closes with the language of destruction in outer darkness—the symbol of the anguish of ultimate separation.
As one of the Parousia parables, this is a striking lesson on our responsibility. A possible but simple outline follows: The Master (1) entrusted responsibility to his servants; (2) increased responsibility for faithfulness; (3) judged inexcusable irresponsibility. (See Rom. 2 on God’s judgment.)2

The Signs of Christ’s Coming—Part 9: The Tragedy of Wasted Opportunity (Working Until Christ’s Return)
(25:14–30)
9


For it is just like a man about to go on a journey, who called his own slaves, and entrusted his possessions to them. And to one he gave five talents, to another, two, and to another, one, each according to his own ability; and he went on his journey. Immediately the one who had received the five talents went and traded with them, and gained five more talents. In the same manner the one who had received the two talents gained two more. But he who received the one talent went away and dug in the ground, and hid his master’s money. Now after a long time the master of those slaves came and settled accounts with them. And the one who had received the five talents came up and brought five more talents, saying, “Master, you entrusted five talents to me; see, I have gained five more talents.” His master said to him, “Well done, good and faithful slave; you were faithful with a few things, I will put you in charge of many things, enter into the joy of your master.” The one also who had received the two talents came up and said, “Master, you entrusted to me two talents; see, I have gained two more talents.” His master said to him, “Well done, good and faithful slave; you were faithful with a few things, I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.” And the one also who had received the one talent came up and said, “Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed. And I was afraid, and went away and hid your talent in the ground; see, you have what is yours.” But his master answered and said to him, “You wicked, lazy slave, you knew that I reap where I did not sow, and gather where I scattered no seed. Then you ought to have put my money in the bank, and on my arrival I would have received my money back with interest. Therefore take away the talent from him, and give it to the one who has the ten talents.” For to everyone who has shall more be given, and he shall have an abundance; but from the one who does not have, even what he does have shall be taken away. And cast out the worthless slave into the outer darkness; in that place there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. (25:14–30)
In his poem Maud Muller, John Greenleaf Whittier wrote the well-known lines, “For all sad words of tongue or pen, the saddest are these: ‘It might have been!’ ”
Scripture is replete with admonitions to take advantage of opportunity while it is available. Solomon wrote, “Cast your bread on the surface of the waters, for you will find it after many days,” and, “Sow your seed in the morning and do not be idle in the evening, for you do not know whether morning or evening sowing will succeed, or whether both of them alike will be good” (Eccles. 11:1, 6). That same man of wisdom wrote, “He who gathers in summer is a son who acts wisely, but he who sleeps in harvest is a son who acts shamefully” (Prov. 10:5). His father, David, had written, “As for me, my prayer is to Thee, O Lord, at an acceptable time” (Ps. 69:13). Another psalmist wrote, “Come, let us worship and bow down; let us kneel before the Lord our Maker. For He is our God, and we are the people of His pasture, and the sheep of His hand. Today, if you would hear His voice, do not harden your hearts” (Ps. 95:6–8).
Isaiah exhorted, “Seek the Lord while He may be found; call upon Him while He is near” (Isa. 55:6). Jeremiah reminded his readers that “even the stork in the sky knows her seasons; and the turtledove and the swift and the thrush observe the time of their migration; but My people do not know the ordinance of the Lord” (Jer. 8:7; cf. Heb. 3:7–8). Paraphrasing his preceding quotation from Isaiah, Paul admonished the Corinthian believers, “Behold, now is ‘the acceptable time,’ behold, now is ‘the day of salvation’ ” (2 Cor. 6:2; cf. Isa. 49:8).
Jesus repeatedly called on men to make the most of spiritual opportunities. “For a little while longer the light is among you. Walk while you have the light, that darkness may not overtake you; he who walks in the darkness does not know where he goes. While you have the light, believe in the light, in order that you may become sons of light” (John 12:35–36).
The tragedy of wasted opportunity is the theme of Jesus’ parable of the talents, the second of two parables relating to the kingdom of heaven and, in particular, to men’s readiness for Jesus’ coming to establish the kingdom at His second coming (see Matt. 25:1). The parable of the virgins (vv. 1–13) focuses on readiness manifested in waiting, whereas the parable of the talents focuses on readiness manifested in working. The five virgins who had oil for their lamps represent believers who possess saving grace; the two faithful servants who invested their talents represent believers who exhibit the serving life. Together the two parables depict the balance of believers’ looking forward to His coming with anticipation while living in preparedness for His coming through faithful service.
Frequently, one or the other of those precepts either is lost or overemphasized. Although believers are to rejoice continually in the prospect of their Lord’s coming again, they are not to sit back in idleness and do nothing. Saving faith is serving faith. On the other hand, they are not to become so caught up in serving the Lord that they forget to contemplate and rejoice in His return. It was perhaps because they thought the Lord was coming momentarily that some of the believers at Thessalonica fell into undisciplined, careless living and decided to do no work at all. Consequently they became busybodies who did nothing productive and even disrupted the church. Paul rebuked them severely and commanded them “to work in quiet fashion and eat their own bread.” He then admonished the whole church not to “grow weary of doing good” (2 Thess. 3:10–13).
