Next
Jesus turns to people’s attitude to uprightness. Matthew uses the
verb “to hunger”
9 times, but in all the other 8 it refers to literal hunger while
here the meaning is clearly metaphorical (as it is twice in Luke and
once in John). With it is linked thirst,
which is more often used in the metaphorical sense (cf. Ps. 42:2).
Jesus is speaking of an intense longing after righteousness
that may be likened to both hunger and thirst. Everyone now and then
does what is right, but Jesus is pointing his hearers not to
occasional acts but to a passionate concern for the right.
Righteousness
is often used in the New Testament for the right standing believers
have before God because of Christ’s atoning work, but this is often
said to be a Pauline concept rather than one that Matthew sets forth.
Now it is plain that Matthew has a strong interest in the upright
living that should characterize the servant of Christ, and we must
not try to turn him into a pale shadow of Paul. But we must not
minimize his emphasis on grace either (cf. v. 3). Specifically we
should notice that he is not suggesting that people can make a strong
effort and achieve the righteousness of which he is writing: it is a
given righteousness, not an achieved righteousness. The blessed do
not achieve it but hunger
and thirst for it.
They will be filled,
which surely means that God will fill them (cf. 6:33, “his
righteousness”). We need not doubt that the term here includes the
doing of right, an indication that we are expected to live in full
accordance with the will of God. How could anyone have a strong
desire for a right standing before God without at the same time
strongly wanting to do the right? Today there is a strong emphasis on
social righteousness, the liberation of people from oppression, and
that can scarcely be out of mind either. Righteousness
is a rich and full concept, but whichever way we understand it, it is
a righteousness that people cannot produce of themselves. We are to
do our best and we may be able to avoid “the gutters of life,”
but this righteousness is a gift of God. And of those who have this
wholehearted longing for the right Jesus says, they
will be filled.26
They do not achieve it of themselves, but God fulfils their longing.
God will not disappoint anyone who has this deep desire to do his
will. Those who long for righteousness will have a full measure, not
a mere trace. There are two thoughts here, the first of which insists
on the disposition of the seeker. The good gift of God does not come
indiscriminately to all the race, but only to those who seek it
wholeheartedly. The second is that, for all their intense longing,
the seekers do not fill themselves with righteousness, but are
filled; righteousness is a gift of God.1
the righteousness of God is a gift when
one is saved.
What
about the natural man; does he hunger and thirst for righteousness?
The ones I meet do not! “But the natural man receiveth not the
things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him:
neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned”
(1 Cor. 2:14). The “natural man” is in contrast to the spiritual
man who has found that Christ is his righteousness—“… of him
are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and
righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption” (1 Cor. 1:30).2
.
“Blind guides” is a perfect description, one that must have
brought a smile to the lips of the listeners. Jesus had used it
before (Matt. 15:14). The Pharisees were blind to the true values of
life. Their priorities were confused. They would take an oath and use
some sacred object to substantiate that oath—the gold in the
temple, for example, or the gift on the altar. But they would not
swear by the temple itself or the altar. It was the temple that
sanctified the gold and the altar that sanctified the gift. They were
leaving God out of their priorities.
Jesus knew that the Pharisees wanted both the gold and
the gifts on the altar. This is why the Pharisees practiced
“Corban”—anything dedicated to God could not be used for others
(Matt. 15:1–9; Mark 7:10–13). These men were not seeking for the
righteousness of God; they were greedy for gain. They worked out a
“religious system” that permitted them to rob God and others and
still maintain their reputations.3
These future
possessors of the earth are its presently-installed rightful heirs
and even now they hunger and thirst after righteousness. They
experience a deep desire for personal righteousness which is, in
itself, a proof of their spiritual re-birth. Those who are poor and
empty in their own spiritual poverty recognize the depth of their
need and hunger and thirst for that which only God can give them. To
hunger means to be needy. It is joined with to thirst; the born-again
man has a God-given hunger and thirst (inner passion) for
righteousness. This hungering and thirsting continues throughout the
life of the believer. He continues to hunger and to be filled and to
hunger and to be filled. God supplies his every spiritual need daily.
This act of hungering and thirsting after righteousness is the
by-product of a regenerated life.
Lawlor (p. 60) rightly states that this is the
description of a man who has already been saved. Nowhere does the
Bible command unbelievers to hunger after righteousness in order to
be saved. Rather, Paul clearly states “there is none that
understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God” (Rom 3:11).
The biblical writers make it clear that while man must come to Christ
for salvation, it is not within man’s normal ability and desire to
want to come to God. Therefore, God is depicted throughout the New
Testament as the seeking Saviour going after the lost. They shall
be filled (Gr chortazō) refers to a complete filling and
satisfaction. The psalmist proclaimed: “He satisfieth the longing
soul, and filleth the hungry soul with goodness” (107:9). This
filling comes from God, who is the total source of satisfaction of
His people. It comes now and it will continue to come throughout
eternity to those who hunger and thirst for it.4
“Blessed
are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be
filled” (v. 6). Commentators say that what Jesus had in mind
here are those believers who passionately search for the imputation
of the righteousness of Christ by which we receive our standing
before God. We do not have enough righteousness of our own to get us
into heaven, they say. Only those who are clothed with the
righteousness of Christ will ever enter into His kingdom. Certainly
that is true, but I doubt that is what Jesus had in mind here,
because even though we are justified by faith and not by our works,
we are justified unto works. We have been elected by God and received
His grace unto righteousness. Even though our righteousness will
never justify us, the fruit of our justification is growth in real
righteousness. As Martin Luther said, we were dead in our sins, but
God raised us from the dead, and He declared us well while we were
still in sin. That is what justification by faith means. Not only did
He give us that declaration, but He gave us the medicine by which we
actually do become conformed to the image of Jesus, and every
Christian is called to grow up into maturity and righteousness.
