Wednesday, February 6, 2019

EAT SOLID FOOD


7
Carnal Christians (3:1–9)
And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual men, but as to men of flesh, as to babes in Christ. I gave you milk to drink, not solid food; for you were not yet able to receive it. Indeed, even now you are not yet able, for you are still fleshly. For since there is jealousy and strife among you, are you not fleshly, and are you not walking like mere men? For when one says, “I am of Paul,” and another, “I am of Apollos,” are you not mere men? What then is Apollos? And what is Paul? Servants through whom you believed, even as the Lord gave opportunity to each one. I planted, Apollos watered, but God was causing the growth. So then neither the one who plants nor the one who waters is anything, but God who causes the growth. Now he who plants and he who waters are one; but each will receive his own reward according to his own labor. For we are God’s fellow workers; you are God’s field, God’s building. (3:1–9)
In his book The New Life Michael Green reports that a friend of his came to him and explained his new-found Christian life in words something like these: “It is rather like a cyclist who, when he is climbing a long hill, thinks he will be able to freewheel down the other side. It is not until he reaches the top that he sees that his task has only just started and that the road winds on with even steeper hills than the one he has just climbed.”
Many Christians have come to the same conclusion. Faithful Christian living becomes increasingly more difficult and more demanding. It is the furthest thing from a downhill ride. Christ does solve all of our important problems. He does bring peace, joy, meaning, purpose, and many other blessings of which the unbeliever knows nothing. But the Christian life is not easy. In many ways living is far more demanding than before we were saved.
How is this so? How—when we have God’s own Spirit within us, the mind of Christ, and the power of God—could it become more difficult to do what is right, to do what our Lord wants us to do? There are two reasons: the world and the flesh. The first is outside us, the second is inside us. They are Satan’s supreme instruments in tempting believers and keeping them from faithfulness and victory.
The promise of the New Covenant in Christ is the promise of a new spirit and a new heart (Ezek. 36:25–27). When a person becomes a Christian he also becomes a new creation, with a new nature, a new inner being, and a favorable disposition toward God—none of which a person can have apart from Christ (2 Pet. 1:4; 2 Cor. 5:17). From that point, until the Lord takes him to be with Himself, he is swimming upstream. Like a salmon returning to spawn, he discovers that gravity and the current are continually against him. His new heart drives him in an entirely different direction from that of the world around him.
The church has often thought of worldliness only in terms of dancing, alcoholic drinking, and the like. But worldliness is much deeper than bad habits; it is an orientation, a way of thinking and believing. Basically it is buying the world’s philosophies, buying human wisdom. It is looking to the world—to human leaders, to influential and popular people, to neighbors, associates, and fellow students—for our standards, attitudes, and meaning. Worldliness is accepting the world’s definitions, the world’s measuring sticks, the world’s goals.
The second great obstacle Christians face is the flesh. In fact, it is the flesh that produces the bridge the world uses to reach us. When we are given Christ’s divine nature, our flesh is not removed. That will not occur until we are glorified (Rom. 8:18–25). Until then the flesh continually resists and opposes the new heart. Paul tells about the struggle in his own life:
For that which I am doing, I do not understand; for I am not practicing what I would like to do, but I am doing the very thing I hate.… For the good that I wish, I do not do; but I practice the very evil that I do not wish.… For I joyfully concur with the law of God in the inner man, but I see a different law in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind. (Rom. 7:15, 19, 22–23)
When we were born physically we inherited from Adam the flesh with its propensity to sin. When we were born spiritually and given a new spirit, a new heart, God broke the back of sin, crippled its ability, and paid its penalty. But the tendency to evil remains. The one word that best characterizes the flesh, our humanness, our Adamic nature, is selfish. The sin of Adam, like the sin of the tempter when he fell (Isa. 14:13), centered on setting his own will and interests against God’s; and that has been the center of sin ever since.
The world and the flesh are closely related. They are used by the same power, Satan, and they serve the same purpose, evil. They complement each other and are often hard to distinguish. But it is not necessary to precisely distinguish between them, because both of them are spiritual enemies, and both must be fought with the same weapons—God’s Word and God’s Spirit.
Our ultimate triumph over the world and the flesh is certain, but our continued struggle with them in this life is also certain. We will win the ultimate battle, but can lose a lot of skirmishes along the way.
The Corinthian believers had an especially hard struggle against those twin enemies, a struggle which they seldom won. They would not break with the world or break with the flesh and were continually succumbing to both. Consequently they fell into one serious sin after another. Almost all of this epistle has to do with identifying and correcting those sins.
The sin of division was closely related to numerous other sins. Sins are always interrelated. There is no such thing as an isolated sin. One sin leads to another, and the second reinforces the first. Every sin is a combination of sins, and a sinning believer cannot confine the evil to one dimension.
From 1:18 through 2:16 Paul points out that the Corinthians were divided because of worldliness, because of their continued love for human wisdom. In 3:1–9 the apostle shows them that they also were divided because of the flesh, because of their continued yielding to the evil in their humanness. He shows the cause, the symptoms, and the cure.
The Cause of Division: the Flesh
And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual men, but as to men of flesh, as to babes in Christ. I gave you milk to drink, not solid food; for you were not yet able to receive it. Indeed, even now you are not yet able, for you are still fleshly. (3:1–3a)
The cause of division in the church was more than an external, worldly influence. It was also internal, fleshly. The Corinthians had succumbed to the pressures of the world, but they were also succumbing to the pressures and enticements of their own flesh.
Before Paul chastises them for their immature sinfulness, he reminds them again that he is speaking to them as brethren, as fellow believers. That is a term of recognition and of love. It reminded his brothers in Christ that they were still saved, that their sinning, terrible and inexcusable as it was, did not forfeit their salvation. He did not try to diminish the seriousness of their sins, but he did try to diminish or prevent any discouragement that his rebuke might otherwise have caused. He stood with them as a brother, not over them as a judge.
But Paul could not speak to the Corinthian believers as spiritual men. They had come through the door of faith but had gone no farther. Most of them had received Jesus Christ years earlier but were acting as if they had just been born again. They were still babes in Christ.
The New Testament uses the word spiritual in a number of ways. In a neutral sense it simply means the realm of spiritual things, in contrast to the realm of the physical. When applied to men, however, it is used of their relationship to God in one of two ways: positionally or practically. Unbelievers are totally unspiritual in both senses. They possess neither a new spirit nor the Holy Spirit. Their position is natural and their practice is natural. Believers, on the other hand, are totally spiritual in the positional sense, because they have been given a new inner being that loves God and is indwelt by His Holy Spirit. But practically, believers can also be unspiritual.
In 2:14–15 Paul contrasts believers and unbelievers, and his use of “spiritual” in that context refers, therefore, to positional spirituality. The “natural man” (v. 14) is the unsaved; “he who is spiritual” (v. 15) is the saved. In the positional sense, there is no such thing as an unspiritual Christian or a partially spiritual Christian. In this sense every believer is equal. This spiritual is a synonym for possessing the life of God in the soul, or as we saw in 2:16, having the mind of Christ.
A positionally spiritual person is one with a new heart, indwelt by and controlled by the Holy Spirit. “You are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. But if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Him” (Rom. 8:9; cf. v. 14). When we trust in Jesus Christ, His Spirit takes charge of our lives and remains in charge until we die. He will control us to His own ultimate ends, whether we submit or not. “We know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose” (Rom. 8:28). Our resistance and disobedience can cause many unnecessary detours, delays, and heartaches, but He will accomplish His work in us. “He who began a good work in you will perfect it until the day of Christ Jesus” (Phil. 1:6).
Practically, however, believers may be anything but spiritual. Such were the Corinthian Christians. Paul addressed them as brethren, but he made it clear that he had to speak to them on the lowest possible spiritual level. He had to speak to them as if they were men of flesh.
Men of flesh (sarkinos) is literally “fleshy ones.” In this context it refers to man’s fallen humanness, his Adamic self—his bodily desires that manifest rebelliousness toward God, his glorying in himself, and his proneness to sin. As mentioned above, the flesh is not eradicated when we are saved. It no longer can ultimately dominate or destroy us, but it can still greatly influence us. That is why we yearn for the redemption of the body (Rom. 8:23). Glorification, in one sense, will be less of a change than justification. Justification was transformation of the inner being; glorification is the elimination of the outer being, which bears the curse.
So a Christian is not characterized by sin; it no longer represents his basic nature. But he is still able to sin, and his sin is just as sinful as the sin of an unbeliever. Sin is sin. When a Christian sins, he is being practically unspiritual, living on the same practical level as an unbeliever. Consequently Paul is compelled to speak to the Corinthian believers much as if they were unbelievers.
Perhaps somewhat to soften the rebuke, he also compares them to babes in Christ. It was far from a compliment, but it did recognize that they truly belonged to Christ.
The Corinthian believers were spiritually ignorant. Paul had ministered to them for eighteen months, and after that they were pastored by the highly-gifted Apollos. Some of them were acquainted with Peter and others apparently had even heard Jesus preach (1:12). Like the “babes” of Hebrews 5:13, they had no excuse for not being mature. Yet they were exactly the opposite. They were not babes because they were newly redeemed, but because they were inexcusably immature.
The Corinthians were not unintelligent. Their problem was not low iq or lack of teaching. They were not ignorant of the faith because they were dumb, but because they were fleshly. The cause was not mental but spiritual. Because they refused to give up their worldly ways and their carnal desires, they became what James calls forgetful hearers (James 1:25). A person who does not use information will lose it; and spiritual truth is no exception. Spiritual truths that we ignore and neglect will become less and less remembered and meaningful (cf. 2 Pet. 1:12–13). Nothing causes us to ignore God’s truth more than not living it. A sinning Christian is uncomfortable in the light of God’s truth. He either turns from his fleshly behavior or he begins to block out God’s light. Only when we put aside “malice and all guile and hypocrisy and envy and all slander”—that is, the flesh—are we able to “long for the pure milk of the word” and “grow in respect to salvation” (1 Pet. 2:1–2).
I gave you milk to drink, not solid food; for you were not yet able to receive it. Indeed, even now you are not yet able, for you are still fleshly. (3:2–3a)
When Paul first preached to the Corinthians he taught the more easily digestible elementary truths of doctrine, the milk. But now, some five years later, they still needed to be fed milk. They could not yet spiritually digest solid food.
Like many Christians today, the Corinthians seemed quite content to stay on milk. Some congregations do not want the pastor to get “too deep.” Their fleshly habits are not much threatened if, for instance, the preacher sticks primarily to evangelistic messages. Evangelism is the cutting edge of the church’s mission, but it is for unbelievers, not believers. Or the congregation wants Scripture to be preached so superficially that their sin is not exposed, much less rebuked and corrected.