Peter challenged mockers who had the opposite problem. They were so convinced that the Lord would not come soon that they abandoned all moral restraint and lived in selfish profligacy (2 Pet. 3:3–4). Peter reminded them that the people of Noah’s day responded in the same way to Noah’s prediction of the Flood, which came upon them suddenly and at a time they did not expect. In the same way, the apostle declared, Christ will appear suddenly in the end time, bringing the “judgment and destruction of ungodly men” (vv. 5–7).
It should be noted that, despite some resemblances, the parable of the talents and the parable of the minas (Luke 19:11–27) are not variations of the same story. The mina parable was given several days earlier, and the two accounts have as many differences as similarities.
Though the parable of the talents has relevance to every generation, the Lord was still speaking directly about the generation that will be living just before His return in glory (24:34), the exact time of which will not be known in advance but the imminence of which will be manifested by spectacular and unmistakable signs (24:3–29).
The parable of the talents illustrates four basic aspects of spiritual opportunity: the responsibility we receive, the reaction we have, the reckoning we face, and the reward we gain.
The Responsibility We Receive
For it is just like a man about to go on a journey, who called his own slaves, and entrusted his possessions to them. And to one he gave five talents, to another, two, and to another, one, each according to his own ability; and he went on his journey. (25:14–15)
The antecedent of it is the kingdom of heaven (see v. 1), of which this parable is another illustration. Some translations add “the kingdom of heaven” to verse 14 in italics to make the connection clear. Even the phrase it is appears in italics in the nasb , being added because there is no main subject or verb in the Greek text of this verse. Both subject and verb are understood to continue over from verse 1, namely, “the kingdom of heaven will be comparable to,” making it obvious that Jesus is continuing to teach about the kingdom.
As frequently mentioned in this commentary series, it is important to understand that in the New Testament the kingdom of heaven and its synonymous phrase, the kingdom of God, refer to the sphere of God’s dominion in Christ. But while maintaining that basic meaning, the expression is used in two distinct ways. Sometimes it designates the invisible body of all redeemed people. The Lord used it in that sense when He declared, “Truly I say to you, unless you are converted and become like children, you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 18:3; cf. 25:34). That is the kingdom in its pure, exclusive sense.
But sometimes the kingdom of heaven refers to the visible, outward body of those who profess to know and serve Christ. Jesus made clear that in that outward manifestation of the kingdom both the true and the false will be found, the genuine Christian and the imitation (see section on Matt. 13).
It is in this visible, outward sense that Jesus refers to the kingdom both in the parable of the virgins and in the parable of the talents. The foolish virgins and the faithless slave do not represent professed pagans, atheists, agnostics, or reprobates but those who profess to belong to Christ. In each account, both genuine and counterfeit believers are depicted.
The man who was about to go on a journey obviously was planning to be gone for a long time, perhaps for many months or even a year or more. In order for his estate to be well managed in his absence, he called his own slaves, and entrusted his possessions to them.
The fact that these were his own slaves reinforces the idea that Jesus was illustrating the outward, organizational church, composed of those who allege to belong to Him, and not to mankind in general. Many people in the gospels are referred to as Christ’s disciples although some of them proved to be false. Such were the disciples who were offended at His teaching about eating His flesh and drinking His blood (see John 6:52–66). The traitor Judas not only is called a disciple but an apostle (Luke 6:13–16). Even those false followers, by virtue of being attached outwardly to the church, have been entrusted with certain of the Lord’s possessions.
Doulos, the singular of slaves, was a general term that referred to any kind and level of bondservant. It was used of common laborers and menial household servants as well as of skilled craftsmen and artists and highly-trained professionals. Their commonness was in being the personal property of their owners, who often had the power of life and death over them.
A wealthy person would often have special slaves who functioned as overseers of his household and managers of his business. In many cases some of a man’s slaves were much better educated and skilled than he was. Highly trusted slaves sometimes had a virtual free hand within proscribed areas of responsibility even when the owner was at home. When he left town for any length of time, they acted almost in his full authority, having the equivalent of what we now refer to as power of attorney They were responsible for handling all the assets and business operations of their owner for his benefit and profit.
The man in Jesus’ parable had three such trusted slaves to whom he entrusted certain of his possessions while he was away. To one he gave five talents, to another, two, and to another, one, each according to his own ability. Satisfied that his money was in capable hands, he then went on his journey.
The numbers of talents given to the slaves have no significance in themselves but simply illustrate a wide range of responsibilities, from the very high and demanding to the relatively low and easy It is significant, however, that the responsibilities were given to each according to his own ability. The owner knew his slaves intimately, and he entrusted each one only with the responsibility he reasonably could be expected to handle.
Used in a context such as this, talents always referred to money, but the word itself simply represented a measure of weight. The value of a specific coin depended on its weight and its composition. A talent of gold, for example, was extremely valuable, a talent of silver less valuable, and a talent of copper or bronze much less valuable still. But as with the number of talents given to each man, the metal content of the coins, and therefore their actual worth, is irrelevant to Jesus’ point. He was emphasizing common accountability for differing levels of responsibility based on individual ability.
Because the parable illustrates the kingdom of heaven, the man in the story obviously represents Christ Himself, and the going on a journey represents the time He is away from earth between His first and His second advents. The slaves depict professed believers, members of the Lord’s visible church whom He has entrusted with various resources to use in His behalf until He returns.