Elsewhere in this Gospel we are going to see this quest
for righteousness, but we have an allergy to it because we tend to
link righteousness with self-righteousness, that which the Pharisees
displayed, rather than with real righteousness. Real righteousness
is, simply, doing what is right. That should be a concern for us, and
not just a passing concern. The images used here are those of hunger
and thirst. This message was given to people who, for the most part,
lived in the desert, who knew what it meant to have such a parched
palate that their thirst was so consuming that just one cup of cold
water would dramatically improve their condition. They also knew what
it meant to endure starvation, to go hungry for long periods of time.
For someone who is in that state of hunger, like one who crosses the
desert and runs out of water and prays every second for the
appearance of an oasis, the pursuit of that oasis is the only thing
that keeps him going. The intensity of that sort of thirst and hunger
is what Jesus says should mark our lives.
As a young man Jonathan Edwards wrote down resolutions
for the virtues that he sought to achieve in his life, and by the
grace of God he became a model of righteousness. At almost the same
time there was another man in colonial America who also sought after
righteousness without the aid of God. His name was Benjamin Franklin.
Franklin made a list of the virtues that he wanted to manifest. Each
day he would examine himself as to whether he had accomplished a
particular righteousness during the preceding twenty-four hours. He
confessed that, after noting for a number of consecutive days his
success with humility, that he was becoming proud of his humility.
Even the unregenerate understand at certain points their failure to
achieve real righteousness.
That would be a wonderful thing to have on our
tombstone, that we were righteous. We ought not to despise
righteousness as something that belongs only to the self-righteous;
rather, we should love righteousness enough to pursue it intensely as
those who hunger and thirst, because God promises that if we hunger
for righteousness, we will not be sent away empty. We will receive
the bread of life that will feed us for eternity. If we thirst for
righteousness, the Son of righteousness will come with living water
that will well up in our souls to eternal life. We will be filled. We
will be satisfied from these pursuits.5
So
again, the blessedness pronounced on them who
hunger and thirst after righteousness.
It were a weakness of judgment indeed, to suppose, that the
righteousness such souls most earnestly desire, is the righteousness
of mere moral honesty and justice between man and man in life. These
things the laws among men enforce, and the Scribes and Pharisees of
our Lord’s
days, prided themselves upon them. Surely no one who reads his Bible
can for a moment, if he thinks rightly, suppose that the Son
of God
came upon earth to preach what even unenlightened heathens had always
insisted upon. This would be indeed to run back to the law of Moses,
instead of preaching the Gospel of Christ.
But the righteousness the Son
of God
had in view, when declaring these souls blessed which hungered and
thirsted for it, was his own complete righteousness, which alone can
justify a poor sinner in the sight of God.
So that in the hungering for it, the soul gave evident proofs that he
had no righteousness of his own to appear in before God,
and therefore earnestly longed to be cloathed with Christ’s
robe of righteousness, and garment of salvation. And graciously the
Lord Jesus
here declares all such shall not hunger in vain. He who excites the
hunger in the soul, is He who also satisfieth it. And hence the
promises and the performance. Psalm 132:9–16. Isaiah 61:1, 2, 3,
10, 11.6
5:6
hunger and thirst for righteousness.
This is the opposite of the self-righteousness of the Pharisees. It
speaks of those who seek God’s righteousness rather than attempting
to establish a righteousness of their own (Ro 10:3; Php 3:9). What
they seek will fill them, i.e., it will satisfy their hunger and
thirst for a right relationship with God.7
For thew Gospel to have Jesus in the
heart and to love him fully
5:6
Those who hunger and
thirst for righteousness
recognize that God is the ultimate source of real righteousness, so
they long for his righteous character to be evident in people’s
lives on earth. They shall
be satisfied by
responding to his invitation to be in relationship with him.8
1
Morris, L. (1992). The Gospel according to Matthew (pp.
98–100). Grand Rapids, MI; Leicester, England: W.B. Eerdmans;
Inter-Varsity Press.
2
McGee, J. V. (1991). Thru the Bible commentary: The Gospels
(Matthew 1-13) (electronic ed., Vol. 34, pp. 75–76).
Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
3
Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol.
1, pp. 84–85). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
4
Hindson, E. E., & Kroll, W. M. (Eds.). (1994). KJV Bible
Commentary (pp. 1884–1885). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
5
Sproul, R. C. (2013). Matthew (pp. 82–83). Wheaton, IL:
Crossway.
6
Hawker, R. (2013). Poor Man’s New Testament Commentary:
Matthew–John (Vol. 1, p. 36). Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible
Software.
7
MacArthur, J. F., Jr. (2006). The MacArthur study Bible: New
American Standard Bible. (Mt 5:6). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson
Publishers.
8
Crossway Bibles. (2008). The ESV Study Bible (p. 1828).
Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
No comments:
Post a Comment