There is no difference at all between the truths of a spiritual milk diet and a spiritual solid food diet, except in detail and depth. All doctrine may have both milk and meat elements. It is not that we are to be continually learning new doctrines in order to grow, but that we are to be learning more about the doctrines we have known for years. A new Christian might explain the atonement, for example, as, “Christ died for my sins.” A long-time student of the Word, on the other hand, would go into such things as regeneration, justification, substitution, and propitiation. One explanation would not be truer than the other; but the first would be milk and the second, solid food.
For a Christian preacher or teacher to give only milk week after week, year after year, is a crime against the Word of God and the Holy Spirit! It cannot be done without neglecting much of the Word and without neglecting the leading and empowering of the Holy Spirit, the supreme Teacher and Illuminator. It is also a terrible disservice to those who hear, whether or not they are satisfied with having only milk. The appetite must be created.
Nothing is more precious or wonderful than a little baby. But a twenty-year-old with the mind of an infant is heartbreaking. A baby who acts like a baby is a joy; but an adult who acts like a baby is a tragedy. It doubtlessly grieved the Holy Spirit, as it grieved Paul, that the Christians in Corinth had never gotten out of their spiritual infancy. This tragedy is immensely worse than that of the physically or mentally retarded, who have no responsibility for their conditions. Spiritual retardation, however, is always primarily our own doing. We may not have the best human preacher or teacher, but every believer has the perfect Teacher within, who longs to instruct him in the things of God (cf. 1 John 2:20, 27). If we do not grow spiritually, the reason is always that we are still fleshly.
The believer’s growth times are those times when he walks in the Spirit (Gal. 5:16–17). It is essential to understand that carnality is not an absolute state in which a believer exists (Rom. 8:4–14), but a behavior pattern he chooses one moment at a time. To say it another way, a Christian is not fleshly in the sense of being, but in the sense of behaving.
The Symptoms of Division: Jealousy and Strife
For since there is jealousy and strife among you, are you not fleshly, and are you not walking like mere men? For when one says, “I am of Paul,” and another, “I am of Apollos,” are you not mere men? (3:3b–4)
Immature, fleshly Christians are never the result of deficient spiritual genes or of a spiritual birth defect. They are the way they are by their own choices. One of the worst and most disappointing problems the church can have is a congregation full of babes, Christians who are not growing because they seek to fulfill fleshly appetites.
Because self-centeredness is at the heart of fleshly behavior, jealousy and strife are always found in an immature congregation. Jealousy is the attitude, and strife is the action that results from it. One is the inner emotional condition, the other the outward expression of selfishness.
Those two problems, however, are merely representative of the many symptoms of the flesh. Sinful desire is like cancer; it has many forms and affects many parts of the church in many ways—all of them destructive. Carnality is a general evil that has many manifestations. It will corrupt morals, weaken personal relationships, produce doubt about God and His Word, destroy prayer life, and provide fertile ground for heresy. It will attack right doctrine and right living, right belief and right practice.
Jealousy and strife are not the least of the symptoms of fleshly living. Those sins are more destructive than many Christians seem to think. They are far from being petty sins, because, among other things, they cause division in the church, Christ’s body, for whom He gave His life. They are among the surest marks of fallen humanness, just as unity is one of the surest marks of divine transformation.
Jealousy is a severe form of selfishness, begrudging someone else what we wish were ours. And selfishness is one of the most obvious characteristics of babyhood. An infant’s life is almost totally self-centered and selfish. Its whole concern is with its own comfort, hunger, attention, sleep. It is typical of a young child to be self-centered, but it should not be typical of an adult, especially a Christian adult. It is spiritually infantile to be jealous of and to cause strife among fellow believers, and it betrays a fleshly perspective.
Division can only occur where there is selfishness. Fleshly, immature people cooperate only with those leaders and fellow believers with whom they happen to agree or who personally appeal to them or will flatter them. Factions cannot help resulting where there is jealousy and strife, or any other form of carnality. When a congregation develops loyalties around individuals, it is a sure symptom of spiritual immaturity and trouble. It was sinful for factions to develop around Paul and Apollos, and it is sinful for divisive factions to develop around any leader in the church today. Are you not walking like mere men? is another way of saying, “You are thinking and behaving in a fleshly way.”
The Cure for Divisions: Glorifying God
What then is Apollos? And what is Paul? Servants through whom you believed, even as the Lord gave opportunity to each one. I planted, Apollos watered, but God was causing the growth. So then neither the one who plants nor the one who waters is anything, but God who causes the growth. Now he who plants and he who waters are one; but each will receive his own reward according to his own labor. For we are God’s fellow workers; you are God’s field, God’s building. (3:5–9)
The cure for division is turning away from self and setting our eyes on the one God whom we all glorify. When our attention is focused on our Lord, as it always should be, there will be no time and no occasion for division. When our attention is on Him it cannot be on ourselves or on human leaders or human factions.
Apollos and Paul were simply the servants through whom you believed. They were the instruments, not the source, of salvation. As Paul had reminded them earlier, he had not died for them and they were not baptized in his name (1:13). The same was true, of course, for Apollos and Peter, as it is true for all other ministers of the Lord of all time. All Christians, including even such men as those, whom the Lord used so mightily, are but His servants (diakonoi), or ministers (KJV). It is not the same word (doulos) often translated “servant, slave, or bond-servant” (7:21–23; Rom. 1:1; etc.), but simply meant a menial worker of any sort, free or slave. It was often used of a table waiter or what we would now call a busboy.
Paul was saying in effect, “No one builds a movement around a waiter or busboy, or erects monuments to them. Apollos and I are just waiters or busboys whom the Lord used as servants to bring you food. You do not please us by trying to honor us. Your honor, your glory, is misplaced. You are acting like the world, like mere men. Build your monuments, give your praise to the One who prepared the spiritual food we delivered.”
The world honors and tries to immortalize great men because men are the highest thing it knows. The world cannot see beyond itself. But Christians know God—the Creator, the Sustainer, the Savior, the Lord of the universe, and the Source of all things. He alone is worthy of honor. We are but His servants, His instruments. If an artist is to be honored, you do not make a statue of his brush or his palette. It makes no more sense for Christians to glorify men, even a Paul or an Apollos, who are only brushes or palettes in the Master’s hands. Such are to be esteemed and loved for their work (1 Thess. 5:12–13), but not revered or set against each other.
Those men had their God-appointed work to do. Using agricultural metaphors, Paul acknowledged that he had planted and that Apollos watered. They had done their work well and faithfully. But the real work was the Lord’s. God was causing the growth. No man, not even the best farmer or the best horticulturist, can give physical life or growth to a plant. How much less can anyone, even an apostle, give spiritual life or growth to a person. The most that men can do in either case is to prepare and water the soil and to plant the seeds. The rest is up to God. Neither the one who plants nor the one who waters is anything, but God who causes the growth. The human instrument is not anything but a tool. All the honor for the accomplishment goes to God.
Paul here mentions only two types of ministry, represented by planting and watering. His principle, however, applies to every type of ministry. In our eyes, some Christian work is more glamorous, or seems more important or more significant than other work. But if God has called a person to a work, that is the most important ministry he can have. All of God’s work is important. To glorify one kind of Christian work above another is just as carnal and divisive as to glorify one leader above another.
Our Lord’s parable in Matthew 20:1–16 demonstrates the equality of our ministries in the day of rewards. Jesus gave the parable as a corrective to the disciples’ feeling that they were more worthy than others (19:27–30). We will all equally inherit the promised eternal life, with all its blessings. That is the sameness of future glory.
He who plants and he who waters are one. All of God’s workers are one in Him, and to Him all glory should go. Recognition of our oneness in the Lord is the sure and only remedy for divisiveness. It leaves no place for the flesh and its jealousy, strife, and division.
God does not fail to recognize the faithful work of His servants. Each will receive his own reward according to his own labor. God will “give their reward to [His] bond-servants the prophets and to the saints and to those who fear [His] name, the small and the great” (Rev. 11:18). That is the uniqueness of future glory.
God rewards on the basis of labor, not success or results. A missionary may work faithfully for 40 years and see only a handful of converts. Another may work far fewer years and see far more converts. Jeremiah was one of God’s most faithful and dedicated prophets, yet he saw little result of his ministry. He was ridiculed, persecuted, and generally rejected along with the message he preached. Jonah, on the other hand, was petty and unwilling, yet through him God won the entire city of Nineveh in one brief campaign. Our usefulness and effectiveness are purely by God’s grace (cf. 1 Cor. 15:10).
It is appropriate that God’s faithful servants be appreciated and encouraged while they are on earth. But they are not to be glorified, set apart, or made the center of special groups or movements.
Paul and Apollos were but God’s fellow workers. It was not their own ministry that they worked in, but His. What divine companionship! It was God’s church in Corinth, not Paul’s or Apollos’s or Peter’s. The believers there were God’s field, God’s building, and His alone. And the glory for any good work done there, or anywhere, is also His alone.
Over lunch, several friends were discussing a church we all knew about which was so wracked with internal strife that it had become common knowledge in the community. Some members, who had no stomach for a fight, were drifting into neighboring churches. Those who remained were being pushed by the opposing groups to take sides, and the affair was becoming very unpleasant. The issue that had precipitated such a furor was the changing of the job description of the organist, who had been there for years and had built a small empire in her area of work. She had developed great skill in using a loyal following as a power base for budget, program, and calendar advantages. So when a special lay committee brought a report to the congregation suggesting a slight change in her duties, she took it as a personal rebuke and declared war. Since none of us were having to deal with the situation, most of us agreed with the one who said, “That doesn’t sound like a big enough problem to split a church.” Then one of the group reminded us of a truth that is too easily forgotten: “Any problem that has to be dealt with by people who are spiritually immature can divide a church, no matter how small it may appear.”
Later, as I reflected upon the conversation, I realized how true that statement was. During the years I’ve been a Christian and a church member I’ve seen divisions created by who was going to play the piano, who would chair a certain committee, or over something as trivial as moving a Sunday school class from one room to another. I have also seen churches face with great spiritual maturity radical change in the community, new and different leadership, and every kind of hardship and seem to become stronger and more united. In this chapter the apostle Paul ties the partisan spirit that is dividing the church to the failure of the members to grow up spiritually.
Spiritual Immaturity Divides
3:1 And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual people but as to carnal, as to babes in Christ. 2 I fed you with milk and not with solid food; for until now you were not able to receive it, and even now you are still not able; 3 for you are still carnal. For where there are envy, strife, and divisions among you, are you not carnal and behaving like mere men?