Jesus mentions only three levels of responsibility, but those are suggestive of the extremely wide range of individual abilities among people, who vary greatly in natural talent, intellect, and other capabilities. They also vary greatly in opportunity and privilege. Some church members have heard the gospel and studied Scripture since early childhood, whereas others know only the rudiments of the faith and have had little opportunity to learn more. Those who are true believers are also given spiritual gifts that vary widely from person to person (see Rom. 12:4–8; 1 Cor. 12:4–11). Some Christians are privileged to live and work closely with others of like faith and are continually encouraged and corrected by fellow believers. Other Christians, however, are the only believers in their families or even in their community or town. God knows intimately the abilities, gifts, opportunities, and circumstances of every person, and He graciously assigns responsibilities accordingly.
Even among the Twelve there were different levels of responsibility. Peter, James, and John were clearly the inner circle, and of that group Peter was the most prominent. From among the many devoted believers in the church at Jerusalem, James soon became the acknowledged leader, with commensurate responsibilities and obligations. The implication of the parable of the talents is that, even in the millennial kingdom and throughout eternity the redeemed will continue to have different levels of responsibility.
The issue of the parable pertains to what each slave does with the fairly assessed responsibility he has been given. The noblest motive in the heart of a faithful servant would be to accomplish as much as possible for the sake of his master during the master’s absence. That was also the master’s desire: not equal return from each of his slaves but relatively equal effort according to ability.
It is significant that, although the slaves with the five and the two talents did not produce equal profits, they produced equal percentages of profit, doubling what they had been given. In the same way, Christians with different capabilities and opportunities may produce differing results while working with equal faithfulness and devotion. The Lord therefore assures His servants that “each will receive his own reward according to his own labor” (1 Cor. 3:8).
The Reaction We Have
Immediately the one who had received the five talents went and traded with them, and gained five more talents. In the same manner the one who had received the two talents gained two more. But he who received the one talent went away and dug in the ground, and hid his master’s money. (25:16–18)
The slave who had received the five talents was eager to serve his master, and he therefore immediately … went and traded with them, and gained five more talents. This man represents the genuine believer whose supreme desire is to serve God, fulfilling what Jesus declared to be the first and greatest commandment, to “love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might” (Deut. 6:5; cf. Matt. 22:37).
In this context, traded carries the broad connotation of doing business over a period of time. The slave did not simply make one good investment and then sit back, but rather traded and retraded as long as his master was away. He may have been involved in a number of commercial ventures, some of them simultaneously. The point, however, is not in the particular type of work he did but in the fact that he used to full advantage all the resources his master had given him. His industry gained five more talents for his master, doubling the amount with which he had started.
In the same manner the one who had received the two talents gained two more. Although the second slave was given less than half as much to work with, he performed just as faithfully and industriously as the first. Like his fellow slave, he doubled his master’s money. Both men demonstrated supreme commitment to their master by making the most of what they had, by maximizing their opportunities.
The behavior of the third slave, however, was radically different. He who received the one talent went away and dug in the ground, and hid his master’s money. Hiding valuables in the ground was a common practice in the ancient world, where there were no bank vaults or safe deposit boxes. It was a simple and sensible way to protect such things as jewels and coins (see Matt. 13:44).
But hiding working resources in the ground was hardly a sensible way to carry on a business and earn a profit. The slave had not received the one talent to protect it but to use it wisely for his master’s profit. Although he had been given fewer resources than the other two slaves, he had the same obligation to use what he had to his maximum ability.
The Reckoning We Face
Now after a long time the master of those slaves came and settled accounts with them. And the one who had received the five talents came up and brought five more talents, saying, “Master, you entrusted five talents to me; see, I have gained five more talents.” His master said to him, “Well done, good and faithful slave; you were faithful with a few things, I will put you in charge of many things, enter into the joy of your master.” The one also who had received the two talents came up and said, “Master, you entrusted to me two talents; see, I have gained two more talents.” His master said to him, “Well done, good and faithful slave; you were faithful with a few things, I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.” And the one also who had received the one talent came up and said, “Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed. And I was afraid, and went away and hid your talent in the ground; see, you have what is yours.” But his master answered and said to him, “You wicked, lazy slave, you knew that I reap where I did not sow, and gather where I scattered no seed. Then you ought to have put my money in the bank, and on my arrival I would have received my money back with interest. (25:19–27)
The exact length of time the owner was gone is not mentioned and is irrelevant, except that it was a long time. In the context of the Olivet discourse, in which Jesus repeatedly states that His second coming will be at a time when He is not expected (see 24:36, 42, 44, 50; 25:13), the implication is that the master of those slaves came back unexpectedly.
The first order of business upon his return was to determine what the slaves had done with his assets, and he therefore sat down and settled accounts with them.
In this discourse Jesus was addressing those who would be alive at the time of His return (24:34), and the statement in the parable that the master was gone a long time (cf. 25:5) suggests that He was indirectly telling the Twelve that His coming back would not be as soon as they anticipated (see Luke 19:11). He did not tell them that it would not be in their lifetimes, because that would have tended to decrease their motivation for diligence. The idea was that, whether He would be gone for a seemingly long or seemingly short time by their human reckoning, they would have opportunity to serve Him and were obligated to be about His work.
