Jesus was led up by the Spirit
into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil (v. 1). The other
Gospel accounts agree with this rendering, though one or two words
are different. After the Holy Spirit descended upon Jesus at His
baptism, we are told immediately that the Spirit of God led Jesus
into the wilderness. However, the Spirit did not merely lead Him
there but drove Him to that place. The Spirit impelled Jesus to go
into the wilderness for the specific purpose of being tempted.
The Scriptures tell us clearly, in James’s epistle,
that temptations arise from within, from the evil inclinations of our
hearts, and we succumb to these temptations as a result of our
corrupt spirit (James 1:14–15). James writes, “Let no one say
when he is tempted, ‘I am temped by God’; for God cannot be
tempted by evil, nor does He Himself tempt anyone” (v. 13). For
that reason, we know that here in Matthew God is not tempting Jesus.
The word Matthew uses can mean “tempt” or “test.” God sent
His Son into the wilderness in order that He would be tempted by
Satan, and the purpose for the temptation was to test Him.
The Sinlessness of Jesus
In our last lesson we considered that when Jesus
submitted to the baptism of John, He did so in part to identify with
His people, to demonstrate the corporate solidarity between Jesus and
the covenant people of God. Jesus did not need to be baptized as
repentance for sin, because He had no sin. Nonbelievers attack the
veracity of the virgin birth and the resurrection of Jesus because
these two events are so manifestly miraculous. Yet there is something
in the Scripture about Jesus that is even more astonishing than His
resurrection from the dead, and that is His sinlessness.
The most righteous among us have not made it without sin
since we got out of our bed this morning. Not one of us has ever
loved the Lord our God with all our heart, mind, and strength. To
imagine a human being, no matter how sanctified, living a life of
complete righteousness without the smallest moral blemish is almost
impossible to conceive. We must remember that one of Jesus’ roles
was to serve as the new Adam, the second Adam. He was called to do
for us what the first Adam failed to achieve. This parallel contrast
between the original Adam and the new Adam is set forth frequently in
the New Testament to show that by the first Adam’s disobedience,
the world was plunged into ruin, but by the second Adam’s
obedience, His followers are redeemed. Both Adams were subjected to a
probationary test to see if they would achieve obedience and
righteousness. For Christ to redeem us as the second Adam, He had to
be put to the test if He was to redeem us. Like the first Adam, He
was placed on probation, and He could not fail His test.
The redemption that Christ accomplished for us was not
achieved by His death alone. He not only had to take our punishment
for sin, but He also had to achieve righteousness on our behalf.
Therefore, His perfect obedience is as necessary to our salvation as
His death upon the cross. Here, in this experience in the wilderness,
that righteousness and obedience are at stake.
The First Test
The location of the first Adam’s test was the garden
of Eden, an unspoiled place filled with the luscious fruit that God
had given to His creatures, saying to them, “Of every tree of the
garden you may freely eat; but of the tree of the knowledge of good
and evil you shall not eat” (Gen. 2:16–17). The setting for Adam
and Eve’s test was a gourmet feast in this pristine garden of Eden.
The setting of the test of the second Adam was in the Judean
wilderness, which, far from being a lush garden, is one of the most
desolate places on earth. Its only inhabitants are spiders,
scorpions, and a few varieties of birds. It was a place forbidding
and foreboding into which the Spirit drove Jesus to be tempted.
The circumstances of His test were to take place on an
empty stomach after a forty-day fast reminiscent of the forty days
and nights of the fast of Moses in the Old Testament before God gave
him the law. The Serpent came to Adam and Eve when their stomachs
were full; he came to the new Adam in the midst of profound hunger.
Additionally, Adam and Eve’s test was not given in the midst of
solitude or loneliness, but in the midst of companionship. They faced
their test with mutual support and encouragement, whereas Christ
faced the devil alone. Unlike Adam and Eve, Jesus faced the devil at
a time when the world was accustomed to sin. You can see the strong
contrast between the two tests.
At the same time, there is a point of similarity that we
do not want to miss: the same issue was at stake. In the garden of
Eden the Serpent came to Adam and Eve with a question: “Has God
indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?”