4 For when one says, “I am of Paul,” and another, “I am of Apollos,” are you not carnal?
1 Corinthians 3:1–4
In the third chapter of his first letter to the Corinthians, while Paul is about to say some pretty devastating things to them about their spiritual condition, he shows that he does view them as fellow Christians by calling them “brethren.” In chapter two, Paul had indicated that one reason he had not come to them with a philosophical approach was that true wisdom was divine in origin and not human. In this chapter he suggests that the reason he has not shared more of the divine wisdom with them is that they have not been spiritually mature enough to receive it.
Many of us think that the controlling factor in what we learn is the knowledge and ability of our preacher or teacher. Paul is suggesting that the spiritual immaturity of the Corinthian Christians had limited what he was able to teach them. I once heard a speaker say, “A great audience makes a great speaker.” At the time I really didn’t understand what he meant, but I’ve come to realize the truth in the statement. Whether one is preaching to a church, teaching a class, or talking to just one person, what is communicated is controlled by the interest, experience, understanding, and spiritual maturity of the listener.
The two terms that Paul used to describe them were “carnal” and “babes in Christ” (3:1). As Paul used the words, they mean the same thing. To be carnal means not to be spiritual. They had received the Spirit, but their lives were still being controlled by their old nature. To be “babes in Christ” meant that they had truly experienced new birth, but that instead of having begun to grow up and mature they had remained in a state of spiritual infancy. In this condition they were neither able to cope with the adult problems that confronted them nor receive mature teaching from Paul about God.
In a renewal conference the leader gave each participant several pipe cleaners and instructed them to spend several minutes thinking about where they were spiritually in their lives and then to shape the pipe cleaners into something which symbolized their condition. When the time for the activity was over, each person was given a chance to tell a small group what he or she had made and how it symbolized his or her own spiritual condition. I was especially moved by a middle-aged man who had made a cradle. He explained it with a tone of shame and regret: “I’m a Christian who has never grown, so I thought this cradle best told the story.” This was the condition of most of the Corinthian Christians, and it created a tremendous obstacle to Paul’s leadership with them.
There is nothing wrong with being an infant or a child. Each week in my last church I had the joy of doing a sermon for the children in kindergarten and the first three grades. I had an old yellow rocking chair at the front of the church sanctuary, and at a certain time in the morning worship the children came and sat on the floor in front of me for “their sermon.” It lasted less than two minutes and had only one very simple idea. As a means of catching and holding their interest, I usually had a picture or some object in my hand. But there were many subjects and ideas that were “off limits” to them because of their limited capacity. I did not resent this because it is natural for children to have the understanding of children. But if when they are grown physically and intellectually and have been Christians for many years, they still have only the child’s capacity for understanding, I know they will not be able to function as God wants them to. This was Paul’s problem in Corinth and, to some degree, it is the problem of many churches today.
The analogy in which Paul contrasts the different types of spiritual food was very popular with other biblical writers. In 1 Peter, new Christians are urged, “like newborn babes, [to] long for the pure milk of the word, that by it you may grow in respect to salvation” (1 Pet. 2:2). These words assume the naturalness of spiritual milk for spiritual babies as a way to stimulate growth. But the author of Hebrews is dealing with a Corinthian-like situation when he writes:
For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the first principles of the oracles of God, and you have come to need milk and not solid food” (Heb. 5:12). Like Paul, he concludes that “solid food belongs to those who are of full age” (Heb. 5:14). Throughout the New Testament “milk” is used to mean that first preaching of the Good News of Jesus Christ. It is the message of the evangelist and the missionary that calls for a response of repentance and faith. It is the first and very important word.
In the same way “meat” is understood to symbolize that teaching which moves beyond our conversion and expands the implications of the gospel to every area of life. In a conversation we had, Billy Graham said, “I envy the work of the pastor. I’m called to preach the gospel and to ask for that first decision for Christ. But the pastor has the privilege of relating all the teachings of the Scripture to that convert as he grows.” Dr. Graham was making the same distinction the biblical writers made.
Through the years of my ministry I have been haunted by the number of people who take the first step of faith and fail to move on to spiritual maturity. If Paul were giving leadership to the church today, there would probably be many who felt that his ABC’s were too deep for them. But while each Christian must accept some responsibility for how he or she responds to growth opportunities, I feel there are certain factors that contribute to the inordinate number of immature Christians. A flawed theology of evangelism will fill the church with “babes in Christ” who are unaware of the need to develop beyond where they are. An anemic understanding of the biblical idea of discipleship will present Christian growth and development as an option and not as a requirement. And a total preoccupation with the numerical growth of the church has been known to have resulted in a neglect of the spiritual growth of the church members.
Now, for Paul at Corinth it was easy to tell who was spiritual and who was carnal: Where there was a spirit of love and unity they were spiritual and where there was strife and jealousy they were carnal. This is a much better system for judging maturity than many people use today. We have a tendency to equate being spiritual with how people talk or with the activities in which they participate. But Paul tied spiritual maturity not to activities but to character and attitude where the Spirit of God was creating in Christians the fruits of the spirit (“love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self control,” Gal. 5:22–23). The person with these qualities could then be called spiritual. Conversely, when jealousy and strife were a part of a person’s life, which was the situation in Corinth, then the “deeds of the flesh are evident” (Gal. 5:19). In these definitions of spiritual and carnal, Paul cuts through all the superficial human definitions and applies true wisdom.
When we don’t grow, several things happen, all of which are bad. First, we lose sight of the real goal that Christ has for us, and that is to become spiritual persons. Then, we look a lot like people who are not Christians. Lostness and spiritual infancy look a lot alike. Finally, both the individual and the church suffer. Prolonged immaturity creates self-doubt, an extended dependence on leaders, and a bridge for sin in the life of the individual. It is only as we do grow that we are able to face adult problems, minister to others, and overcome temptation1
1 Corinthians 3:1–4 (NKJV)
Sectarianism is Carnal
3 And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual people but as to carnal, as to babes in Christ. I fed you with milk and not with solid food; for until now you were not able to receive it, and even now you are still not able; for you are still carnal. For where there are envy, strife, and divisions among you, are you not carnal and behaving like mere men? For when one says, “I am of Paul,” and another, “I am of Apollos,” are you not carnal?
The Family—Maturity (1 Cor. 3:1–4)
Paul already explained that there are two kinds of people in the world—natural (unsaved) and spiritual (saved). But now he explained that there are two kinds of saved people: mature and immature (carnal). A Christian matures by allowing the Spirit to teach him and direct him by feeding on the Word. The immature Christian lives for the things of the flesh (carnal means “flesh”) and has little interest in the things of the Spirit. Of course, some believers are immature because they have been saved only a short time, but that is not what Paul is discussing here.
Paul was the “spiritual father” who brought this family into being (1 Cor. 4:15). During the eighteen months he ministered in Corinth, Paul had tried to feed his spiritual children and help them mature in the faith. Just as in a human family, everybody helps the new baby grow and mature, so in the family of God we must encourage spiritual maturity.
What are the marks of maturity? For one thing, you can tell the mature person by his diet. As I write this chapter, we are watching our grandson and our granddaughter grow up. Becky is still being nursed by her mother, but Jonathan now sits at the table and uses his little cup and (with varying degrees of success) his tableware. As children grow, they learn to eat different food. They graduate (to use Paul’s words) from milk to meat.
What is the difference? The usual answer is that “milk” represents the easy things in the Word, while “meat” represents the hard doctrines. But I disagree with that traditional explanation, and my proof is Hebrews 5:10–14. That passage seems to teach that “milk” represents what Jesus Christ did on earth, while “meat” concerns what He is doing now in heaven. The writer of Hebrews wanted to teach his readers about the present heavenly priesthood of Jesus Christ, but his readers were so immature, he could not do it (note Heb. 6:1–4).
The Word of God is our spiritual food: milk (1 Peter 2:2), bread (Matt. 4:4), meat (Heb. 5:11–14), and even honey (Ps. 119:103). Just as the physical man needs a balanced diet if his body is to be healthy, so the inner man needs a balanced diet of spiritual food. The baby begins with milk, but as he grows and his teeth develop, he needs solid food.
It is not difficult to determine a believer’s spiritual maturity, or immaturity, if you discover what kind of “diet” he enjoys. The immature believer knows little about the present ministry of Christ in heaven. He knows the facts about our Lord’s life and ministry on earth, but not the truths about His present ministry in heaven. He lives on “Bible stories” and not Bible doctrines. He has no understanding of 1 Corinthians 2:6–7.
In my itinerant ministry, I have preached in hundreds of churches and conferences; and I have always been grateful for congregations that wanted to be enlightened and edified, not entertained. It is important that we preach the Gospel to the lost; but it is also important that we interpret the Gospel to the saved. The entire New Testament is an interpretation and application of the Gospel. Paul did not write Romans, for example, to tell the Romans how to be saved—for they were already saints. He wrote to explain to them what was really involved in their salvation. It was an explanation of the “deep things of God” and how they applied to daily life.
There is another way to determine maturity: the mature Christian practices love and seeks to get along with others. Children like to disagree and fuss. And children like to identify with heroes, whether sports heroes or Hollywood heroes. The “babes” in Corinth were fighting over which preacher was the greatest—Paul, Apollos, or Peter. It sounded like children on the playground: “My father can fight better than your father! My father makes more money than your father!”
When immature Christians, without spiritual discernment, get into places of leadership in the church, the results will be disastrous. More than one brokenhearted pastor has phoned me, or written me, asking what to do with church officers who talk big but live small. (In all fairness, I should say that sometimes it is the officers who write asking what to do with an immature pastor!)
The work of the pastor is to help the church grow spiritually and mature in the Lord. This is done by the steady, balanced ministry of the Word. Ephesians 4:1–16 explains how this is done: It is necessary for each member of the body to make his own contribution. God gives spiritual gifts to His people, and then He gives these gifted people to the various churches to build up the saints. As the believers grow, they build the church.
Paul will have more to say about spiritual gifts in 1 Corinthians 12–14, but this should be said now: A mature Christian uses his gifts as tools to build with, while an immature believer uses gifts as toys to play with or trophies to boast about. Many of the members of the Corinthian church enjoyed “showing off” their gifts, but they were not interested in serving one another and edifying the church.
What is the ministry all about? It involves loving, feeding, and disciplining God’s family so that His children mature in the faith and become more like Jesus Christ.2