Some years ago, certain segments of evangelicalism became preoccupied with Christ’s return, and some church members quit their jobs or sold their businesses and began watching for His appearance. One man I knew sold everything he had for about half a million dollars, some of which he used to buy thousands of New Testaments and distribute them around the world. He also bought and distributed various religious ornaments and trinkets he thought would arouse people’s interest in Christ. But soon he was bankrupt as well as frustrated and disheartened that his confidence in the Lord’s immediate return proved unfounded.
When the master called his servants together to settle the accounts, the first one reported, Master, you entrusted five talents to me; see, I have gained five more talents. The man was not boasting but simply relating the truth of the matter. There is no hint of pride or self-congratulation. He knew that everything he started with had been entrusted to him by his master, and that he had only done what he should have done. He exhibited the attitude Jesus said every obedient disciple should have: “When you do all the things which are commanded you, say, ‘We are unworthy slaves; we have done only that which we ought to have done’ ” (Luke 17:10).
Near the end of his life, Paul wrote Timothy, “I am already poured out as a drink offering, and the time of my departure has come. I have fought the good fight, I have finished the course, I have kept the faith; in the future there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will award to me on that day” (2 Tim. 4:6–8). He was not boasting but simply expressing a deep sense of fulfillment and rejoicing. He was confident the Lord knew the integrity of his heart and would be faithful to reward Him according to His gracious promises.
When the master said to him, “Well done, good and faithful slave,” he was commending the slave’s attitude more than just his accomplishment. He first of all commended the man’s excellent character, which expressed itself in excellent service.
Because the master represents the Lord Himself when He returns in glory and power to establish His kingdom, it is remarkable to contemplate that the holy, just, perfect Lord of the universe will deign to praise His true disciples for their faithfulness, imperfect as it will have been. Yet that is the glorious prospect of every child of God who, like Paul, loves Christ’s appearing (2 Tim. 4:8).
The master not only highly praised his servant but highly rewarded him, declaring, “You were faithful with a few things, I will put you in charge of many things.”
Not only will the Lord entrust greater earthly tasks to those who prove themselves faithful, but their heavenly reward will be opportunity for greater service to Him throughout eternity. Christ’s faithful servants living on earth when He returns will enter into the millennial kingdom in their same earthly bodies and will be given responsibilities commensurate with their previous faithfulness. Believers who have died or been raptured will come to earth with the Lord in their glorified bodies, and they, too, will be given rulership in proportion to their faithfulness to God while they lived on earth. Both in the millennial and the eternal manifestations of the kingdom, those who have been faithful on earth will be put … in charge of many things much greater in significance than the few things over which they previously were faithful stewards.
Of the many things heaven will be, it will not be boring. Our heavenly perfection, for example, will not be a matter simply of never making a mistake. Nor will it be always making a hole in one or a home run, as it were. Rather it will be a time of ever-expanding and increasingly joyous service, and the saints who then will serve the most and rejoice the most will be those who have served the Lord most steadfastly while on earth. Every soul in heaven will equally possess eternal life and will be equally righteous, equally Christlike, and equally glorious. Everyone will be equally perfect, because perfection has no degrees. The difference will be in opportunities and levels of service. Just as the angels serve God in ranks, so will redeemed men and women, and the degree of their heavenly service will have been determined by the devotedness of their earthly service.
Heaven will not involve differing qualities of service, because everything heavenly is perfect. Everything done for the Lord will be perfectly right and perfectly satisfying. There will be no distinctions of superiority or inferiority, and there will be no envy, jealousy, or any other remnant of sinful human nature. Whatever one’s rank or responsibility or opportunity, those will be God’s perfect will for that individual and therefore will be perfectly enjoyed. In a way that is beyond our present comprehension, believers will be both equal and unequal in the Millennium and in the eternal state.
In the parable of the pounds, the nobleman who was going into a far country to receive a kingdom gave ten of his servants one mina each to do business with until he returned. When the nobleman came back, the servant who had multiplied his mina tenfold was rewarded with authority over ten cities and the one who had multiplied his mina fivefold was given authority over five cities (Luke 19:12–19). In that parable it is even more explicit that Jesus was speaking of millennial and eternal rewards, because they are specifically bestowed after the nobleman’s kingdom was established. And as in the parable of the talents, the kingdom rewards are given in proportion to earthly faithfulness.
Jesus also mentions a second reward the master gives to the faithful slave: enter into the joy of your master. Not only will believers be rewarded in heaven with still greater opportunity for service, but they will even share the divine joy of their master. In addition to sharing the Lord’s divine sinlessness and holiness they will also share His divine joy.
Imagine the consummate ecstasy believers will have when they fully comprehend the significance of having their sins forever abolished and their righteousness forever established! It was the joyful prospect of providing that gracious redemption that motivated Christ to endure the cross and despise its shame (Heb. 12:2).
The second slave made the same report as the first, the only difference being that he had doubled two talents instead of five, and therefore gained two talents more. The master’s response to the second slave was also identical: “Well done, good and faithful slave; you were faithful with a few things, I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.”
The third slave, however, did not present the master with earnings but with an accusatory and self-serving excuse. Having done nothing with what he had been given, he said, “Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed. And I was afraid, and went away and hid your talent in the ground; see, you have what is yours.”
Like the other two, that slave was identified as belonging to the master (see v. 14), representative of his belonging to Christ’s church before the second coming. But in two distinct ways he proved that his identification with Christ was superficial and did not involve genuine faith or regeneration.