(Gen. 3:1). Of course God had not said that; God had said they could
freely eat. There was only one place in the garden that was
off-limits. When Eve responded to Satan, saying, “We may eat the
fruit of the trees of the garden; but of the fruit of the tree which
is in the midst of the garden, God has said, ‘You shall not eat it,
nor shall you touch it, lest you die.’ ” Satan told her,
“You will not surely die. For God knows that in the day you eat of
it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good
and evil” (vv. 2–5). So, seeing that the fruit seemed good, they
did eat and plunged the world into ruin.
When the Spirit drove Jesus into the wilderness, Satan
also came with a question: “If You are the Son of God, command
that these stones become bread” (v. 3). The last words echoing
in Jesus’ ears had come from heaven itself, when God audibly spoke,
saying, “This is My beloved Son in whom I am well pleased.” The
devil’s point of attack was the same in both cases—the
trustworthiness of the word of God. Adam and Eve did not believe God,
but Jesus did.
The question of whether Jesus could have sinned comes up
in every generation. Many theologians say it is impossible that Jesus
could have sinned, and they base that argument on the eternal decrees
of God. Did not God decide that Christ would come to this world and
be our Redeemer, and if indeed Christ was ordained to redeem us, then
surely, in light of that divine foreordination, it would have been
impossible for Him to sin. There is some weight to that argument,
because if God ordains from all eternity that something is going to
happen, it most certainly will happen.
There is a tiny but important theological distinction
between the necessity of the consequence and the necessity of the
consequent. From the eternal perspective, there is no possibility
that Jesus would have sinned, just as it would have been impossible
for Adam and Eve or Judas not to sin. However, in terms of the
consequent, God’s eternal decrees work in and through the means
that He appoints, and the appointed means for the fall of the human
race was through the decision of Adam and Eve, which they did without
coercion. In like manner, our Lord was obedient through no coercive
power of God, and in that sense, considering His human nature, He
could have sinned.
Even more important is the Christological issue.
Throughout church history theologians have argued that it would have
been impossible for Jesus to sin because He is God incarnate, and God
cannot sin. However, God incarnate has two natures—a divine nature
and a human nature—and though we cannot divide them, we must
distinguish between them. During His lifetime Jesus got hungry, He
sweated, and He died. Those were manifestations of His human nature,
not His divine nature. God does not sweat. Those who think that
Jesus’ divine nature so overshadowed His human nature so as to make
it impossible for Him to sin have slipped into monophysitism, an old
and lethal heresy in which divine attributes are imputed to the human
nature. Jesus’ human nature was a real human nature with all of the
limitations that go with it. Jesus had the ability to sin, or He
would not have been truly human. Moreover, if Jesus had been
incapable of sinning, the temptation in the wilderness would have
been nothing but a sham.1
Remarkably, from the heights of baptism blessing Jesus
descends into wilderness temptation. It is not accidental—the same
Spirit who anointed him in chapter 3 leads him into the wilderness to
be tempted. The fasting for forty days and forty nights is another
link to the past: Israel, redeemed from Egypt, spent forty years in
the wilderness ‘tested’ by the word of God (see Deut. 8:2). Now
Jesus, called out of Egypt, also spends his probation in the
wilderness.
But there are deeper associations here. After all, sin
entered the world by temptation in a garden. Adam failed the
probation, and sin passed into all men. Now Jesus is tempted in a
wilderness. He will stand where Adam fell, and will bring salvation
into human experience. For this reason, says the writer to the
Hebrews, it was fitting that Jesus should be tempted: ‘Therefore he
had to be made like his brothers in every respect, so that he might
become a merciful and faithful high priest in the service of God, to
make propitiation for the sins of the people. For because he himself
has suffered when tempted, he is able to help those who are being
tempted’ (Heb. 2:17–18).
The reality of the temptation is not diminished by the
fact that Jesus has no sin and cannot sin. He feels its full force
and has to resist until the tempter withdraws from him. Satan takes
advantage of Jesus’ location (the isolation of the wilderness) and
of Jesus’ condition (he is hungry), but he cannot bring him to
yield.
The temptations focus in a particular way on the deity
of Christ. The voice at the baptism declared him to be the Son of
God; the voice in the wilderness now says, ‘If you are the Son of
God …’ In the first assault, the devil wants Jesus to perform a
miracle in order to meet his physical need; in the second, he wants
him to throw himself from the pinnacle of the temple in order to test
whether God will keep his promise; in the third, he wants him to
obtain what God has promised him (all the kingdoms of the world) by
the devil’s way, avoiding the cross altogether.