1 Chafin, K. L., & Ogilvie, L. J. (1985). 1, 2 Corinthians (Vol. 30, pp. 47–51). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Inc.
2 Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, pp. 577–578). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.

Friday, January 25, 2019

NO BIBLE KNOWLEDGE IF YOUR NOT SAVED



BY ILLUMINATION

But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised. But he who is spiritual appraises all things, yet he himself is appraised by no man. For who has known the mind of the Lord, that he should instruct Him? But we have the mind of Christ. (2:14–16)

The third step in the Spirit’s transmission of God’s truth is that of illumination.
It is possible to read the Bible—even many different copies and versions of the Bible—and yet not understand it. It is possible to study the Bible for many years, memorizing much of it, and still not understand it. The scribes and Pharisees of Jesus’ day were highly trained in the Old Testament, yet they missed its central message. They completely failed to recognize the promised Messiah when He came and lived among them (John 5:37–39). They did not believe Jesus because they did not truly believe Moses, the great lawgiver in whom they placed their hope (vv. 45–47). They did not accept the things of the Spirit of God because those things seemed to be foolishness. Because those men did not belong to God, they could not understand them, because they are spiritually appraised. Those scribes and Pharisees, like everyone who rejects God, lived only in the realm of the natural man. They had no means and had no desire to understand the spiritual nature of God’s Word.
The natural man cannot know or understand the things of the Spirit of God because they can only be spiritually appraised. Spiritual is in opposition to natural, and thus refers to the inner capacity of the redeemed to grasp God’s truth. God’s Word is spiritually evaluated, spiritually discerned, spiritually understood—and the natural man is spiritually dead.
The psalmist understood the need for God’s illumination of His Word. He prayed, “Open my eyes, that I may behold wonderful things from Thy law” (Ps. 119:18). He did not need the Lord’s help to read His Word, but he knew he needed His help to understand it.
Martin Luther said, “The Bible cannot be understood simply by study or talent; you must count only on the influence of the Holy Spirit.”
John Calvin wrote: “The testimony of the Spirit is superior to reason. For … these words will not obtain full credit in the hearts of men until they are sealed by the inward testimony of the Spirit.”
Someone else has suggested that the best man can do on his own is to “gnaw the bark of Scripture without getting to the wood.”
God must open the eyes of our understanding before we can truly know and rightly interpret His truth. His truth is available only to those with a regenerate spirit and in whom His Spirit dwells, for only the Spirit can illumine Scripture. Just as the physically blind cannot see the sun, the spiritually blind cannot see the Son. Both lack proper illumination. Martin Luther said, “Man is like a pillar of salt, like Lot’s wife—he is like a log or a stone, he is like a lifeless statue which uses neither eyes nor mouth, neither senses nor heart—unless he is enlightened, converted and regenerated by the Holy Spirit.”
He who is spiritual, on the other hand, appraises all things. The believer has a resident Truth Teacher to enlighten him about all the things of God about which he needs to know. “As for you,” John wrote, “the anointing which you received from Him abides in you, and you have no need for anyone to teach you; but as His anointing teaches you about all things, and is true and is not a lie, and just as it has taught you, you abide in Him” (1 John 2:27). The Holy Spirit takes God’s Word, the Word which He has revealed and inspired, and illuminates it for those in whom He dwells.
Unlike God’s revelation and inspiration, which were given to the biblical writers, His illumination is for all Christians. We all can rightly appraise the Word when we rely on the Giver of the Word.
Because the natural man cannot rightly appraise God’s Word he cannot rightly appraise God’s people, either. He who is spiritual … himself is appraised by no man. It is just as impossible for the world to understand faithful Christians as it is for them to understand God Himself and His Word. They try to appraise believers, of course, but they are always wrong. They may accurately evaluate our faults, shortcomings, and our living that is inconsistent with our faith. But they cannot accurately evaluate our faith. If the gospel itself is a stumbling block and foolishness to them, so is faith based on the gospel.
The person in Christ will be misunderstood and mistreated just as Christ was misunderstood and mistreated (John 15:20). The world will laugh at us, mock us, and, in many places of the world still today, even kill us. The world crucified Christ and it will crucify His followers.
Paul asks, Who has known the mind of the Lord? What natural man thinks God’s thoughts? None. Unbelievers frequently want to correct believers, to argue about the truths we believe and follow. But when they contradict scriptural teaching, they are not arguing with us but with God, whose thoughts they do not understand. They are trying to instruct Him. What folly.
As Christians, however, God instructs us. We are able to understand all things of His Word because we have the mind of Christ. Christ thinks God’s thoughts, understands God’s wisdom. We have His mind (nous). This term is translated “understanding” in 14:14, 15, 19. Its usage here may best be understood from its use in Luke 24:45 of Jesus’ revelation to the disciples on the road to Emmaus: “Then He opened their minds to understand the Scriptures.”
The doctrine of illumination does not mean we can know and understand everything (Deut. 29:29), that we do not need human teachers (Eph. 4:11–12), or that study is not hard work (2 Tim. 2:15). It does mean that Scripture can


MacArthur, J. F., Jr. (1984). 1 Corinthians (pp. 63–65). Chicago: Moody Press.