First of all, he produced absolutely nothing with the talent he had been given and did not even make an attempt to use it for his master’s benefit and profit.
As already mentioned, this slave does not represent an atheist or even an agnostic, because he recognized the master as his legitimate owner and no doubt made a pretense of honoring the master while he was away. He did not misuse his talent on immoral and selfish pursuits like the prodigal son or embezzle it like the unmerciful servant of Matthew 18. He simply disregarded the stewardship he had been given.
In much the same way, unbelieving church members live in the environment of God’s redeemed community and enjoy exposure to the teaching of His word and the fellowship of His people. But in spite of their spiritual privilege, they make no positive response to the gospel and therefore can render no fruitful service.
Second, this slave demonstrated his counterfeit allegiance by deprecating his master’s character, accusing him of a hard man, reaping where he did not sow, and gathering where he had scattered no seed. He charged his owner with unmerciful and dishonest.
That slave represents the professing Christian whose limited knowledge of God leads him to conclude that He is distant, uncaring, unjust, and undependable. Instead of judging themselves in light of God’s inerrant Word, such people judge God in the light of their own perverted perceptions. They not only justify themselves but do so at God’s expense.
His erroneous estimation of his master’s character was sufficient proof that this slave had no intimate or reliable knowledge of him. That slave portrays the unregenerate church member who has no spiritual fruit in his life and no spiritual worship in his heart. He is blind to the Lord’s kindness, grace, compassion, mercy, honor, majesty, and glory because he has never surrendered himself to the Lord’s sovereignty and grace.
Everything about that man contradicted his professed commitment to his master. In a certain way he was afraid of his master, but it was not the fear of reverential awe but of irreverent contempt. As his own words testified, he resented and despised the master and had no love or respect for him at all. His relationship to the master was one of enmity rather than peace, of hatred rather than love, of rejection rather than faith.
This slave represents a professed Christian whose view of God is corrupt because his unredeemed heart is still corrupt. He views God through the lens of his own depraved convictions.
In response to the unfaithful slave’s rationalization, the master said, “You wicked, lazy slave, you knew that I reap where I did not sow, and gather where I scattered no seed. Then you ought to have put my money in the bank, and on my arrival I would have received my money back with interest.”
The slave was wicked in that he unjustly besmirched the character of his master, and he was lazy in that he did nothing with the talent entrusted to him. By repeating the slave’s charge against him, the master did not acknowledge its truthfulness. He rather said, in effect: “You think I am a hard man, do you, harvesting crops that do not belong to me? If you really thought that, why did you not take the talent and put it in the bank, where it could at least draw interest?”
The ancient Roman Empire had a banking system that was in many respects like those of modern times. The maximum loan rate was 12 percent simple interest, and the interest earned on deposits was probably about half that rate. The slave with the one talent therefore could have reaped at least a 6 percent return by making virtually no effort at all. The fact that he did not attempt even to earn simple interest on the money confirmed his total irresponsibility and his indifference to the master.
Even if the slave’s accusation against his owner had been valid, it would not have excused his indolence. If anything, it would have made it more foolhardy. “If you thought I demand a return even on that which does not belong to me,” the master countered, in effect, “did you think I would not require a return on that which does belong to me?” The slave was verbally hanged with his own rope.
The truth of the matter was that the slave had no real concern for his master one way or the other, and his excuse seems to have been more spur of the moment than planned. He did not expect the master’s return and did not expect to be held accountable, and when he was caught by surprise he simply threw out an outrageous charge that made no sense.
The distinguishing mark of the first two servants was that they used their opportunity to serve the Lord before His return, which they eagerly awaited, and thereby proved the genuineness of their salvation. They were willing to invest everything they had in the service of their Master. The third servant, on the other hand, put aside what God had given him and went about his own selfish business. He called himself a servant of God but demonstrated conclusively he was not.
The master was angry with the third slave not simply because he lost a profit but because the slave wasted his opportunity. Jesus’ point was that having little to work with is no excuse for not using it at all. Even a person with limited exposure to Scripture and who possesses few talents and has few opportunities for service is fully obligated to use those blessings in God’s service.
In T. S. Eliot’s play Murder in the Cathedral, the chorus chants, “Yet we have gone on living, living and partly living” Those words are reminiscent of the three slaves in this parable. Two of them were truly alive, whereas the other had only the appearance of life. Two of them built their houses on a foundation of rock, the other built his on sand. Two of them were wheat, the other was a tare.
The profit earned by the first two servants represents the accomplishment and satisfaction of a life that belongs to the Lord and is faithfully dedicated to His service. The failure of the third servant to use that with which he had been entrusted by his master represents the emptiness, uselessness, and worthlessness of a life in which profession of faith in Christ is proved false and meaningless by the careless waste of privilege and opportunity.
The Reward We Gain
Therefore take away the talent from him, and give it to the one who has the ten talents. “For to everyone who has shall more be given, and he shall have an abundance; but from the one who does not have, even what he does have shall be taken away. And cast out the worthless slave into the outer darkness; in that place there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. (25:28–30)
Jesus made clear that the visible church will always include both genuine and spurious Christians. Every church has tares that, except to God, are indistinguishable from the wheat. Their true character cannot be determined by what they do outwardly, because unbelievers can be quite active in the church and seemingly interested in its work. As far as the Lord is concerned, however, the work they do is not in His service or for the benefit of His kingdom. Whatever such a person may do with the abilities he has from the Lord, they are spiritually unproductive and might as well be hidden away. In the kingdom of God, the realm of His sovereign rule-whether in the visible earthly church or in the millennial kingdom-there will be no acceptable service offered to Him except that offered by true believers.