Jesus’ resource for meeting these assaults is the Word
of God. Interestingly, he finds the Book of Deuteronomy particularly
appropriate; and that should not surprise us, since it was given to
Israel in the Old Testament. Now, for the true Israel, in the
wilderness for his people, the ancient Word of God is the only
adequate help.
One angel—the devil—recedes, while other angels
minister to him.2
THE
THREEFOLD TEMPTATION OF JESUS
Let
us follow the movement of the Gospel of Matthew. Jesus came down to
be born among us and so to be identified with us. He grew up as any
other child would, except that He was harmless and without sin. Now,
in His baptism, He has been identified with us. He has put on our
sin. Now He is going to be tested because there are some real
questions to be answered. Is the King able to withstand a test, and
can He overcome?
The word tempt has a twofold meaning:
1. “Incite or entice to evil; seduce.” There is
something in each of us which causes us to yield to evil. This was
not true of Jesus. “… the prince of this world cometh, and hath
nothing in me” (John 14:30). He was “… holy, harmless,
undefiled, separate from sinners …” (Heb. 7:26). So the
temptation for Jesus had to be different from that which would cause
me to fall, in that it needed to be a much greater temptation.
2. “Test.” God does not tempt men with evil
according to James 1:13. Yet, we are told “… God did tempt
Abraham …” (Gen. 22:1). This means that God was testing the faith
of Abraham.
Jesus is now to be tested. Could Jesus have fallen? I
want to answer that with an emphatic no! He could not have
fallen. If Jesus could have fallen, then you and I do not have a sure
Savior at all.
Perhaps you are asking, “Well then, if Jesus could not
have fallen, was His temptation a legitimate and genuine temptation?”
May I say to you that His temptation was much greater than any that
you and I have ever had. When a new model Chevrolet or Ford or Dodge
is developed, it is thoroughly tested to prove it can stand the test.
And every genuine diamond is tested to show that it is not a phony.
In a similar way, the Lord Jesus Christ was tested to demonstrate
that He was exactly who He claimed to be.
Let me illustrate with this little story. When I was a
boy, I lived out in West Texas. It was a sparsely populated area in
those days. The Santa Fe railroad came through our little town, but
it went on by and stopped in the next little town. But it crossed the
left fork of the Brazos River near our town. In the summertime there
wasn’t enough water in that river to rust a shingle nail, but in
wintertime you could float a battleship on it. One winter we really
had a flood, and it washed out the Santa Fe bridge. We were without a
train for a long time. Finally, they put in a bridge. They worked a
long time on it. Then one day they brought in two engines, stopped
them on the bridge, and tied down their whistles. Believe me, that
was more whistling than we had ever heard in our little town! All
twenty–three of us ran down to see what was happening. As we were
standing around, one brave citizen went up to the engineer in charge
with our question,“What are you doing?” The engineer answered,
“Testing the bridge.” Our man said, “Are you trying to break it
down?” The engineer almost sneered, “Of course not! We’re
testing it to prove that it can’t be broken down.”
May I say to you, that was the exact reason the Lord
Jesus was tested. It was to prove, to demonstrate, that He could not
be broken down. His testing, therefore, was greater than ours. There
is a limit to what we can bear. You give me enough temptation, you
build up the pressure, and finally I’ll succumb to it. That is true
of you too. But Christ never gave in although the pressure continued
to increase. In other words, a ten–pound fishing line will break
when twenty pounds of pressure is put on it, but a hundred–pound
line can bear more than twenty–five pounds of pressure. Now, I’m
the ten–pound fishing line, and He is the one hundred–pound line.
Another really interesting feature of this temptation is
the comparison and contrast with the testing of Eve in the Garden of
Eden. To begin with, Christ was tested in a wilderness while Eve was
tested in a garden. What a contrast!3
**
1
Sproul, R. C. (2013). Matthew (pp. 50–53). Wheaton, IL:
Crossway.
2
Campbell, I. D. (2008). Opening up Matthew (pp. 35–36).
Leominster: Day One Publications.
3
McGee, J. V. (1991). Thru the Bible commentary: The Gospels
(Matthew 1-13) (electronic ed., Vol. 34, pp. 55–56).
Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
Very good read. Thank you for sharing it. ��
ReplyDelete