Sunday, January 13, 2019

1 jn 3


KEYS FROM THE BIBLE TONIGHT''

3 Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed on us, that we should be called children of God! Therefore the world does not know us, because it did not know Him. Beloved, now we are children of God; and it has not yet been revealed what we shall be, but we know that when He is revealed, we shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is. And everyone who has this hope in Him purifies himself, just as He is pure.
Jesus is pure (without sin). So if we place hope in Jesus he makes us like pure and holy. But in practice we still sin but we do not need o sin Our sins are gone and we r made right in Jesus as he forgives. However do I still sin?
Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness. And you know that He was manifested to take away our sins, and in Him there is no sin. Whoever abides in Him does not sin. Whoever sins has neither seen Him nor known Him.
We do not sin. One day this is going to be the truth as sin will be gone. We are not to sin. Christians are not sinners as we r found in the Lord. If we struggle we need to look at Jesus and him on the cross. Note our life is dead and our new life is given and we ought to walk out the new life in Jesus.

Little children, let no one deceive you. He who practices righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous. He who sins is of the devil, for the devil has sinned from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil. Whoever has been born of God does not sin, for His seed remains in him; and he cannot sin, because he has been born of God.

Note we cannot sin because if we r in Jesus the works of the devil are gone on the cross. Wee ought look at this truth when we want to look to our life. A man who does not know Jesus is going to sin and not feel bad or see what is done to take sin away but if anyone be in Jesus they are going to work not to sin and know God has done work to take our sins out of our life.
10 In this the children of God and the children of the devil are manifest: Whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor is he who does not love his brother. 1