Therefore when Christ returns, He will figuratively take away the talent from him, and give it to the one who has the ten talents. As He had declared on at least one previous occasion (see Matt. 13:12), Jesus now said again: “To everyone who has shall more be given, and he shall have an abundance; but the one who does not have, even what he does have shall be taken away.”
Those who demonstrate by their spiritual fruitfulness that they belong to God will be given even greater opportunity to bear fruit for Him. But those who demonstrate by their unproductiveness that they do not belong to God will lose even the benefits the once had. Such a person does not have any true blessings from God because he has made them worthless through disuse. But the reality of what those blessings could have been will be given to someone who has proved his genuineness. The divine principle is that those who trust in Christ will gain everything, and those who do not trust in Him will lose everything.
The third slave was not simply unfaithful but faithless. A true Christian who wastes his abilities, spiritual gifts, and opportunities will have his work “burned up, [and] he shall suffer loss; but he himself shall be saved, yet so as through fire” (1 Cor. 3:15). The person represented by this slave, however, has no faith at all and therefore no saving relationship to God. No matter how much he may appear to have been blessed by God and to have served Him, one day he will hear from the Lord’s own lips the devastating words, “l never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness” (Matt. 7:23).
The third slave was utterly worthless, and his fate was to be cast out … into the outer darkness; in that place there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Just like the man who tried to crash the king’s wedding feast without the proper garment (Matt. 22:11–13), this unproductive, counterfeit servant was destined for destruction.
Outer darkness is a common New Testament description of hell. “God is light,” John declared, “and in Him there is no darkness at all” (1 John 1:5). Light signifies God’s presence, and darkness signifies his absence. Hell not only is eternal darkness but eternal torment. In that place there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, signifying the unrelieved agony of separated from God’s presence and goodness.

Profitable and unprofitable servants (vv. 14–30). This parable must not be confused with the Parable of the Pounds (Luke 19:11–27) though the two parables do have similarities. Please note that each servant in this parable was given money (a talent was worth about twenty years’ wages) according to his ability. The man with much ability was given five talents; the man with average ability received two talents; the man with minimal ability received one talent.
The talents represent opportunities to use our abilities. If five talents were given to a person with minimal ability, he would be destroyed by the heavy responsibility. But if only one talent were given to a man of great ability, he would be disgraced and degraded. God assigns work and opportunity according to ability. We are living in the period of time between Matthew 25:18 and 19. We have been assigned our ministries according to the abilities and gifts God has given us. It is our privilege to serve the Lord and multiply His goods.
The three servants fell into two categories: faithful and unfaithful. The faithful servants took their talents and put them to work for their Lord. The unfaithful servant hid his talent in the earth. Instead of using his opportunities, he buried them! He did not purposely do evil. But by doing nothing, he was committing sin and robbing his Lord of service and increase.
The two men who put their money to work each received the same commendation (Matt. 25:21, 23). It was not the portion but the proportion that made the difference. They started as servants, but their Lord promoted them to rulers. They were faithful with a few things, so the Lord trusted them with many things. They had worked and toiled, and now they entered into joy. Their faithfulness gave each of them a capacity for greater service and responsibility.
The third servant was unfaithful and therefore was unrewarded. Because this man was afraid he might fail, he never tried to succeed. He feared life and his responsibilities. This paralyzed him with anxiety, so he buried the talent to protect it. The least he could have done was put the money in a bank and collect some interest. There was no real risk in that.
What we do not use for the Lord, we are in danger of losing. The master reprimanded the unfaithful, unprofitable servant, and then took his talent from him. The man with the most talents received the extra talent.
Some feel that this unprofitable servant was not a true believer. But it seems that he was a true servant, even though he proved to be unprofitable. The “outer darkness” of Matthew 25:30 need not refer to hell, even though that is often the case in the Gospels (Matt. 8:12; 22:13). It is dangerous to build theology on parables, for parables illustrate truth in vivid ways. The man was dealt with by the Lord, he lost his opportunity for service, and he gained no praise or reward. To me, that is outer darkness.
It is possible that the one-talent man thought that his one talent was not really very important. He did not have five talents, or even two. Why worry about one? Because he was appointed as a steward by the Lord. Were it not for the one-talent people in our world, very little would get accomplished. His one talent could have increased to two and brought glory to his master.
These three parables encourage us to love His appearing, look for His appearing, and labor faithfully until He comes. We should be watching, witnessing, and working. We may not be successful in the eyes of men, or even popular with others. But if we are faithful and profitable, we shall receive our reward.3

(6). The Parable of the Talents. 25:14–30
14–23. The Parable of the Talents further emphasizes the need for personal preparation and faithful service to the Master (see also Lk 19:11–28). The talents represent monetary values and are distributed according to ability (vs. 15). Far country indicating the time between Jesus’ first coming and His final return during which He is in heaven. The three servants are typical of three types who are entrusted various tasks in accordance with their own ability. Not all are expected to produce the same results, but all are to be faithful with what they have had entrusted to them. Thus, the first two double their money, while the last one hides the one … in the earth. The phrase After a long time gives a veiled indication of the length of Christ’s departure to heaven during the present age. Each of those producing results is commended by the Master: Well done … good and faithful servant and is promised to be a ruler over many things, with a view to continued service in the millennial kingdom.