1 The New King James Version. (1982). (1 Jn 3:1–10). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.

Thursday, December 27, 2018

are you a fool or wise in your quest for Jesus


4
The Foolishness of God—part 1 (1:18–25)
For the word of the cross is to those who are perishing foolishness, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. For it is written, “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the cleverness of the clever I will set aside.” Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not come to know God, God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. For indeed Jews ask for signs, and Greeks search for wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block, and to Gentiles foolishness, but to those who are the called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men. (1:18–25)
First Corinthians 1:18–2:5 continues to deal with the problem of division in the church, focusing on what Paul calls the “foolishness of God” (v. 25). It is a contrast between the foolishness of men, which they think is wisdom, and the wisdom of God, which they think is foolishness. It is a contrast between God’s true wisdom and man’s supposed wisdom, between God’s supposed foolishness and man’s true foolishness.
The Inferiority of Human Wisdom
The ancient Greeks were in love with philosophy, around which their culture was built. They had perhaps as many as fifty identifiable philosophical parties or movements, which vied for acceptance and influence. Each had its views of man’s origin, significance, destiny, and relationship to the gods—of which they had many. Some of the philosophies had detailed schemes for the religious, political, social, economic, and educational ordering of society. The Greeks were in love with human wisdom. They believed that philosophy (philosophia,, “love of wisdom”) was all-important. Philosophy provided a view, invented by man, of the meaning of life, values, relationships, purpose, and destiny. Thus there were as many philosophies as there were philosophers, and people tended to line up behind their favorite. They widely disagreed as to which philosophy was the truest and most reliable, and, inevitably, many factions developed, each with its own leaders and adherents. Without an absolute standard for truth, ideas of right and wrong were based entirely on human opinion.
Unfortunately many of the Corinthian converts carried their spirit of philosophical factionalism into the church. Some of them still held onto beliefs of their former pagan philosophy. They were divided not only regarding Christian leaders (1:12) but also regarding philosophical viewpoints. They could not get over their love for human wisdom. They had trusted in Christ and recognized their redemption by grace through the cross, but they wanted to add human wisdom to what He had done for them.
Although it is true that men have recognized much that is true about life, a Christian has no need of human philosophy. It is unnecessary and, more often than not, misleading. Where it happens to be right it will agree with Scripture, and is therefore unnecessary. Where it is wrong it will disagree with Scripture, and is therefore misleading. It has nothing necessary or reliable to offer. By nature it is speculation, based on man’s limited and fallible insights and understanding. It is always unreliable and always divisive. “See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, according to the tradition of men, according to the elementary principles of the world, rather than according to Christ” (Col. 2:8).
The general intent of what Paul is saying to the philosophically oriented Corinthians can be stated like this: “Since you have become Christians, have been filled by God’s Spirit, and recognize the Scriptures as His Word, you have no more need for philosophy. It did not help you when you were unbelievers and it will certainly not help you now that you believe. Give it up. It has nothing to offer but confusion and division. You are now united around God’s supreme revelation in Jesus Christ. Don’t be misled and split by human speculations.”
Society in our own day still is enamored of various philosophies. These are not usually expressed in philosophical systems such as the Greeks had, but they are nevertheless human ways of understanding life’s meaning and values and of understanding them. The world today, just as in Paul’s day, is caught up in the admiration and worship of human opinion, human wisdom, and human desires and aspirations. Men are continually trying to figure out on their own what life is all about—where it came from, where it is going, what it signifies (if anything), and what can and should be done about it (if anything). Modern man has made gods of education and human opinion. Although human ideas are constantly changing, appearing and disappearing, being tried and found wanting, conflicting with and contradicting each other, men continue to put faith in them. As long as they reject divine authority, they have no other option.
Just as in Paul’s time, the church today has not escaped the problem. We ourselves can fall prey to current trends in human thought. Some Christians frantically look almost everywhere but to God and His Word for values, meaning, guidance, and help. Or they add human ideas and insights to Scripture or try to “baptize” human ideas and insights with Scripture. We sometimes are more concerned about human opinion than about God’s Word—“using” Scripture, but not fully believing, trusting, and obeying it.
Paul had begun to attack the problem earlier in the chapter: “For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not in cleverness of speech, that the cross of Christ should not be made void” (1:17). “Cleverness of speech” (sophia logou) means literally “wisdom of words” or “wisdom of doctrine.” Paul came to preach God’s Word (which is the gospel), not men’s words (which are sophia logou). From 1:18 through the end of chapter 3, he continues to show the superiority of the former over the latter. In that passage he uses sophia (wisdom) 13 times—sometimes referring to God’s true wisdom (as in 1:24, 30; 2:6–7) and sometimes to man’s presumed wisdom (as in 1:17, 19, 22; 2:4–5). God’s Word is the only true wisdom and is all the wisdom that is reliable and needed. All truth that God intends us to have and that we need is there. It needs no addition of human wisdom, which always falls short of His Word and most often contradicts or distorts it. Scripture stands alone—reliable, sufficient, and complete.
Human wisdom, epitomized in philosophy, has always been a threat to revelation. Martyn Lloyd-Jones has commented, “The whole drift toward modernism that has blighted the church of God and nearly destroyed its living gospel may be traced to an hour when men began to turn from revelation to philosophy.” But the trust in human wisdom that we call modernism is hardly modern. It began with Adam and Eve, when they set their own judgment above God’s, and was in full bloom in Paul’s day. Whenever human wisdom, whether a definite philosophical system or not, gets mixed with divine revelation, revelation loses.
The Bible, for example, affirms that its first five books were written by Moses. In many places in Scripture those books are referred to as “the law of Moses,” using “law” in its broadest sense. Beginning in the late 18th century, however, and coming to a peak about a hundred years later, rationalist scholars developed the “documentary hypothesis.” They did not agree on all details, but the main idea was that the Pentateuch (the first five books) was written by a number of different men over a considerable period of time. Some of those men strongly affirmed that sophisticated codes of law did not even exist in Moses’ day and that he could not possibly have written any of the Pentateuch. (Incidentally, archaeology has long since proved that law was highly developed in the Near East centuries before Moses.) Some parts of the Pentateuch, they maintained, were not written or finally edited until after the Babylonian Exile. They divided those Bible books into various subparts—called J, E, D, and P (representing the supposed Jahwist, Elohist, Deuteronomist, and Priestly sources of the parts).
Behind that theory was the presupposition that only what is understandable to the human mind (rational) is true and reliable. Also behind it was the specific notion of evolution, then coming into vogue among many intellectuals. They reasoned that, because man and his ideas evolve, those parts of the Pentateuch that reflect more “primitive” stories and beliefs were obviously written earlier than those that are more “advanced.” Later editors, or redactors, put it all together in its present form. They taught that monotheism (belief in one God) had not evolved as a theory of deity early in the Pentateuch period, so that part of Scripture must be dated later. Thus philosophy became the judge of biblical authority—and Scripture was declared unreliable.
The most difficult part of the Pentateuch for rationalists to accept is its account of creation. There is no room in evolution for the immediate and full-grown type of creation described in Genesis 1–2. Some scholars, trying to allow for some sort of creation as well as some sort of evolution, hold that God got it all started by creating the raw elements, or perhaps primitive forms of life, and that evolution then took over, with God interjecting the soul at the proper time. But such “theistic evolution” or “progressive creationism” also contradicts Scripture. It imposes a philosophy and process on creation that the literal interpretation of Scripture does not allow. Again revelation was forced to bow to human ego.
Psychology is another form of human wisdom that frequently contradicts or is used to modify or “enhance” God’s Word. It is not a true or exact science but is basically philosophical. It seeks to understand and modify man’s inner workings—his mind, emotions, and spirit—by human observations and theories. But every form of psychology has an underlying, preconceived philosophy that colors, and to a great extent predetermines, its methods and its interpretation of findings. Like every other form of philosophy, it sees man and the world through the lens of human reason and understanding. By its very nature, psychology could never discover and understand sin, because sin is offense against God—whose nature and will are totally outside psychology’s scope. Psychology may understand men’s offending men and try to deal with a person’s feeling of sin and guilt. But human reason and wisdom cannot possibly identify, much less determine, what sin against God is or give a remedy for any of it. Only God’s Word can identify sin and only His forgiveness can remove it. Because sin is offense against God, only God can determine what sin is or provide forgiveness for it. The Bible is clear that the heart of all man’s problems—physical, mental, social, economic, and spiritual—is sin. And a true understanding of sin is completely out of psychology’s realm. But Christ not only can remove guilt feelings; He can remove the guilt itself—in fact, the sin itself.
Even some theologians (whose name means “student or studier of God”) try to improve on God’s Word by their own understandings. Because his own philosophy did not allow for the miraculous, the very influential German theologian Rudolph Bultmann, for example, decided to “demythologize” the Bible—to identify the supposed myths and to consider only what remained to be God’s Word. That is, he decided in advance what God’s Word could and could not be. He relied on his own wisdom to determine God’s wisdom. In doing so he tried to make God in his own human image. When man tries on his own to determine what God is like, what His will is, and what He can and cannot do, the creature merely creates an imaginary god, an idol in his own image and to his own egoistic satisfaction. When human philosophy is in any way imposed upon God’s revelation, revelation loses.
Without exception, man’s wisdom elevates himself and lowers God. It always, no matter how seemingly sincere and objective and scholarly, caters to man’s self-will, pride, fleshly inclinations, and independence. Those are the basic characteristics of the natural man, and they always direct and determine the natural man’s thinking, desires, and conclusions. The reason men love complex, elaborate philosophies and religions is because these appeal to human ego. They offer the challenge of understanding and doing something complex and difficult. For the same reason some men scoff at the gospel. It calls on them to do nothing—it allows them to do nothing—but accept in simple faith what God has done. The cross crushes man’s sin and crushes man’s pride. It also offers deliverance from sin and deliverance from pride.
In his own wisdom man inevitably exchanges the truth of God for a lie and worships the creature rather than the Creator (Rom. 1:25). Man’s wisdom is founded in his own will and it is always directed toward the fulfilling of his own will. Consequently it is always against God’s wisdom and God’s will. Human wisdom (“cleverness of speech”) will always make God’s wisdom (“the gospel” and “the cross of Christ”) void (1 Cor. 1:17).
Men have, of course, made remarkable discoveries and accomplished amazing feats over the centuries, especially in the last fifty years or so. Science and technology have developed countless products, machines, instruments, medicines, and procedures that have made great contributions to human welfare.
It is also true that becoming a Christian does not give us all the answers to everything—certainly not in the areas of science, electronics, math, or any other field of strictly human learning. Many nonbelievers are more educated, brilliant, talented, and experienced than many believers. If we want our car fixed we go to the best mechanic we can find, even if he is not a Christian. If we need an operation we go to the best surgeon. If we want to get an education we try to go the school that has the best faculty in the field in which we want to study.
As long as they are used properly and wisely, medicine and technology and science and all such fields of human learning and achievement can be of great value. Christians should thank God for them.
But if we want answers to what life is about—answers about where we came from, where we are going, and why we are here, about what is right and what is wrong—then human learning cannot help us. If we want to know the ultimate meaning and purpose of human life, and the source of happiness, joy, fulfillment, and peace, we have to look beyond what even the best human minds can discover. Man’s attempts to find such answers on his own are doomed to fail. He does not have the resources even to find the answers about himself, much less about God. In regard to the most important truths—those about human nature, sin, God, morality and ethics, the spirit world, the transformation and future of human life—philosophy is bankrupt.
The Superiority of God’s Wisdom
For the word of the cross is to those who are perishing foolishness, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. (1:18)
When man elevates his own wisdom he automatically attempts to lower God’s wisdom, which looks to him like foolishness, because it conflicts with his own thinking. That God would take human form, be crucified, and raised in order to provide for man’s forgiveness of sin and entrance into heaven is an idea far too simple, foolish, and humbling for the natural man to accept. That one man (even the Son of God) could die on a piece of wood on a nondescript hill in a nondescript part of the world and thereby determine the destiny of every person who has ever lived seems stupid. It allows no place for man’s merit, man’s attainment, man’s understanding, or man’s pride. This word of the cross is foolishness (moria, from which we get moron). It is moronic, absolute nonsense, to unbelievers who rely on their own wisdom—to those who are perishing. That phrase is a graphic description of Christ rejectors, who are in the process of being destroyed in eternal judgment.
Word in verse 18 is from the same Greek term (logos) as “speech” in verse 17. Paul is contrasting man’s word, which reflects man’s wisdom, and God’s Word, which reflects God’s wisdom. Consequently the word of the cross includes the entire gospel message and work, God’s plan and provision for man’s redemption. In its fullest sense it is God’s total revelation, for His revelation centers in the cross. God’s whole redemption story and His whole redemption process seem foolish to unbelievers. And because Christ’s work on the cross is the pinnacle of God’s revealed Word and work, to reject the cross is to reject His revelation, and to perish.
When Paul first came to Corinth he continued to face the maelstrom of philosophies with which he had contended in Athens (Acts 17:18–21). But he had “determined to know nothing among [them] except Jesus Christ, and Him crucified” (1 Cor. 2:2). The response of some in Corinth was the same as that of some in Athens: “When they heard of the resurrection of the dead, [they] began to sneer” (Acts 17:32). But Paul did not change his message to suit his hearers. The Corinthians, like the Athenians and most other Greeks, had more than enough philosophy. They did not need Paul’s opinions added to their own, and the apostle was determined not to give them his opinions but the word of the cross. He would give them nothing but God’s profoundly simple, but historical and objective, truth—not another man’s complex and subjective speculations.
Human wisdom cannot understand the cross. Peter, for example, did not understand the cross when he first heard Jesus speak of it. In fact Peter took Jesus “aside and began to rebuke Him, saying, ‘God forbid it, Lord! This shall never happen to You’ ” (Matt. 16:22). Peter’s own understanding about the Messiah had no place for the cross. He thought the Messiah would soon set up an earthly kingdom and that everything would be pleasant for His followers. But Peter’s wisdom was contrary to God’s wisdom, and anything contrary to God’s wisdom works for Satan. Jesus’ reply to His disciple was quick and sharp: “Get behind Me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to Me; for you are not setting your mind on God’s interests, but man’s” (v. 23). When the soldiers came to the garden to arrest Jesus, Peter still did not understand. He still tried to interfere with God’s plan. Drawing his sword, he cut off a slave’s ear—for which Jesus again rebuked him (John 18:10–11). Only after the resurrection and ascension did Peter understand and accept the cross (Acts 2:23–24; 3:13–15). He now had God’s Spirit and God’s wisdom, and no longer relied on his own. Years later he would write, “He Himself bore our sins in His body on the cross, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness; for by His wounds you were healed” (1 Pet. 2:24).
To the natural mind, whether Jewish or Gentile, the cross is offensive and unacceptable. But to us who are being saved it is the power of God. All men are either in the process of being saved (salvation present is not complete until the redemption of the body—Rom. 8:23; 13:11) or of being destroyed. One’s view of the cross determines which.
Paul proceeds (1:19–2:5) to give five reasons why God’s wisdom is superior to man’s: its permanence, its power, its paradox, its purpose, and its presentation.
the permanence of god’s wisdom
For it is written, “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the cleverness of the clever I will set aside.” Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? (1:19–20)
Paul uses a quotation from Isaiah 29:14 to emphasize that the wisdom of men will be destroyed. Isaiah’s teaching will have its ultimate fulfillment in the last days, when all men’s philosophies and objections to the gospel will be swept away. Christ will reign unopposed and unobstructed as Lord of lords and King of kings (Rev. 17:14), and all of man’s wisdom will become ashes.
But the prophecy also had a more immediate significance and fulfillment, which serves to illustrate its future and ultimate fulfillment. When Isaiah made the prophecy, Sennacherib, the king of Assyria, was planning to conquer Judah. The Lord told His prophet not to worry or fear, because the king’s plan would fail. But it would not fail because of the strength of Judah’s army or because of the strategy of King Hezekiah and his advisors. “The wisdom of their wise men [would] perish, and the discernment of their discerning men [would] be concealed” (Isa. 29:14). Judah would be saved solely by God’s power, with no human help. He destroyed 185,000 men of the Assyrian army with just one angel (37:36). The full account is given in 2 Kings 18–19.
God continually told Israel that He would fight for her. All she had to do was trust and obey. That is why, when Israel went into battle, a choir singing the Lord’s praises often preceded the army.
Men are all inclined to try to solve their problems and fight their battles by their own ingenuity and in their own power. But human ingenuity and power only get in God’s way. Men’s own efforts hinder God in His work rather than help Him. “There is a way which seems right to a man,” Solomon tells us, “but its end is the way of death” (Prov. 14:12). One of the things that keeps many people away from Christ, away from the Bible, and away from salvation is their disagreement with the gospel. It just does not fit their way of thinking. Even when they know their own philosophy or their own religion is shaky, they often would rather put their heads in the sand and hope for the best than simply take God at His word. This is the willful ignorance of unbelief described by Paul in Romans 1:18–23. Pretending to be wise, such men are fools.
Jeremiah asked, “The wise men are put to shame, they are dismayed and caught; behold, they have rejected the word of the Lord, and what kind of wisdom do they have?” (8:9). If men reject God’s revelation, what truth is left, what sort of wisdom do they have? It “is not that which comes down from above, but is earthly, natural, demonic” (James 3:15). Being earthly, it never gets beyond what man can see, touch, and measure. Being natural, it is based on human desires and standards. Being demonic, its real source is Satan. That is human wisdom. “But the wisdom from above,” James goes on to say, “is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, reasonable, full of mercy and good fruits, unwavering, without hypocrisy” (3:17).
Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? (1:20)
This verse specifically teaches that human wisdom not only is unreliable but impermanent. To continue that thought, Paul asks several questions, really one question in three parts. In slightly different form they each ask, “Where are all the smart people that have the answers?” How much closer to peace is man than he was a century ago—or a millennium ago? How much closer are we to eliminating poverty, hunger, ignorance, crime, and immorality than men were in Paul’s day? Our advances in knowledge and technology and communication have not really advanced us. It is from among those who are intelligent and clever that the worst exploiters, deceivers, and oppressors come. We are more educated than our forefathers but we are not more moral. We have more means of helping each other but we are not less selfish. We have more means of communication but we do not understand each other any better. We have more psychology and education, and more crime and more war. We have not changed, except in finding more ways to express and excuse our human nature. Throughout history human wisdom has never basically changed and has never solved the basic problems of man.
In asking about the wise man Paul paraphrased Isaiah, who wrote, “Well then, where are your wise men?” (Isa. 19:12). The prophet was referring to the wise men of Egypt—the soothsayers, mediums, and wizards—who always promised but never produced good counsel. “They have led Egypt astray in all that it does, as a drunken man staggers in his vomit” (v. 14). The scribe probably referred to the Assyrians, who sent scribes along with their soldiers to record the booty taken in battle. But God would see to it that they had nothing to record, nothing to count or to weigh (Isa. 33:18).
The debater of this age does not seem to have a counterpart in the Old Testament. Debater was a very Greek word (suzētētēs) and referred to arguing about philosophy, of which Greeks were so fond. “Where is the debater now?” Paul asks almost sarcastically. “Where have all the clever arguments and impressive rhetoric brought you? Are you better off because of them—or simply more self-satisfied and complacent? Don’t you see that all the wisdom of your wise men, your scribes, and your debaters is folly?” Nothing really changes. Life has the same problems; men have the same struggles.
Could the apostle have written anything more appropriate for our own day? Where have our great thinkers—our philosophers, sociologists, psychologists, economists, scientists, and statesmen—brought us? Never before has mankind been so fearful of self-destruction or been so self-consciously perplexed, confused, and corrupt. Modern human wisdom has failed just as ancient human wisdom failed, except that its failures come faster and spread farther. The outer life improves in a material way, while the inner life seems to have correspondingly less meaning. The real issues are not solved.
Human wisdom sometimes sees the immediate cause of a problem but it does not see the root, which always is sin. It may see that selfishness is a cause of injustice, but it has no way to remove selfishness. It may see that hatred causes misery and pain and destruction, but it has no cure for hatred. It can see plainly that man does not get along with man, but does not see that the real cause is that man does not get along with God. Human wisdom cannot see because it will not see. As long as it looks on God’s wisdom as foolishness, its own wisdom will be foolish. In other words, human wisdom itself is a basic part of the problem.
Peace, joy, hope, harmony, brotherhood, and every other aspiration of man is out of his reach as long as he follows his own way in trying to achieve them. He who sees the cross as folly is doomed to his own folly.
the power of god’s wisdom
For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not come to know God, God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. For indeed Jews ask for signs, and Greeks search for wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block, and to Gentiles foolishness, but to those who are the called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men. (1:21–25)
With all their supposed wisdom men have never been able to know God, much less come to a personal relationship with Him. Man’s increase in knowledge and philosophies tends to increase his problems, not solve them. Hatred increases, misunderstanding increases, conflicts and wars increase, drunkenness increases, crime increases, mental breakdowns increase, family problems increase. They increase not only in numbers, but also in extent and in severity. The more man looks to himself and depends on himself, the worse his situation becomes. As his dependence on his wisdom increases, so do his problems.
This is God’s plan, as the words in the wisdom of God indicate. God wisely established it this way, that man could not come to know Him by the wisdom of the world. Man cannot solve his problems because he will not recognize their source, which is sin, or their solution, which is salvation. Man’s own sinful nature is the cause of his problems, and he cannot change his nature. Even if human wisdom could recognize the problem it does not have the power to change it. But God has the power. God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. He chose to use that which the world’s wisdom counts as moronic, as foolishness, to save those of the world who would simply believe. Believing implies complete assent to all the truth of the saving gospel. For those who will exchange their wisdom for His, God offers transformation, regeneration, new birth and new life through the power of the cross of Jesus Christ, His Son. This “foolishness” is man’s only hope.
When human wisdom recognizes its own bankruptcy and a man turns in faith to Jesus Christ, whose saving work is the message preached, he can exchange poverty for riches, sin for righteousness, despair for hope, death for life. The simplicity of the gospel gives what the complexity of human wisdom promises but never delivers. “Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you thinks that he is wise in this age, let him become foolish that he may become wise” (3:18). When we come down (in the world’s eyes) to the cross, God will raise us up to eternal life.
Even though surrounded by evidences of God’s wisdom men choose to trust their own. They “suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse” (Rom. 1:18–20). The wisdom of men is totally indicted. Their wisdom is not merely ignorant of God’s wisdom but is scornful of it. Their ignorance is willful, because they refuse to recognize that which is “evident,” that which can be “clearly seen.”