24–25. The great mistake of the unfaithful servant was in misjudging the character of his Master: thou art a hard man. He could not have known the Master well to assume him to be severe and merciless. Atkinson (p. 801) observes, “The slave seems to have thought that whatever he did his master would be unjust to him.” He failed to understand the real generosity of his Master who wanted him to experience the joys of service. Whereas the Parable of the Ten Virgins emphasized personal preparation for the coming of Christ, the Parable of the Talents stresses the importance of faithful service during His present absence.
26–30. The fact that the latter man is called wicked and slothful and an unprofitable servant (vs. 30) who is cast out into outer darkness, certainly indicates that he was not a true disciple of the Master. The idea of this illustrative parable is that all true believers will produce results (elsewhere, “fruits”) in varying degrees. Those who produce no results are not truly converted. Those who deny soul-winning, personal evangelism, and church growth will find no comfort in this story. Those who hide their treasure (probably, the life-changing message of the gospel), because of a harsh view of the Master’s sovereignty over them, reveal that they do not really love people and, therefore, their own salvation is questionable!4

115
THE PARABLE OF THE TALENTS
Matthew 25:14–30

Right after the parable of the wise and foolish virgins, by which Jesus instructed His disciples to be prepared for His coming, He told them the parable of the talents to teach them to be diligent as they waited for Him. As we have seen time and time again in the Olivet Discourse, this same lesson applies to us, Jesus’ disciples in the twenty-first century. Sadly, the basic principles found in this parable fly in the face of everything we hear in contemporary culture. If ever Jesus told a parable that is politically incorrect in contemporary America, it is this one. We need to close our ears to the siren voices of the pagan culture in which we live, and listen carefully to the teaching of our Lord and Savior.
According to Matthew, Jesus told His disciples: “For the kingdom of heaven is like a man traveling to a far country, who called his own servants and delivered his goods to them. And to one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one, to each according to his own ability; and immediately he went on a journey. Then he who had received the five talents went and traded with them, and made another five talents. And likewise he who had received two gained two more also. But he who had received one went and dug in the ground, and hid his lord’s money” (vv. 14–18).
Jesus told a story about a wealthy man who went away for a long journey, and before he went he entrusted some of his riches to three of his servants, giving each of them “talents.” These talents were not abilities but units of weight. In the ancient world, a talent could be a unit of gold, silver, or bronze. Jesus did not say which kind of precious metal the master entrusted to his servants, but a talent of gold or silver was quite valuable.
The master gave five talents to one servant, two talents to another, and one to a third. He distributed these talents according to his estimation of the ability of each servant to handle them. This is why he did not distribute them equally. Then, after the master’s departure, the man to whom the master gave five talents doubled that number. Likewise, the man to whom the master gave two talents also produced a hundred percent increase. The third servant, however, was concerned that he might lose the one talent he had been given and land in serious trouble with his master, so he played it safe and buried his master’s gold or silver in the ground.
Stewardship Capitalism
On the surface, the interpretation of this parable is about as simple as it gets. It focuses on the productivity of the Lord’s people, on fruitfulness. That is, Jesus was telling the disciples to engage in productive activity until His return.
What we find initially in this rather simple parable is a lesson about stewardship. A steward was a servant in the ancient world who was given authority to make sure everything functioned properly in the master’s household. The Greek word that is translated as “stewardship” in the New Testament is oikonomia; we get the English word economy from it. The word oikonomia is a combination of two other words: oikos, which means “house,” and nomos, which means “law.” So, stewardship has to do with the law of the house or the rule of the house—how matters in the house are handled.
However, I think this parable points beyond stewardship to something else. It will be politically incorrect for me to write this, but I believe Jesus was speaking here not just about stewardship but about a particular kind of stewardship, which I call “stewardship capitalism.” The term capitalism has become a dirty word in Western culture. Of course, capitalism can take all kinds of shapes and faces, and at times it can be ruthless and greedy. But the Bible presents a picture of stewardship capitalism and gives basic principles that are extremely important.
The first of these principles is that we possess nothing. Everything we think we own is really God’s, for He owns everything, and all that we have we hold as stewards for Him. Second, God gives us capital not to waste, to horde, or to bury in the ground, but to be productive. If we put our capital to work, it can earn while we sleep. Third, stewardship capitalism includes the principle of delayed gratification. When we receive our paychecks, we do not spend everything we have earned to gratify every desire we have. Instead, we put the brakes on our consumption and invest a portion of what we take home for the future.
I saw the benefits of delayed gratification as I was growing up in Pittsburgh, the largest steel manufacturing city in the world. Pittsburgh and all the towns around it were marked by the billowing smoke from the steel mills of Western Pennsylvania. Sadly, on Friday afternoons, when the whistles would blow at the mills, the men would go to the paymaster’s office and get their money, and then most of them would head to the nearest bars. Only about one out of ten would go home and give his wife his pay so she could deposit it in the bank. Guess which of those workers sent their sons to college? The sons of those men who delayed their gratification and invested in the futures of their children became doctors, lawyers, and engineers.