Every time a person looks at a mountain he should think of God’s greatness. Every time he sees a sunset he should think of God’s glory. Every time he sees a new life come into the world he should see God’s creative hand at work. Yet an astronomer can look through his telescope and see a hundred thousand stars, and not see God’s greatness. A natural scientist can look through his microscope and see intricacies of life beyond description, yet not see God’s creation. A nuclear physicist can produce a thousand megatons of destruction, yet not recognize God’s power.
When Paul came to Athens he noticed a shrine inscribed: “To an unknown God.” He proceeded to declare to those around him on Mars Hill (the Areopagus), “What therefore you worship in ignorance, this I proclaim to you” (Acts 17:23). With all their learning and philosophies and debating they had come to recognize countless gods—but not the true God. They made for themselves many gods, but the God who had made them they did not know. The world through its wisdom did not come to know God.
God does not expect men to come to Him through their own wisdom; He knows they cannot. But they can come to Him through His wisdom. God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. The phrase message preached is one word in the Greek (kērugmatos) and can also be translated “proclamation.” It does not refer to the act of declaring a message but to the content of the message. The content of God’s message is the gospel, “the word of the cross” and “the power of God” (v. 18). The content, in fact, is Jesus Christ Himself, who is “the power of God and the wisdom of God” (v. 24).
Paul is not talking about foolish preaching, of which there has always been more than enough. He is talking about the preaching of that which is foolish in the world’s eyes—the simple, unadorned, uncomplicated truth of the cross of Jesus Christ that allows no place for man’s wisdom or man’s work or man’s glory. The wisdom and work and glory are all God’s. But the blessing they give can be man’s.
It is not through philosophy, intellectual understanding, or human wisdom that salvation comes, but through believing. God saves only those who believe. Men cannot “figure out” salvation; they can only accept it in faith.
For indeed Jews ask for signs, and Greeks search for wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block, and to Gentiles foolishness. (1:22–23)
Unbelief is always the basic reason for not accepting God’s will and God’s way, but unbelief is expressed in various ways. The Jews wanted supernatural signs before they would believe the gospel. The Gentiles, represented by Greeks, wanted proof through human wisdom, through ideas they could propound and could debate.
Desire for proof most frequently is an evasion, an excuse for not believing. Jesus performed miracle after miracle in the heartland of Judaism, most of them in public. Yet most of those who witnessed the miracles, the supernatural signs, did not believe in Him. A man whom Jesus healed in Jerusalem had been blind from birth and was a well-known beggar in the city. After he was healed, however, some of his neighbors refused to believe he was the same person, even though he told them himself (John 9:9). The man was taken before the Pharisees, to whom he gave his testimony of miraculous healing. They too refused to believe the sign, even with the additional witness of the man’s parents. The Pharisees believed in the supernatural, but only in the supernatural that fit their own scheme of understanding.
At another time, a group of scribes and Pharisees came to Jesus, demanding a sign from Him to prove He was of God. Knowing their insincerity and hypocrisy, Jesus refused to give them a sign—at least of the kind they wanted. He told them, “An evil and adulterous generation craves for a sign; and yet no sign shall be given to it but the sign of Jonah the prophet,” which represented His crucifixion and resurrection (Matt. 12:38–40). As events proved, most of the Jews did not believe even that greatest of all signs when it was given.
Most of the Jews of Jesus’ and Paul’s day could not accept the idea of a crucified Messiah. That was a stumbling block to them (cf. Rom. 9:31–33). To them He was to come in earthly power and splendor and establish an earthly throne and kingdom. Such clear messianic teachings as those found in Psalm 22 and Isaiah 53 were either explained away or ignored. Scripture that did not conform to their preconceived notions was simply reinterpreted or sidestepped.
The Greeks, on the other hand, wanted intellectual proof, something they could mull over and figure out with their own minds. They too were insincere. As Paul had discovered in Athens, the Greek philosophers there were not interested in discovering truth, especially not truth about God. They were interested only in hearing and arguing about exciting new ideas and problems (Acts 17:21). They had no interest in seeking out eternal truth to believe and accept and follow. The wisdom they sought was not divine and eternal wisdom, but human and temporary wisdom. The wisdom they sought, as illustrated by the Athenian philosophers, was not divine truth but intellectual novelty.
Like the Jews, they also had preconceived ideas about what a god could and could not, or would and would not, do. Greeks generally believed that all matter was evil and that everything spiritual was good. It was therefore inconceivable to them that a god could come to earth as a man. It was even more inconceivable that he would want to. To them the gods were indifferent to men. They were totally apathetic to things that transpired on earth.
The second-century philosopher Celsus, who made a career out of attacking Christianity, wrote, “God is good and beautiful and happy, and if in that which is most beautiful and best, if then he descends to man it involves change for him, and a change from good to bad, from beautiful to ugly, from happiness to unhappiness, from what is best to what is worst, and God would never accept such a change.” The idea of the incarnation, not to mention the crucifixion, was utter folly to Greek thinking. To those rationalists nothing could be more absurd than the idea of an incarnate God giving Himself to be crucified in order to secure salvation, holiness, and eternal life for a fallen world.
The two groups Paul mentions here are representative of all of unbelieving mankind. Whether, like the typical Jew, they demand proof by a supernatural sign or, like the typical Greek, they want proof by natural wisdom, unbelievers will find an excuse for rejecting the gospel.
Paul very much believed in the supernatural; and he was, by any standard, highly intelligent. He was both a supernaturalist and a rationalist in the best senses. But above all he was a believer, a believer in God. The gospel is both supernatural and sensible. But it cannot be discovered through supernatural signs or appropriated through natural wisdom apart from a willing heart. It will save only those who believe.
Paul would only preach Christ crucified, the only true sign and the only true wisdom. Those who will not believe that sign or accept that wisdom will not accept God. To those who seek other signs the cross is a stumbling block, and to those who seek other wisdom it is foolishness.
The only message a Christian has to tell is the message of the cross—of God the Son becoming man, of His dying to pay the penalty for our sins, and of His being raised from the dead in order to raise us to life.
But to those who are the called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men. (1:24–25)
Paul makes clear that he had been using the terms Jews and Greeks in a general way to represent unbelieving Jews and Gentiles. God’s called people also include both Jews and Greeks. For those who believe in His Son, the crucified Christ is both the power of God and the wisdom of God. He who is a stumbling block to the unbelieving Jew is Savior of the believing, and the One who is foolishness to the unbelieving Gentile is Redeemer to the believing.
In mentioning God’s foolishness and weakness the apostle is, of course, speaking from the unbeliever’s point of view. Ironically, and tragically, the very part of God’s plan and work that seems most ridiculous and useless from man’s natural standpoint actually exhibits His greatest power and greatest wisdom.
Paul is also saying that, even if God could possess any sort of foolishness, it would be wiser than man’s greatest wisdom. And if God were able to have any weakness, it would be stronger than the greatest strength men could muster.
God’s power is real power, power that means something and accomplishes something. It is not of men but it is offered for men. It is the power of salvation from sin, of deliverance from Satan, of life in God’s very presence for all eternity.
Was Paul crucified for you? (vv. 18–25) The mention of the cross in 1 Corinthians 1:17 introduced this long section on the power of the Gospel versus the weakness of man’s wisdom. It is interesting to see how Paul approached this problem of division in the church. First, he pointed to the unity of Christ: there is one Saviour and one body. Then he reminded them of their baptism, a picture of their spiritual baptism into Christ’s body (1 Cor. 12:13). Then he took them to the cross.
Crucifixion was not only a horrible death; it was a shameful death. It was illegal to crucify a Roman citizen. Crucifixion was never mentioned in polite society, any more than we today would discuss over dinner the gas chamber or the electric chair.
The key word in this paragraph is wisdom; it is used eight times. The key idea that Paul expressed is that we dare not mix man’s wisdom with God’s revealed message. The entire section on wisdom (1 Cor. 1:17–2:16) presents a number of contrasts between the revealed Word of God and the wisdom of men.
God’s wisdom is revealed primarily in the cross of Jesus Christ, but not everybody sees this. Paul pointed out that there are three different attitudes toward the cross.
Some stumble at the cross (v. 23a). This was the attitude of the Jews, because their emphasis is on miraculous signs and the cross appears to be weakness. Jewish history is filled with miraculous events, from the Exodus out of Egypt to the days of Elijah and Elisha. When Jesus was ministering on earth, the Jewish leaders repeatedly asked Him to perform a sign from heaven; but He refused.
The Jewish nation did not understand their own sacred Scriptures. They looked for a Messiah who would come like a mighty conqueror and defeat all their enemies. He would then set up His kingdom and return the glory to Israel. The question of the Apostles in Acts 1:6 shows how strong this hope was among the Jews.
At the same time, their scribes noticed in the Old Testament that the Messiah would suffer and die. Passages like Psalm 22 and Isaiah 53 pointed toward a different kind of Messiah, and the scholars could not reconcile these two seemingly contradictory prophetic images. They did not understand that their Messiah had to suffer and die before He could enter into His glory (see Luke 24:13–35), and that the future messianic kingdom was to be preceded by the age of the church.
Because the Jews were looking for power and great glory, they stumbled at the weakness of the cross. How could anybody put faith in an unemployed carpenter from Nazareth who died the shameful death of a common criminal? But the Gospel of Jesus Christ is “the power of God unto salvation” (Rom. 1:16). Rather than a testimony of weakness, the cross is a tremendous instrument of power! After all, the “weakness of God [in the cross] is stronger than men” (1 Cor. 1:25).
Some laugh at the cross (v. 23b). This was the response of the Greeks. To them, the cross was foolishness. The Greeks emphasized wisdom; we still study the profound writings of the Greek philosophers. But they saw no wisdom in the cross, for they looked at the cross from a human point of view. Had they seen it from God’s viewpoint, they would have discerned the wisdom of God’s great plan of salvation.
Paul called on three men to bear witness: the wise (the expert), the scribe (the interpreter and writer), and the disputer (the philosopher and debater). He asked them one question: Through your studies into man’s wisdom, have you come to know God in a personal way? They all must answer no! The fact that they laugh at the cross and consider it foolishness is evidence that they are perishing.
Paul quoted Isaiah 29:14 in 1 Corinthians 1:19, proving that God has written a big “0—Failure!”—over the wisdom of men. In his address on Mars’ Hill, Paul dared to tell the philosophers that Greek and Roman history were but “times of this ignorance” (Acts 17:30). He was not suggesting that they knew nothing, because Paul knew too well that the Greek thinkers had made some achievements. However, their wisdom did not enable them to find God and experience salvation.
Some believe and experience the power and the wisdom of the cross (v. 24). Paul did not alter his message when he turned from a Jewish audience to a Greek one: he preached Christ crucified. “The foolishness of preaching” (1 Cor. 1:21) does not mean that the act of preaching is foolish, but rather the content of the message. The New International Version states it, “Through the foolishness of what was preached,” and this is correct.
Those who have been called by God’s grace, and who have responded by faith (see 2 Thes. 2:13–14), realize that Christ is God’s power and God’s wisdom. Not the Christ of the manger, or the temple, or the marketplace—but the Christ of the cross. It is in the death of Christ that God has revealed the foolishness of man’s wisdom and the weakness of man’s power.
We are called into fellowship because of our union with Jesus Christ: He died for us; we were baptized in His name; we are identified with His cross. What a wonderful basis for spiritual unity!1


1:18–19 The cross divides the human race. The division is between those who are perishing, to whom the cross is foolishness, and those who are being saved, to whom the cross is wisdom and power. Paul supported this truth by quoting Is 29:14, where God warned the unbelieving leaders of Jerusalem who considered themselves wise. God’s judgment will expose all pretensions to human wisdom not anchored in Christ.2

1 Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, pp. 570–571). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
2 Tomlinson, F. A. (2017). 1 Corinthians. In E. A. Blum & T. Wax (Eds.), CSB Study Bible: Notes (pp. 1812–1813). Nashville, TN: Holman Bible Publishers.