The Bible is also very concerned about the material well-being of human beings. It is not a Gnostic book that is concerned only with our souls. Our Lord Jesus was profoundly concerned that people should have enough to eat, that they should not be naked, that they should have homes. All of these things cost money. My father-in-law used to say he would rather clothe me than feed me. He said I was eating him out of house and home when I came around to date his daughter. But God is concerned about all human needs.
So, what is the single most important factor for the material well-being of people? The answer to that question is simple—production. Unless food is produced, people starve. Unless clothing is produced, people freeze. Unless houses are built, people are without shelter. So, the most important factor in improving the welfare of human beings is to increase productivity. On an individual basis, it is extremely important that we be productive.
What is the most important factor for increasing productivity? The answer is very simple: tools. Let me give you a simple example. You probably have a lawn outside your home. Having that lawn requires you to balance three factors—labor, time, and money. Your grass needs to be cut. What is the cheapest way to cut it? You could go out, kneel down, and start chewing off each blade of grass one at a time. You probably would never get it done. It would be extremely labor-intensive. However, it would be cheap—so long as you did not need to spend time doing something else to earn money. You can increase your productivity by using a pair of scissors instead of our teeth. It would be a little more expensive to use scissors rather than your teeth, and it still would be labor-intensive, but it would be a little bit more efficient. You can increase your productivity even more by buying a push mower. That would save time, but it would cost more money. If you want to save more time and labor, you can buy a power mower. It will cost you more money, but it will certainly save you time and labor because you will have a better tool. The better the tools, the more productive you can be.
In 1989, right after the fall of Nicolae Ceausescu, I had the privilege of visiting Romania. As we traveled across the landscape by train, I could see thousands of babushkas, “grandmothers,” wearing black dresses down to their ankles, out in the fields with wooden hoes and wooden rakes, loading their produce on ox-drawn or donkey-drawn carts. It was very primitive and unproductive agriculture. Why could the Romanian farmers not produce as much as American farmers? Was it because the Romanian men were not as strong physically as American men? No. Was it because they were not as smart? No. Was it because they did not have specific knowledge of agriculture? No, all the best methods for growing things was available in their language. The one thing the Romanian farmers did not have that American farmers had was tools. They did not have tractors and mechanical harvesters. That was the reason American farmers could produce a thousand times more in a month than Romanian farmers. It all came down to tools.
What is the single most important factor for acquiring tools? The answer is a really unpopular word—profit. In order to buy tools, you must have surplus capital. If you do not have the surplus capital, you must use wooden hoes and rakes. Profit is simply what is left over from your revenue after you pay your expenses. Somehow we have come to hate the idea of profit. But if you do not have profit, you will not have tools. And if you do not have tools, you will not have production. And if you do not have production, you will not have a shirt on your back, a loaf of bread to eat, or a house to live in.
So, Jesus wants His people to be productive with the things God has given to them. In other words, He wants us to use those things fruitfully, so that they increase.
Good Servants and a Lazy Servant
Jesus then related what happened when the master returned: “After a long time the lord of those servants came and settled accounts with them. So he who had received five talents came and brought five other talents, saying, ‘Lord, you delivered to me five talents; look, I have gained five more talents besides them.’ His lord said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant; you were faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord.’ He also who had received two talents came and said, ‘Lord, you delivered to me two talents; look, I have gained two more talents besides them.’ His lord said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant; you have been faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord’ ” (vv. 19–23). When the master learned how productive the first two servants had been, he said: “Well done. You’re a good servant, a faithful servant. Since you’ve been faithful in little, I’m going to make you responsible for more and more things.” He gave the same message to the man who doubled the two talents. He was given fewer talents, but he was just as productive with them.
What of the third servant, the man who was given one talent? Jesus said: “Then he who had received the one talent came and said, ‘Lord, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you have not sown, and gathering where you have not scattered seed. And I was afraid, and went and hid your talent in the ground. Look, there you have what is yours’ ” (vv. 24–25). This man came not with a report of productivity but with excuses. He said: “Lord, I knew you were a hard man. You’re the kind of man who reaps where you haven’t sown.” What kind of man was the servant talking about? He was describing a capitalist, one who buys a field and hires other people to sow the seed and reap the harvest. They get a salary but the master gets the largest portion of the profit because his capital was working for him.
That excuse did not curry the master’s favor. Jesus told His disciples: “But his lord answered and said to him, ‘You wicked and lazy servant, you knew that I reap where I have not sown, and gather where I have not scattered seed. So you ought to have deposited my money with the bankers, and at my coming I would have received back my own with interest. Therefore take the talent from him, an5

6


*
1 Morris, L. (1992). The Gospel according to Matthew (pp. 626–632). Grand Rapids, MI; Leicester, England: W.B. Eerdmans; Inter-Varsity Press.
2 Augsburger, M. S., & Ogilvie, L. J. (1982). Matthew (Vol. 24, p. 18). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Inc.
3 Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, p. 92). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
4 Hindson, E. E., & Kroll, W. M. (Eds.). (1994). KJV Bible Commentary (pp. 1950–1951). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
5 Sproul, R. C. (2013). Matthew (pp. 723–728). Wheaton, IL: Crossway.

6 MacArthur, J. F., Jr. (1985). Matthew (Mt 25:13–28). Chicago: Moody Press.